Cargando…

What do register-based studies tell us about migrant mental health? A scoping review

BACKGROUND: Previous studies investigating the mental health of migrants have shown mixed results. The increased availability of register data has led to a growing number of register-based studies in this research area. This is the first scoping review on the use of registry and record-linkage data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Kishan, Kouvonen, Anne, Close, Ciara, Väänänen, Ari, O’Reilly, Dermot, Donnelly, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28399907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0463-1
_version_ 1782520906168401920
author Patel, Kishan
Kouvonen, Anne
Close, Ciara
Väänänen, Ari
O’Reilly, Dermot
Donnelly, Michael
author_facet Patel, Kishan
Kouvonen, Anne
Close, Ciara
Väänänen, Ari
O’Reilly, Dermot
Donnelly, Michael
author_sort Patel, Kishan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies investigating the mental health of migrants have shown mixed results. The increased availability of register data has led to a growing number of register-based studies in this research area. This is the first scoping review on the use of registry and record-linkage data to examine the mental health of migrant populations. The aim of this scoping review is to investigate the topics covered and to assess the results yielded from these studies. METHODS: We used a scoping review methodology to search MedLine, PubMed, PsychINFO, Web of Science, and SCOPUS for all register-based studies on the mental health of migrants. Two reviewers screened all papers, independently, using iteratively applied inclusion and exclusion criteria. Using gradually broadening inclusion and exclusion criteria for maximum “scope,” newly published criteria developed to appraise the methodological quality of record-linkage studies were applied to eligible papers and data were extracted in a charting exercise. RESULTS: A total of 1309 papers were screened and appraised, 51 of which met the eligibility and quality criteria and were included in the review. This review identified four major domains of register-based research within the topic of migrant mental health: rates and risks of psychiatric disorders, rates and risks of suicide mortality, the use of psychotropic drugs, and health service utilisation and mental health-related hospitalisation rates. We found that whilst migrants can be at an increased risk of developing psychotic disorders and suicide mortality, they are less likely to use psychotropic medication and mental health-related services. CONCLUSIONS: This review systematically charts the register-based studies on migrants’ mental health for the first time. It shows the main topics and gaps in knowledge in this research domain, discusses the disadvantages of register-based studies, and suggests new directions for forthcoming studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0463-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5387245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53872452017-04-11 What do register-based studies tell us about migrant mental health? A scoping review Patel, Kishan Kouvonen, Anne Close, Ciara Väänänen, Ari O’Reilly, Dermot Donnelly, Michael Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: Previous studies investigating the mental health of migrants have shown mixed results. The increased availability of register data has led to a growing number of register-based studies in this research area. This is the first scoping review on the use of registry and record-linkage data to examine the mental health of migrant populations. The aim of this scoping review is to investigate the topics covered and to assess the results yielded from these studies. METHODS: We used a scoping review methodology to search MedLine, PubMed, PsychINFO, Web of Science, and SCOPUS for all register-based studies on the mental health of migrants. Two reviewers screened all papers, independently, using iteratively applied inclusion and exclusion criteria. Using gradually broadening inclusion and exclusion criteria for maximum “scope,” newly published criteria developed to appraise the methodological quality of record-linkage studies were applied to eligible papers and data were extracted in a charting exercise. RESULTS: A total of 1309 papers were screened and appraised, 51 of which met the eligibility and quality criteria and were included in the review. This review identified four major domains of register-based research within the topic of migrant mental health: rates and risks of psychiatric disorders, rates and risks of suicide mortality, the use of psychotropic drugs, and health service utilisation and mental health-related hospitalisation rates. We found that whilst migrants can be at an increased risk of developing psychotic disorders and suicide mortality, they are less likely to use psychotropic medication and mental health-related services. CONCLUSIONS: This review systematically charts the register-based studies on migrants’ mental health for the first time. It shows the main topics and gaps in knowledge in this research domain, discusses the disadvantages of register-based studies, and suggests new directions for forthcoming studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0463-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5387245/ /pubmed/28399907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0463-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Patel, Kishan
Kouvonen, Anne
Close, Ciara
Väänänen, Ari
O’Reilly, Dermot
Donnelly, Michael
What do register-based studies tell us about migrant mental health? A scoping review
title What do register-based studies tell us about migrant mental health? A scoping review
title_full What do register-based studies tell us about migrant mental health? A scoping review
title_fullStr What do register-based studies tell us about migrant mental health? A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed What do register-based studies tell us about migrant mental health? A scoping review
title_short What do register-based studies tell us about migrant mental health? A scoping review
title_sort what do register-based studies tell us about migrant mental health? a scoping review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28399907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0463-1
work_keys_str_mv AT patelkishan whatdoregisterbasedstudiestellusaboutmigrantmentalhealthascopingreview
AT kouvonenanne whatdoregisterbasedstudiestellusaboutmigrantmentalhealthascopingreview
AT closeciara whatdoregisterbasedstudiestellusaboutmigrantmentalhealthascopingreview
AT vaananenari whatdoregisterbasedstudiestellusaboutmigrantmentalhealthascopingreview
AT oreillydermot whatdoregisterbasedstudiestellusaboutmigrantmentalhealthascopingreview
AT donnellymichael whatdoregisterbasedstudiestellusaboutmigrantmentalhealthascopingreview