Cargando…

Distractor-Induced Blindness: A Special Case of Contingent Attentional Capture?

The detection of a salient visual target embedded in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) can be severely affected if target-like distractors are presented previously. This phenomenon, known as distractor-induced blindness (DIB), shares the prerequisites of contingent attentional capture (Folk,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winther, Gesche N., Niedeggen, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: University of Finance and Management in Warsaw 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28439320
http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/acp-0206-5
_version_ 1782520942895824896
author Winther, Gesche N.
Niedeggen, Michael
author_facet Winther, Gesche N.
Niedeggen, Michael
author_sort Winther, Gesche N.
collection PubMed
description The detection of a salient visual target embedded in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) can be severely affected if target-like distractors are presented previously. This phenomenon, known as distractor-induced blindness (DIB), shares the prerequisites of contingent attentional capture (Folk, Remington, & Johnston, 1992). In both, target processing is transiently impaired by the presentation of distractors defined by similar features. In the present study, we investigated whether the speeded response to a target in the DIB paradigm can be described in terms of a contingent attentional capture process. In the first experiments, multiple distractors were embedded in the RSVP stream. Distractors either shared the target’s visual features (Experiment 1A) or differed from them (Experiment 1B). Congruent with hypotheses drawn from contingent attentional capture theory, response times (RTs) were exclusively impaired in conditions with target-like distractors. However, RTs were not impaired if only one single target-like distractor was presented (Experiment 2). If attentional capture directly contributed to DIB, the single distractor should be sufficient to impair target processing. In conclusion, DIB is not due to contingent attentional capture, but may rely on a central suppression process triggered by multiple distractors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5387411
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher University of Finance and Management in Warsaw
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53874112017-04-24 Distractor-Induced Blindness: A Special Case of Contingent Attentional Capture? Winther, Gesche N. Niedeggen, Michael Adv Cogn Psychol Research Article The detection of a salient visual target embedded in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) can be severely affected if target-like distractors are presented previously. This phenomenon, known as distractor-induced blindness (DIB), shares the prerequisites of contingent attentional capture (Folk, Remington, & Johnston, 1992). In both, target processing is transiently impaired by the presentation of distractors defined by similar features. In the present study, we investigated whether the speeded response to a target in the DIB paradigm can be described in terms of a contingent attentional capture process. In the first experiments, multiple distractors were embedded in the RSVP stream. Distractors either shared the target’s visual features (Experiment 1A) or differed from them (Experiment 1B). Congruent with hypotheses drawn from contingent attentional capture theory, response times (RTs) were exclusively impaired in conditions with target-like distractors. However, RTs were not impaired if only one single target-like distractor was presented (Experiment 2). If attentional capture directly contributed to DIB, the single distractor should be sufficient to impair target processing. In conclusion, DIB is not due to contingent attentional capture, but may rely on a central suppression process triggered by multiple distractors. University of Finance and Management in Warsaw 2017-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5387411/ /pubmed/28439320 http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/acp-0206-5 Text en Copyright: © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Winther, Gesche N.
Niedeggen, Michael
Distractor-Induced Blindness: A Special Case of Contingent Attentional Capture?
title Distractor-Induced Blindness: A Special Case of Contingent Attentional Capture?
title_full Distractor-Induced Blindness: A Special Case of Contingent Attentional Capture?
title_fullStr Distractor-Induced Blindness: A Special Case of Contingent Attentional Capture?
title_full_unstemmed Distractor-Induced Blindness: A Special Case of Contingent Attentional Capture?
title_short Distractor-Induced Blindness: A Special Case of Contingent Attentional Capture?
title_sort distractor-induced blindness: a special case of contingent attentional capture?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387411/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28439320
http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/acp-0206-5
work_keys_str_mv AT winthergeschen distractorinducedblindnessaspecialcaseofcontingentattentionalcapture
AT niedeggenmichael distractorinducedblindnessaspecialcaseofcontingentattentionalcapture