Cargando…
Differential Effects of Reward Drive and Rash Impulsivity on the Consumption of a Range of Hedonic Stimuli
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Impulsivity has consistently been associated with over-consumption and addiction. Recent research has reconceptualized impulsivity as a two-dimensional construct (Dawe, Gullo, & Loxton, 2004). This study explores the relationship of the two components of impulsivity, reward...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Akadémiai Kiadó
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27363460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/2006.5.2016.047 |
_version_ | 1782521010118983680 |
---|---|
author | Goodwin, Belinda C. Browne, Matthew Rockloff, Matthew Loxton, Natalie |
author_facet | Goodwin, Belinda C. Browne, Matthew Rockloff, Matthew Loxton, Natalie |
author_sort | Goodwin, Belinda C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Impulsivity has consistently been associated with over-consumption and addiction. Recent research has reconceptualized impulsivity as a two-dimensional construct (Dawe, Gullo, & Loxton, 2004). This study explores the relationship of the two components of impulsivity, reward drive (RD) and rash impulsivity (RI), on a broad group of 23 hedonic consumption behaviors (e.g., gambling, substance use, eating, and media use). We tentatively grouped the behaviors into three descriptive classes: entertainment, foodstuffs, and illicit activities and substances. RESULTS: RD and RI positively predicted elevated levels of consumption in a community sample (N=5,391; 51% female), for the vast majority of the behaviors considered. However, the effect sizes for RD and RI varied significantly depending on the behavior; a pattern that appeared to be at least partially attributable to the class of consumption. Results support the view that RD is related more strongly to the consumption of products that provide social engagement or a sense of increased status; whereas RI better reflects an approach toward illicit or restricted products that are intensely rewarding with clear negative consequences. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Results support the utility of the two-factor model of impulsivity in explaining individual differences in patterns of hedonic consumption in the general population. We discuss findings in terms of strengthening current conceptualizations of RI and RD as having distinct implications with respect to health-related behaviors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5387770 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Akadémiai Kiadó |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53877702017-04-13 Differential Effects of Reward Drive and Rash Impulsivity on the Consumption of a Range of Hedonic Stimuli Goodwin, Belinda C. Browne, Matthew Rockloff, Matthew Loxton, Natalie J Behav Addict Full-Length Report BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Impulsivity has consistently been associated with over-consumption and addiction. Recent research has reconceptualized impulsivity as a two-dimensional construct (Dawe, Gullo, & Loxton, 2004). This study explores the relationship of the two components of impulsivity, reward drive (RD) and rash impulsivity (RI), on a broad group of 23 hedonic consumption behaviors (e.g., gambling, substance use, eating, and media use). We tentatively grouped the behaviors into three descriptive classes: entertainment, foodstuffs, and illicit activities and substances. RESULTS: RD and RI positively predicted elevated levels of consumption in a community sample (N=5,391; 51% female), for the vast majority of the behaviors considered. However, the effect sizes for RD and RI varied significantly depending on the behavior; a pattern that appeared to be at least partially attributable to the class of consumption. Results support the view that RD is related more strongly to the consumption of products that provide social engagement or a sense of increased status; whereas RI better reflects an approach toward illicit or restricted products that are intensely rewarding with clear negative consequences. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Results support the utility of the two-factor model of impulsivity in explaining individual differences in patterns of hedonic consumption in the general population. We discuss findings in terms of strengthening current conceptualizations of RI and RD as having distinct implications with respect to health-related behaviors. Akadémiai Kiadó 2016-07-01 2016-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5387770/ /pubmed/27363460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/2006.5.2016.047 Text en © 2016 Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial purposes, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Full-Length Report Goodwin, Belinda C. Browne, Matthew Rockloff, Matthew Loxton, Natalie Differential Effects of Reward Drive and Rash Impulsivity on the Consumption of a Range of Hedonic Stimuli |
title | Differential Effects of Reward Drive and Rash Impulsivity on the Consumption of a Range of Hedonic Stimuli |
title_full | Differential Effects of Reward Drive and Rash Impulsivity on the Consumption of a Range of Hedonic Stimuli |
title_fullStr | Differential Effects of Reward Drive and Rash Impulsivity on the Consumption of a Range of Hedonic Stimuli |
title_full_unstemmed | Differential Effects of Reward Drive and Rash Impulsivity on the Consumption of a Range of Hedonic Stimuli |
title_short | Differential Effects of Reward Drive and Rash Impulsivity on the Consumption of a Range of Hedonic Stimuli |
title_sort | differential effects of reward drive and rash impulsivity on the consumption of a range of hedonic stimuli |
topic | Full-Length Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27363460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/2006.5.2016.047 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goodwinbelindac differentialeffectsofrewarddriveandrashimpulsivityontheconsumptionofarangeofhedonicstimuli AT brownematthew differentialeffectsofrewarddriveandrashimpulsivityontheconsumptionofarangeofhedonicstimuli AT rockloffmatthew differentialeffectsofrewarddriveandrashimpulsivityontheconsumptionofarangeofhedonicstimuli AT loxtonnatalie differentialeffectsofrewarddriveandrashimpulsivityontheconsumptionofarangeofhedonicstimuli |