Cargando…

Fear of (re)injury and return to work following compensable injury: qualitative insights from key stakeholders in Victoria, Australia

BACKGROUND: Return to work (RTW) is important for recovery post-injury. Fear of (re)injury is a strong predictor of delayed RTW, and therefore much attention has been given to addressing injured workers’ fear beliefs. However, RTW is a socially-negotiated process and it may be important to consider...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bunzli, Samantha, Singh, Nabita, Mazza, Danielle, Collie, Alex, Kosny, Agnieszka, Ruseckaite, Rasa, Brijnath, Bianca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28399837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4226-7
_version_ 1782520935059816448
author Bunzli, Samantha
Singh, Nabita
Mazza, Danielle
Collie, Alex
Kosny, Agnieszka
Ruseckaite, Rasa
Brijnath, Bianca
author_facet Bunzli, Samantha
Singh, Nabita
Mazza, Danielle
Collie, Alex
Kosny, Agnieszka
Ruseckaite, Rasa
Brijnath, Bianca
author_sort Bunzli, Samantha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Return to work (RTW) is important for recovery post-injury. Fear of (re)injury is a strong predictor of delayed RTW, and therefore much attention has been given to addressing injured workers’ fear beliefs. However, RTW is a socially-negotiated process and it may be important to consider the wider social context of the injured worker, including the beliefs of the key people involved in their RTW journey. METHODS: This paper involves data collected as part of a wider study in which semi-structured interviews explored RTW from the perspectives of 93 key stakeholders: injured workers, GPs, employers and insurance case managers in Victoria, Australia. Inductive analysis of interview transcripts identified fear of (re)injury as a salient theme across all stakeholder groups. This presented an opportunity to analyse how the wider social context of the injured worker may influence fear and avoidance behaviour. Two co-authors performed inductive analysis of the theme ‘fear of (re)injury’. Codes identified in the data were grouped into five categories. Between and within category analysis revealed three themes describing the contextual factors that may influence fear avoidance and RTW behaviour. RESULTS: Theme one described how injured workers engaged in a process of weighing up the risk of (re)injury in the workplace against the perceived benefits of RTW. Theme two described how workplace factors could influence an injured workers’ perception of the risk of (re)injury in the workplace, including confidence that the source of the injury had been addressed, the availability and suitability of alternative duties. Theme three described other stakeholders’ reluctance to accept injured workers back at work because of the fear that they might reinjure themselves. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings illustrate the need for a contextualised perspective of fear avoidance and RTW behaviour that includes the beliefs of other important people surrounding the injured worker (e.g. employers, family members, GPs). Existing models of health behaviour such as The Health Beliefs Model may provide useful frameworks for interventions targeting the affective, cognitive, social, organisational and policy factors that can influence fear avoidance or facilitate RTW following injury.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5387374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53873742017-04-14 Fear of (re)injury and return to work following compensable injury: qualitative insights from key stakeholders in Victoria, Australia Bunzli, Samantha Singh, Nabita Mazza, Danielle Collie, Alex Kosny, Agnieszka Ruseckaite, Rasa Brijnath, Bianca BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Return to work (RTW) is important for recovery post-injury. Fear of (re)injury is a strong predictor of delayed RTW, and therefore much attention has been given to addressing injured workers’ fear beliefs. However, RTW is a socially-negotiated process and it may be important to consider the wider social context of the injured worker, including the beliefs of the key people involved in their RTW journey. METHODS: This paper involves data collected as part of a wider study in which semi-structured interviews explored RTW from the perspectives of 93 key stakeholders: injured workers, GPs, employers and insurance case managers in Victoria, Australia. Inductive analysis of interview transcripts identified fear of (re)injury as a salient theme across all stakeholder groups. This presented an opportunity to analyse how the wider social context of the injured worker may influence fear and avoidance behaviour. Two co-authors performed inductive analysis of the theme ‘fear of (re)injury’. Codes identified in the data were grouped into five categories. Between and within category analysis revealed three themes describing the contextual factors that may influence fear avoidance and RTW behaviour. RESULTS: Theme one described how injured workers engaged in a process of weighing up the risk of (re)injury in the workplace against the perceived benefits of RTW. Theme two described how workplace factors could influence an injured workers’ perception of the risk of (re)injury in the workplace, including confidence that the source of the injury had been addressed, the availability and suitability of alternative duties. Theme three described other stakeholders’ reluctance to accept injured workers back at work because of the fear that they might reinjure themselves. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings illustrate the need for a contextualised perspective of fear avoidance and RTW behaviour that includes the beliefs of other important people surrounding the injured worker (e.g. employers, family members, GPs). Existing models of health behaviour such as The Health Beliefs Model may provide useful frameworks for interventions targeting the affective, cognitive, social, organisational and policy factors that can influence fear avoidance or facilitate RTW following injury. BioMed Central 2017-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5387374/ /pubmed/28399837 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4226-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bunzli, Samantha
Singh, Nabita
Mazza, Danielle
Collie, Alex
Kosny, Agnieszka
Ruseckaite, Rasa
Brijnath, Bianca
Fear of (re)injury and return to work following compensable injury: qualitative insights from key stakeholders in Victoria, Australia
title Fear of (re)injury and return to work following compensable injury: qualitative insights from key stakeholders in Victoria, Australia
title_full Fear of (re)injury and return to work following compensable injury: qualitative insights from key stakeholders in Victoria, Australia
title_fullStr Fear of (re)injury and return to work following compensable injury: qualitative insights from key stakeholders in Victoria, Australia
title_full_unstemmed Fear of (re)injury and return to work following compensable injury: qualitative insights from key stakeholders in Victoria, Australia
title_short Fear of (re)injury and return to work following compensable injury: qualitative insights from key stakeholders in Victoria, Australia
title_sort fear of (re)injury and return to work following compensable injury: qualitative insights from key stakeholders in victoria, australia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28399837
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4226-7
work_keys_str_mv AT bunzlisamantha fearofreinjuryandreturntoworkfollowingcompensableinjuryqualitativeinsightsfromkeystakeholdersinvictoriaaustralia
AT singhnabita fearofreinjuryandreturntoworkfollowingcompensableinjuryqualitativeinsightsfromkeystakeholdersinvictoriaaustralia
AT mazzadanielle fearofreinjuryandreturntoworkfollowingcompensableinjuryqualitativeinsightsfromkeystakeholdersinvictoriaaustralia
AT colliealex fearofreinjuryandreturntoworkfollowingcompensableinjuryqualitativeinsightsfromkeystakeholdersinvictoriaaustralia
AT kosnyagnieszka fearofreinjuryandreturntoworkfollowingcompensableinjuryqualitativeinsightsfromkeystakeholdersinvictoriaaustralia
AT ruseckaiterasa fearofreinjuryandreturntoworkfollowingcompensableinjuryqualitativeinsightsfromkeystakeholdersinvictoriaaustralia
AT brijnathbianca fearofreinjuryandreturntoworkfollowingcompensableinjuryqualitativeinsightsfromkeystakeholdersinvictoriaaustralia