Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness of response evaluation after chemoradiation in patients with advanced oropharyngeal cancer using (18)F–FDG-PET-CT and/or diffusion-weighted MRI

BACKGROUND: Considerable variation exists in diagnostic tests used for local response evaluation after chemoradiation in patients with advanced oropharyngeal cancer. The yield of invasive examination under general anesthesia (EUA) with biopsies in all patients is low and it may induce substantial mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greuter, Marjolein JE, Schouten, Charlotte S, Castelijns, Jonas A, de Graaf, Pim, Comans, Emile FI, Hoekstra, Otto S, de Bree, Remco, Coupé, Veerle MH
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28399836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3254-0
_version_ 1782520939076911104
author Greuter, Marjolein JE
Schouten, Charlotte S
Castelijns, Jonas A
de Graaf, Pim
Comans, Emile FI
Hoekstra, Otto S
de Bree, Remco
Coupé, Veerle MH
author_facet Greuter, Marjolein JE
Schouten, Charlotte S
Castelijns, Jonas A
de Graaf, Pim
Comans, Emile FI
Hoekstra, Otto S
de Bree, Remco
Coupé, Veerle MH
author_sort Greuter, Marjolein JE
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Considerable variation exists in diagnostic tests used for local response evaluation after chemoradiation in patients with advanced oropharyngeal cancer. The yield of invasive examination under general anesthesia (EUA) with biopsies in all patients is low and it may induce substantial morbidity. We explored four response evaluation strategies to detect local residual disease in terms of diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: We built a decision-analytic model using trial data of forty-six patients and scientific literature. We estimated for four strategies the proportion of correct diagnoses, costs concerning diagnostic instruments and the proportion of unnecessary EUA indications. Besides a reference strategy, i.e. EUA for all patients, we considered three imaging strategies consisting of (18)FDG-PET-CT, diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI), or both (18)FDG-PET-CT and DW-MRI followed by EUA after a positive test. The impact of uncertainty was assessed in sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: The EUA strategy led to 96% correct diagnoses. Expected costs were €468 per patient whereas 89% of EUA indications were unnecessary. The DW-MRI strategy was the least costly strategy, but also led to the lowest proportion of correct diagnoses, i.e. 93%. The PET-CT strategy and combined imaging strategy were dominated by the EUA strategy due to respectively a smaller or equal proportion of correct diagnoses, at higher costs. However, the combination of PET-CT and DW-MRI had the highest sensitivity. All imaging strategies considerably reduced (unnecessary) EUA indications and its associated burden compared to the EUA strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Because the combined PET-CT and DW-MRI strategy costs only an additional €927 per patient, it is preferred over immediate EUA since it reaches the same diagnostic accuracy in detecting local residual disease while leading to substantially less unnecessary EUA indications. However, if healthcare resources are limited, DW-MRI is the strategy of choice because of lower costs while still providing a large reduction in unnecessary EUA indications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5387392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53873922017-04-14 Cost-effectiveness of response evaluation after chemoradiation in patients with advanced oropharyngeal cancer using (18)F–FDG-PET-CT and/or diffusion-weighted MRI Greuter, Marjolein JE Schouten, Charlotte S Castelijns, Jonas A de Graaf, Pim Comans, Emile FI Hoekstra, Otto S de Bree, Remco Coupé, Veerle MH BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Considerable variation exists in diagnostic tests used for local response evaluation after chemoradiation in patients with advanced oropharyngeal cancer. The yield of invasive examination under general anesthesia (EUA) with biopsies in all patients is low and it may induce substantial morbidity. We explored four response evaluation strategies to detect local residual disease in terms of diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: We built a decision-analytic model using trial data of forty-six patients and scientific literature. We estimated for four strategies the proportion of correct diagnoses, costs