Cargando…

Simple generalisation of a mesophyll resistance model for various intracellular arrangements of chloroplasts and mitochondria in C(3) leaves

The classical definition of mesophyll conductance (g (m)) represents an apparent parameter (g (m,app)) as it places (photo)respired CO(2) at the same compartment where the carboxylation by Rubisco takes place. Recently, Tholen and co-workers developed a framework, in which g (m) better describes a p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yin, Xinyou, Struik, Paul C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28197891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11120-017-0340-8
Descripción
Sumario:The classical definition of mesophyll conductance (g (m)) represents an apparent parameter (g (m,app)) as it places (photo)respired CO(2) at the same compartment where the carboxylation by Rubisco takes place. Recently, Tholen and co-workers developed a framework, in which g (m) better describes a physical diffusional parameter (g (m,dif)). They partitioned mesophyll resistance (r (m,dif) = 1/g (m,dif)) into two components, cell wall and plasmalemma resistance (r (wp)) and chloroplast resistance (r (ch)), and showed that g (m,app) is sensitive to the ratio of photorespiratory (F) and respiratory (R (d)) CO(2) release to net CO(2) uptake (A): g (m,app) = g (m,dif)/[1 + ω(F + R (d))/A], where ω is the fraction of r (ch) in r (m,dif). We herein extend the framework further by considering various scenarios for the intracellular arrangement of chloroplasts and mitochondria. We show that the formula of Tholen et al. implies either that mitochondria, where (photo)respired CO(2) is released, locate between the plasmalemma and the chloroplast continuum or that CO(2) in the cytosol is completely mixed. However, the model of Tholen et al. is still valid if ω is replaced by ω(1−σ), where σ is the fraction of (photo)respired CO(2) that experiences r (ch) (in addition to r (wp) and stomatal resistance) if this CO(2) is to escape from being refixed. Therefore, responses of g (m,app) to (F + R (d))/A lie somewhere between no sensitivity in the classical method (σ =1) and high sensitivity in the model of Tholen et al. (σ =0).