Cargando…

Assessing Somatosensory Utilization during Unipedal Postural Control

Multisensory—visual, vestibular and somatosensory information is integrated for appropriate postural control. The primary goal of this study was to assess somatosensory utilization during a functional motor task of unipedal postural control, in normal healthy adults. Assessing individual bias in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goel, Rahul, De Dios, Yiri E., Gadd, Nichole E., Caldwell, Erin E., Peters, Brian T., Reschke, Millard F., Bloomberg, Jacob J., Oddsson, Lars I. E., Mulavara, Ajitkumar P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28443004
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2017.00021
_version_ 1782520866828976128
author Goel, Rahul
De Dios, Yiri E.
Gadd, Nichole E.
Caldwell, Erin E.
Peters, Brian T.
Reschke, Millard F.
Bloomberg, Jacob J.
Oddsson, Lars I. E.
Mulavara, Ajitkumar P.
author_facet Goel, Rahul
De Dios, Yiri E.
Gadd, Nichole E.
Caldwell, Erin E.
Peters, Brian T.
Reschke, Millard F.
Bloomberg, Jacob J.
Oddsson, Lars I. E.
Mulavara, Ajitkumar P.
author_sort Goel, Rahul
collection PubMed
description Multisensory—visual, vestibular and somatosensory information is integrated for appropriate postural control. The primary goal of this study was to assess somatosensory utilization during a functional motor task of unipedal postural control, in normal healthy adults. Assessing individual bias in the utilization of individual sensory contributions during postural control may help customization of rehabilitation protocols. In this study, a test paradigm of unipedal stance control in supine orientation with and without vision was assessed. Postural control in this test paradigm was hypothesized to utilize predominantly contributions of somatosensory information from the feet and ankle joint, with minimal vestibular input. Fourteen healthy subjects “stood” supine on their dominant leg while strapped to a backpack frame that was freely moving on air-bearings, to remove available otolith tilt cues with respect to gravity that influences postural control when standing upright. The backpack was attached through a cable to a pneumatic cylinder that provided a gravity-like load. Subjects performed three trials each with Eyes-open (EO) and Eyes-closed (EC) while loaded with 60% body weight. There was no difference in unipedal stance time (UST) across the two conditions with EC condition challenging the postural control system greater than the EO condition. Stabilogram-diffusion analysis (SDA) indicated that the critical mean square displacement was significantly different between the two conditions. Vestibular cues, both in terms of magnitude and the duration for which relevant information was available for postural control in this test paradigm, were minimized. These results support our hypothesis that maintaining unipedal stance in supine orientation without vision, minimizes vestibular contribution and thus predominantly utilizes somatosensory information for postural control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5387047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53870472017-04-25 Assessing Somatosensory Utilization during Unipedal Postural Control Goel, Rahul De Dios, Yiri E. Gadd, Nichole E. Caldwell, Erin E. Peters, Brian T. Reschke, Millard F. Bloomberg, Jacob J. Oddsson, Lars I. E. Mulavara, Ajitkumar P. Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience Multisensory—visual, vestibular and somatosensory information is integrated for appropriate postural control. The primary goal of this study was to assess somatosensory utilization during a functional motor task of unipedal postural control, in normal healthy adults. Assessing individual bias in the utilization of individual sensory contributions during postural control may help customization of rehabilitation protocols. In this study, a test paradigm of unipedal stance control in supine orientation with and without vision was assessed. Postural control in this test paradigm was hypothesized to utilize predominantly contributions of somatosensory information from the feet and ankle joint, with minimal vestibular input. Fourteen healthy subjects “stood” supine on their dominant leg while strapped to a backpack frame that was freely moving on air-bearings, to remove available otolith tilt cues with respect to gravity that influences postural control when standing upright. The backpack was attached through a cable to a pneumatic cylinder that provided a gravity-like load. Subjects performed three trials each with Eyes-open (EO) and Eyes-closed (EC) while loaded with 60% body weight. There was no difference in unipedal stance time (UST) across the two conditions with EC condition challenging the postural control system greater than the EO condition. Stabilogram-diffusion analysis (SDA) indicated that the critical mean square displacement was significantly different between the two conditions. Vestibular cues, both in terms of magnitude and the duration for which relevant information was available for postural control in this test paradigm, were minimized. These results support our hypothesis that maintaining unipedal stance in supine orientation without vision, minimizes vestibular contribution and thus predominantly utilizes somatosensory information for postural control. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5387047/ /pubmed/28443004 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2017.00021 Text en Copyright © 2017 Goel, De Dios, Gadd, Caldwell, Peters, Reschke, Bloomberg, Oddsson and Mulavara. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Goel, Rahul
De Dios, Yiri E.
Gadd, Nichole E.
Caldwell, Erin E.
Peters, Brian T.
Reschke, Millard F.
Bloomberg, Jacob J.
Oddsson, Lars I. E.
Mulavara, Ajitkumar P.
Assessing Somatosensory Utilization during Unipedal Postural Control
title Assessing Somatosensory Utilization during Unipedal Postural Control
title_full Assessing Somatosensory Utilization during Unipedal Postural Control
title_fullStr Assessing Somatosensory Utilization during Unipedal Postural Control
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Somatosensory Utilization during Unipedal Postural Control
title_short Assessing Somatosensory Utilization during Unipedal Postural Control
title_sort assessing somatosensory utilization during unipedal postural control
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28443004
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2017.00021
work_keys_str_mv AT goelrahul assessingsomatosensoryutilizationduringunipedalposturalcontrol
AT dediosyirie assessingsomatosensoryutilizationduringunipedalposturalcontrol
AT gaddnicholee assessingsomatosensoryutilizationduringunipedalposturalcontrol
AT caldwellerine assessingsomatosensoryutilizationduringunipedalposturalcontrol
AT petersbriant assessingsomatosensoryutilizationduringunipedalposturalcontrol
AT reschkemillardf assessingsomatosensoryutilizationduringunipedalposturalcontrol
AT bloombergjacobj assessingsomatosensoryutilizationduringunipedalposturalcontrol
AT oddssonlarsie assessingsomatosensoryutilizationduringunipedalposturalcontrol
AT mulavaraajitkumarp assessingsomatosensoryutilizationduringunipedalposturalcontrol