Cargando…
Distractor-Induced Blindness: A Special Case of Contingent Attentional Capture?
The detection of a salient visual target embedded in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) can be severely affected if target-like distractors are presented previously. This phenomenon, known as distractor-induced blindness (DIB), shares the prerequisites of contingent attentional capture (Folk,...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
University of Finance and Management in Warsaw
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28439320 http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/acp-0206-5 |
_version_ | 1782520942895824896 |
---|---|
author | Winther, Gesche N. Niedeggen, Michael |
author_facet | Winther, Gesche N. Niedeggen, Michael |
author_sort | Winther, Gesche N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The detection of a salient visual target embedded in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) can be severely affected if target-like distractors are presented previously. This phenomenon, known as distractor-induced blindness (DIB), shares the prerequisites of contingent attentional capture (Folk, Remington, & Johnston, 1992). In both, target processing is transiently impaired by the presentation of distractors defined by similar features. In the present study, we investigated whether the speeded response to a target in the DIB paradigm can be described in terms of a contingent attentional capture process. In the first experiments, multiple distractors were embedded in the RSVP stream. Distractors either shared the target’s visual features (Experiment 1A) or differed from them (Experiment 1B). Congruent with hypotheses drawn from contingent attentional capture theory, response times (RTs) were exclusively impaired in conditions with target-like distractors. However, RTs were not impaired if only one single target-like distractor was presented (Experiment 2). If attentional capture directly contributed to DIB, the single distractor should be sufficient to impair target processing. In conclusion, DIB is not due to contingent attentional capture, but may rely on a central suppression process triggered by multiple distractors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5387411 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | University of Finance and Management in Warsaw |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53874112017-04-24 Distractor-Induced Blindness: A Special Case of Contingent Attentional Capture? Winther, Gesche N. Niedeggen, Michael Adv Cogn Psychol Research Article The detection of a salient visual target embedded in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) can be severely affected if target-like distractors are presented previously. This phenomenon, known as distractor-induced blindness (DIB), shares the prerequisites of contingent attentional capture (Folk, Remington, & Johnston, 1992). In both, target processing is transiently impaired by the presentation of distractors defined by similar features. In the present study, we investigated whether the speeded response to a target in the DIB paradigm can be described in terms of a contingent attentional capture process. In the first experiments, multiple distractors were embedded in the RSVP stream. Distractors either shared the target’s visual features (Experiment 1A) or differed from them (Experiment 1B). Congruent with hypotheses drawn from contingent attentional capture theory, response times (RTs) were exclusively impaired in conditions with target-like distractors. However, RTs were not impaired if only one single target-like distractor was presented (Experiment 2). If attentional capture directly contributed to DIB, the single distractor should be sufficient to impair target processing. In conclusion, DIB is not due to contingent attentional capture, but may rely on a central suppression process triggered by multiple distractors. University of Finance and Management in Warsaw 2017-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5387411/ /pubmed/28439320 http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/acp-0206-5 Text en Copyright: © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Winther, Gesche N. Niedeggen, Michael Distractor-Induced Blindness: A Special Case of Contingent Attentional Capture? |
title | Distractor-Induced Blindness: A Special Case of Contingent
Attentional Capture? |
title_full | Distractor-Induced Blindness: A Special Case of Contingent
Attentional Capture? |
title_fullStr | Distractor-Induced Blindness: A Special Case of Contingent
Attentional Capture? |
title_full_unstemmed | Distractor-Induced Blindness: A Special Case of Contingent
Attentional Capture? |
title_short | Distractor-Induced Blindness: A Special Case of Contingent
Attentional Capture? |
title_sort | distractor-induced blindness: a special case of contingent
attentional capture? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28439320 http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/acp-0206-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT winthergeschen distractorinducedblindnessaspecialcaseofcontingentattentionalcapture AT niedeggenmichael distractorinducedblindnessaspecialcaseofcontingentattentionalcapture |