Cargando…

A comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi pregnant women in England; analysis of retrospective data

BACKGROUND: Maternal obesity increases women’s risk of poor birth outcomes, and statistics show that Pakistani and Bangladeshi women (who are born or settled) in the UK experience higher rates of perinatal mortality and congenital anomalies than white British or white Other women. This study compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garcia, Rebecca, Ali, Nasreen, Guppy, Andy, Griffiths, Malcolm, Randhawa, Gurch
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28399916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4211-1
_version_ 1782520901483364352
author Garcia, Rebecca
Ali, Nasreen
Guppy, Andy
Griffiths, Malcolm
Randhawa, Gurch
author_facet Garcia, Rebecca
Ali, Nasreen
Guppy, Andy
Griffiths, Malcolm
Randhawa, Gurch
author_sort Garcia, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Maternal obesity increases women’s risk of poor birth outcomes, and statistics show that Pakistani and Bangladeshi women (who are born or settled) in the UK experience higher rates of perinatal mortality and congenital anomalies than white British or white Other women. This study compares the prevalence of maternal obesity in Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi and white British women using standard and Asian-specific BMI metrics. METHOD: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis using routinely recorded secondary data in Ciconia Maternity information System (CMiS), between 2008 and 2013. Mothers (n = 15,205) whose ethnicity was recorded as white British, Bangladeshi, Pakistani or Indian. Adjusted standardised residuals and Pearson Chi-square. Main outcome measures: Percentage of mothers stratified by ethnicity (Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi and white British) who are classified as overweight or obese using standard and revised World Health Organisation BMI thresholds. RESULTS: Compared to standard BMI thresholds, using the revised BMI threshold resulted in a higher prevalence of obesity: 22.8% of Indian and 24.3% of Bangladeshi and 32.3% of Pakistani women. Pearson Chi-square confirmed that significantly more Pakistani women were classified as ‘obese’ compared with white British, Indian or Bangladeshi women (χ (2) = 499,88 df = 9, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There are differences in the prevalence of obese and overweight women stratified by maternal ethnicity of white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi. Using revised anthropometric measures in Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi women has clinical implications for identifying risks associated with obesity and increased complications in pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5387224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53872242017-04-11 A comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi pregnant women in England; analysis of retrospective data Garcia, Rebecca Ali, Nasreen Guppy, Andy Griffiths, Malcolm Randhawa, Gurch BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Maternal obesity increases women’s risk of poor birth outcomes, and statistics show that Pakistani and Bangladeshi women (who are born or settled) in the UK experience higher rates of perinatal mortality and congenital anomalies than white British or white Other women. This study compares the prevalence of maternal obesity in Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi and white British women using standard and Asian-specific BMI metrics. METHOD: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis using routinely recorded secondary data in Ciconia Maternity information System (CMiS), between 2008 and 2013. Mothers (n = 15,205) whose ethnicity was recorded as white British, Bangladeshi, Pakistani or Indian. Adjusted standardised residuals and Pearson Chi-square. Main outcome measures: Percentage of mothers stratified by ethnicity (Indian, Pakistani, Bangladeshi and white British) who are classified as overweight or obese using standard and revised World Health Organisation BMI thresholds. RESULTS: Compared to standard BMI thresholds, using the revised BMI threshold resulted in a higher prevalence of obesity: 22.8% of Indian and 24.3% of Bangladeshi and 32.3% of Pakistani women. Pearson Chi-square confirmed that significantly more Pakistani women were classified as ‘obese’ compared with white British, Indian or Bangladeshi women (χ (2) = 499,88 df = 9, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There are differences in the prevalence of obese and overweight women stratified by maternal ethnicity of white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi. Using revised anthropometric measures in Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi women has clinical implications for identifying risks associated with obesity and increased complications in pregnancy. BioMed Central 2017-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5387224/ /pubmed/28399916 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4211-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Garcia, Rebecca
Ali, Nasreen
Guppy, Andy
Griffiths, Malcolm
Randhawa, Gurch
A comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi pregnant women in England; analysis of retrospective data
title A comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi pregnant women in England; analysis of retrospective data
title_full A comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi pregnant women in England; analysis of retrospective data
title_fullStr A comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi pregnant women in England; analysis of retrospective data
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi pregnant women in England; analysis of retrospective data
title_short A comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white British, Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi pregnant women in England; analysis of retrospective data
title_sort comparison of antenatal classifications of ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ prevalence between white british, indian, pakistani and bangladeshi pregnant women in england; analysis of retrospective data
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28399916
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4211-1
work_keys_str_mv AT garciarebecca acomparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata
AT alinasreen acomparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata
AT guppyandy acomparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata
AT griffithsmalcolm acomparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata
AT randhawagurch acomparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata
AT garciarebecca comparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata
AT alinasreen comparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata
AT guppyandy comparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata
AT griffithsmalcolm comparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata
AT randhawagurch comparisonofantenatalclassificationsofoverweightandobesityprevalencebetweenwhitebritishindianpakistaniandbangladeshipregnantwomeninenglandanalysisofretrospectivedata