Cargando…

To Wait or Not to Wait—Separate Mechanisms in the Oculomotor Circuit of Basal Ganglia

We reach a goal immediately after detecting the target, or later by withholding the immediate action. Each time, we choose one of these actions by suppressing the other. How does the brain control these antagonistic actions? We hypothesized that the output of basal ganglia (BG), substantia nigra par...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yasuda, Masaharu, Hikosaka, Okihide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28443002
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2017.00035
_version_ 1782520872682127360
author Yasuda, Masaharu
Hikosaka, Okihide
author_facet Yasuda, Masaharu
Hikosaka, Okihide
author_sort Yasuda, Masaharu
collection PubMed
description We reach a goal immediately after detecting the target, or later by withholding the immediate action. Each time, we choose one of these actions by suppressing the other. How does the brain control these antagonistic actions? We hypothesized that the output of basal ganglia (BG), substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr), suppresses antagonistic oculomotor signals by sending strong inhibitory output to superior colliculus (SC). To test this hypothesis, we trained monkeys to perform two kinds of saccade task: Immediate (visually guided) and delayed (visually-withheld but memory-guided) saccade tasks. In both tasks, we applied one-direction-reward (1DR) procedure to modify the level of goal-reaching motivation. We identified SNr neurons that projected to SC by their antidromic activation from SC. We stimulated SC on both sides because SNr neurons projecting to the ipsilateral SC (ipsiSC) and those projecting to the contralateral SC (contraSC) might have antagonistic functions. First, we found that ipsiSC-projecting neurons were about 10 times more than contraSC-projecting neurons. More importantly, ipsiSC-projecting SNr neurons were roughly divided into two groups which would control immediate and delayed saccades separately. The immediate-type SNr neurons were clearly inhibited by a visual target on the contralateral side in both visual- and memory-1DR tasks. The inhibition would disinhibit SC neurons and facilitate a saccade to the contralateral target. This is goal-directed in visual-1DR task, but is erroneous in memory-1DR task. In contrast, the delayed-type SNr neurons tended to be excited by a visual target (especially on the contralateral side), which would suppress the immediate saccade to the target. Instead, they were inhibited before a delayed (memory-guided) saccade directed to the contralateral side, which would facilitate the saccade. ContraSC-projecting SNr neurons were more variable with no grouped features, although some of them may contribute to the saccade to the ipsilateral target. Finally, we found that some ipsiSC-projecting SNr neurons were inhibited more strongly when reward was expected, which was associated with shortened saccade reaction times. However, many SNr neurons showed no reward-expectation effect. These results suggest that two separate oculomotor circuits exist in BG, both of which contribute to goal-directed behavior, but in different temporal contexts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5387073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53870732017-04-25 To Wait or Not to Wait—Separate Mechanisms in the Oculomotor Circuit of Basal Ganglia Yasuda, Masaharu Hikosaka, Okihide Front Neuroanat Neuroscience We reach a goal immediately after detecting the target, or later by withholding the immediate action. Each time, we choose one of these actions by suppressing the other. How does the brain control these antagonistic actions? We hypothesized that the output of basal ganglia (BG), substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr), suppresses antagonistic oculomotor signals by sending strong inhibitory output to superior colliculus (SC). To test this hypothesis, we trained monkeys to perform two kinds of saccade task: Immediate (visually guided) and delayed (visually-withheld but memory-guided) saccade tasks. In both tasks, we applied one-direction-reward (1DR) procedure to modify the level of goal-reaching motivation. We identified SNr neurons that projected to SC by their antidromic activation from SC. We stimulated SC on both sides because SNr neurons projecting to the ipsilateral SC (ipsiSC) and those projecting to the contralateral SC (contraSC) might have antagonistic functions. First, we found that ipsiSC-projecting neurons were about 10 times more than contraSC-projecting neurons. More importantly, ipsiSC-projecting SNr neurons were roughly divided into two groups which would control immediate and delayed saccades separately. The immediate-type SNr neurons were clearly inhibited by a visual target on the contralateral side in both visual- and memory-1DR tasks. The inhibition would disinhibit SC neurons and facilitate a saccade to the contralateral target. This is goal-directed in visual-1DR task, but is erroneous in memory-1DR task. In contrast, the delayed-type SNr neurons tended to be excited by a visual target (especially on the contralateral side), which would suppress the immediate saccade to the target. Instead, they were inhibited before a delayed (memory-guided) saccade directed to the contralateral side, which would facilitate the saccade. ContraSC-projecting SNr neurons were more variable with no grouped features, although some of them may contribute to the saccade to the ipsilateral target. Finally, we found that some ipsiSC-projecting SNr neurons were inhibited more strongly when reward was expected, which was associated with shortened saccade reaction times. However, many SNr neurons showed no reward-expectation effect. These results suggest that two separate oculomotor circuits exist in BG, both of which contribute to goal-directed behavior, but in different temporal contexts. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5387073/ /pubmed/28443002 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2017.00035 Text en Copyright © 2017 Yasuda and Hikosaka. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Yasuda, Masaharu
Hikosaka, Okihide
To Wait or Not to Wait—Separate Mechanisms in the Oculomotor Circuit of Basal Ganglia
title To Wait or Not to Wait—Separate Mechanisms in the Oculomotor Circuit of Basal Ganglia
title_full To Wait or Not to Wait—Separate Mechanisms in the Oculomotor Circuit of Basal Ganglia
title_fullStr To Wait or Not to Wait—Separate Mechanisms in the Oculomotor Circuit of Basal Ganglia
title_full_unstemmed To Wait or Not to Wait—Separate Mechanisms in the Oculomotor Circuit of Basal Ganglia
title_short To Wait or Not to Wait—Separate Mechanisms in the Oculomotor Circuit of Basal Ganglia
title_sort to wait or not to wait—separate mechanisms in the oculomotor circuit of basal ganglia
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28443002
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2017.00035
work_keys_str_mv AT yasudamasaharu towaitornottowaitseparatemechanismsintheoculomotorcircuitofbasalganglia
AT hikosakaokihide towaitornottowaitseparatemechanismsintheoculomotorcircuitofbasalganglia