Cargando…
Avoidable costs of stenting for aortic coarctation in the United Kingdom: an economic model
BACKGROUND: Undesirable outcomes in health care are associated with patient harm and substantial excess costs. Coarctation of the aorta (CoA), one of the most common congenital heart diseases, can be repaired with stenting but requires monitoring and subsequent interventions to detect and treat dise...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28395657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2215-2 |
_version_ | 1782520905949249536 |
---|---|
author | Salcher, Maximilian Mcguire, Alistair Muthurangu, Vivek Kelm, Marcus Kuehne, Titus Naci, Huseyin |
author_facet | Salcher, Maximilian Mcguire, Alistair Muthurangu, Vivek Kelm, Marcus Kuehne, Titus Naci, Huseyin |
author_sort | Salcher, Maximilian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Undesirable outcomes in health care are associated with patient harm and substantial excess costs. Coarctation of the aorta (CoA), one of the most common congenital heart diseases, can be repaired with stenting but requires monitoring and subsequent interventions to detect and treat disease recurrence and aortic wall injuries. Avoidable costs associated with stenting in patients with CoA are unknown. METHODS: We developed an economic model to calculate potentially avoidable costs in stenting treatment of CoA in the United Kingdom over 5 years. We calculated baseline costs for the intervention and potentially avoidable complications and follow-up interventions and compared these to the costs in hypothetical scenarios with improved treatment effectiveness and complication rates. RESULTS: Baseline costs were £16 688 ($25 182) per patient. Avoidable costs ranged from £137 ($207) per patient in a scenario assuming a 10% reduction in aortic wall injuries and reinterventions at follow-up, to £1627 ($2455) in a Best-case scenario with 100% treatment success and no complications. Overall costs in the Best-case scenario were 90.2% of overall costs at Baseline. Reintervention rate at follow-up was identified as most influential lever for overall costs. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed a considerable degree of uncertainty for avoidable costs with widely overlapping 95% confidence intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvements in the treatment effectiveness and reductions in complication rates are required to realize discernible cost savings. Up to 10% of total baseline costs could be avoided in the best-case scenario. This highlights the need to pursue patient-specific treatment approaches which promise optimal outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2215-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5387244 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53872442017-04-11 Avoidable costs of stenting for aortic coarctation in the United Kingdom: an economic model Salcher, Maximilian Mcguire, Alistair Muthurangu, Vivek Kelm, Marcus Kuehne, Titus Naci, Huseyin BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Undesirable outcomes in health care are associated with patient harm and substantial excess costs. Coarctation of the aorta (CoA), one of the most common congenital heart diseases, can be repaired with stenting but requires monitoring and subsequent interventions to detect and treat disease recurrence and aortic wall injuries. Avoidable costs associated with stenting in patients with CoA are unknown. METHODS: We developed an economic model to calculate potentially avoidable costs in stenting treatment of CoA in the United Kingdom over 5 years. We calculated baseline costs for the intervention and potentially avoidable complications and follow-up interventions and compared these to the costs in hypothetical scenarios with improved treatment effectiveness and complication rates. RESULTS: Baseline costs were £16 688 ($25 182) per patient. Avoidable costs ranged from £137 ($207) per patient in a scenario assuming a 10% reduction in aortic wall injuries and reinterventions at follow-up, to £1627 ($2455) in a Best-case scenario with 100% treatment success and no complications. Overall costs in the Best-case scenario were 90.2% of overall costs at Baseline. Reintervention rate at follow-up was identified as most influential lever for overall costs. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed a considerable degree of uncertainty for avoidable costs with widely overlapping 95% confidence intervals. CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvements in the treatment effectiveness and reductions in complication rates are required to realize discernible cost savings. Up to 10% of total baseline costs could be avoided in the best-case scenario. This highlights the need to pursue patient-specific treatment approaches which promise optimal outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2215-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5387244/ /pubmed/28395657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2215-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Salcher, Maximilian Mcguire, Alistair Muthurangu, Vivek Kelm, Marcus Kuehne, Titus Naci, Huseyin Avoidable costs of stenting for aortic coarctation in the United Kingdom: an economic model |
title | Avoidable costs of stenting for aortic coarctation in the United Kingdom: an economic model |
title_full | Avoidable costs of stenting for aortic coarctation in the United Kingdom: an economic model |
title_fullStr | Avoidable costs of stenting for aortic coarctation in the United Kingdom: an economic model |
title_full_unstemmed | Avoidable costs of stenting for aortic coarctation in the United Kingdom: an economic model |
title_short | Avoidable costs of stenting for aortic coarctation in the United Kingdom: an economic model |
title_sort | avoidable costs of stenting for aortic coarctation in the united kingdom: an economic model |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28395657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2215-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT salchermaximilian avoidablecostsofstentingforaorticcoarctationintheunitedkingdomaneconomicmodel AT mcguirealistair avoidablecostsofstentingforaorticcoarctationintheunitedkingdomaneconomicmodel AT muthuranguvivek avoidablecostsofstentingforaorticcoarctationintheunitedkingdomaneconomicmodel AT kelmmarcus avoidablecostsofstentingforaorticcoarctationintheunitedkingdomaneconomicmodel AT kuehnetitus avoidablecostsofstentingforaorticcoarctationintheunitedkingdomaneconomicmodel AT nacihuseyin avoidablecostsofstentingforaorticcoarctationintheunitedkingdomaneconomicmodel AT avoidablecostsofstentingforaorticcoarctationintheunitedkingdomaneconomicmodel |