concerning diagnostic instruments and the proportion of unnecessary EUA indications. Besides a reference strategy, i.e. EUA for all patients, we considered three imaging strategies consisting of (18)FDG-PET-CT, diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI), or both (18)FDG-PET-CT and DW-MRI followed by EUA after a positive test. The impact of uncertainty was assessed in sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: The EUA strategy led to 96% correct diagnoses. Expected costs were €468 per patient whereas 89% of EUA indications were unnecessary. The DW-MRI strategy was the least costly strategy, but also led to the lowest proportion of correct diagnoses, i.e. 93%. The PET-CT strategy and combined imaging strategy were dominated by the EUA strategy due to respectively a smaller or equal proportion of correct diagnoses, at higher costs. However, the combination of PET-CT and DW-MRI had the highest sensitivity. All imaging strategies considerably reduced (unnecessary) EUA indications and its associated burden compared to the EUA strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Because the combined PET-CT and DW-MRI strategy costs only an additional €927 per patient, it is preferred over immediate EUA since it reaches the same diagnostic accuracy in detecting local residual disease while leading to substantially less unnecessary EUA indications. However, if healthcare resources are limited, DW-MRI is the strategy of choice because of lower costs while still providing a large reduction in unnecessary EUA indications. BioMed Central 2017-04-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5387392/ /pubmed/28399836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3254-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Greuter, Marjolein JE
Schouten, Charlotte S
Castelijns, Jonas A
de Graaf, Pim
Comans, Emile FI
Hoekstra, Otto S
de Bree, Remco
Coupé, Veerle MH
Cost-effectiveness of response evaluation after chemoradiation in patients with advanced oropharyngeal cancer using (18)F–FDG-PET-CT and/or diffusion-weighted MRI
title Cost-effectiveness of response evaluation after chemoradiation in patients with advanced oropharyngeal cancer using (18)F–FDG-PET-CT and/or diffusion-weighted MRI
title_full Cost-effectiveness of response evaluation after chemoradiation in patients with advanced oropharyngeal cancer using (18)F–FDG-PET-CT and/or diffusion-weighted MRI
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of response evaluation after chemoradiation in patients with advanced oropharyngeal cancer using (18)F–FDG-PET-CT and/or diffusion-weighted MRI
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of response evaluation after chemoradiation in patients with advanced oropharyngeal cancer using (18)F–FDG-PET-CT and/or diffusion-weighted MRI
title_short Cost-effectiveness of response evaluation after chemoradiation in patients with advanced oropharyngeal cancer using (18)F–FDG-PET-CT and/or diffusion-weighted MRI
title_sort cost-effectiveness of response evaluation after chemoradiation in patients with advanced oropharyngeal cancer using (18)f–fdg-pet-ct and/or diffusion-weighted mri
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28399836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3254-0
work_keys_str_mv AT greutermarjoleinje costeffectivenessofresponseevaluationafterchemoradiationinpatientswithadvancedoropharyngealcancerusing18ffdgpetctandordiffusionweightedmri
AT schoutencharlottes costeffectivenessofresponseevaluationafterchemoradiationinpatientswithadvancedoropharyngealcancerusing18ffdgpetctandordiffusionweightedmri
AT castelijnsjonasa costeffectivenessofresponseevaluationafterchemoradiationinpatientswithadvancedoropharyngealcancerusing18ffdgpetctandordiffusionweightedmri
AT degraafpim costeffectivenessofresponseevaluationafterchemoradiationinpatientswithadvancedoropharyngealcancerusing18ffdgpetctandordiffusionweightedmri
AT comansemilefi costeffectivenessofresponseevaluationafterchemoradiationinpatientswithadvancedoropharyngealcancerusing18ffdgpetctandordiffusionweightedmri
AT hoekstraottos costeffectivenessofresponseevaluationafterchemoradiationinpatientswithadvancedoropharyngealcancerusing18ffdgpetctandordiffusionweightedmri
AT debreeremco costeffectivenessofresponseevaluationafterchemoradiationinpatientswithadvancedoropharyngealcancerusing18ffdgpetctandordiffusionweightedmri
AT coupeveerlemh costeffectivenessofresponseevaluationafterchemoradiationinpatientswithadvancedoropharyngealcancerusing18ffdgpetctandordiffusionweightedmri