Cargando…

Motor Imagery Impairment in Postacute Stroke Patients

Not much is known about how well stroke patients are able to perform motor imagery (MI) and which MI abilities are preserved after stroke. We therefore applied three different MI tasks (one mental chronometry task, one mental rotation task, and one EEG-based neurofeedback task) to a sample of postac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Braun, Niclas, Kranczioch, Cornelia, Liepert, Joachim, Dettmers, Christian, Zich, Catharina, Büsching, Imke, Debener, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28458926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4653256
_version_ 1782521024539000832
author Braun, Niclas
Kranczioch, Cornelia
Liepert, Joachim
Dettmers, Christian
Zich, Catharina
Büsching, Imke
Debener, Stefan
author_facet Braun, Niclas
Kranczioch, Cornelia
Liepert, Joachim
Dettmers, Christian
Zich, Catharina
Büsching, Imke
Debener, Stefan
author_sort Braun, Niclas
collection PubMed
description Not much is known about how well stroke patients are able to perform motor imagery (MI) and which MI abilities are preserved after stroke. We therefore applied three different MI tasks (one mental chronometry task, one mental rotation task, and one EEG-based neurofeedback task) to a sample of postacute stroke patients (n = 20) and age-matched healthy controls (n = 20) for addressing the following questions: First, which of the MI tasks indicate impairment in stroke patients and are impairments restricted to the paretic side? Second, is there a relationship between MI impairment and sensory loss or paresis severity? And third, do the results of the different MI tasks converge? Significant differences between the stroke and control groups were found in all three MI tasks. However, only the mental chronometry task and EEG analysis revealed paresis side-specific effects. Moreover, sensitivity loss contributed to a performance drop in the mental rotation task. The findings indicate that although MI abilities may be impaired after stroke, most patients retain their ability for MI EEG-based neurofeedback. Interestingly, performance in the different MI measures did not strongly correlate, neither in stroke patients nor in healthy controls. We conclude that one MI measure is not sufficient to fully assess an individual's MI abilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5387846
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53878462017-04-30 Motor Imagery Impairment in Postacute Stroke Patients Braun, Niclas Kranczioch, Cornelia Liepert, Joachim Dettmers, Christian Zich, Catharina Büsching, Imke Debener, Stefan Neural Plast Research Article Not much is known about how well stroke patients are able to perform motor imagery (MI) and which MI abilities are preserved after stroke. We therefore applied three different MI tasks (one mental chronometry task, one mental rotation task, and one EEG-based neurofeedback task) to a sample of postacute stroke patients (n = 20) and age-matched healthy controls (n = 20) for addressing the following questions: First, which of the MI tasks indicate impairment in stroke patients and are impairments restricted to the paretic side? Second, is there a relationship between MI impairment and sensory loss or paresis severity? And third, do the results of the different MI tasks converge? Significant differences between the stroke and control groups were found in all three MI tasks. However, only the mental chronometry task and EEG analysis revealed paresis side-specific effects. Moreover, sensitivity loss contributed to a performance drop in the mental rotation task. The findings indicate that although MI abilities may be impaired after stroke, most patients retain their ability for MI EEG-based neurofeedback. Interestingly, performance in the different MI measures did not strongly correlate, neither in stroke patients nor in healthy controls. We conclude that one MI measure is not sufficient to fully assess an individual's MI abilities. Hindawi 2017 2017-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5387846/ /pubmed/28458926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4653256 Text en Copyright © 2017 Niclas Braun et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Braun, Niclas
Kranczioch, Cornelia
Liepert, Joachim
Dettmers, Christian
Zich, Catharina
Büsching, Imke
Debener, Stefan
Motor Imagery Impairment in Postacute Stroke Patients
title Motor Imagery Impairment in Postacute Stroke Patients
title_full Motor Imagery Impairment in Postacute Stroke Patients
title_fullStr Motor Imagery Impairment in Postacute Stroke Patients
title_full_unstemmed Motor Imagery Impairment in Postacute Stroke Patients
title_short Motor Imagery Impairment in Postacute Stroke Patients
title_sort motor imagery impairment in postacute stroke patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387846/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28458926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4653256
work_keys_str_mv AT braunniclas motorimageryimpairmentinpostacutestrokepatients
AT krancziochcornelia motorimageryimpairmentinpostacutestrokepatients
AT liepertjoachim motorimageryimpairmentinpostacutestrokepatients
AT dettmerschristian motorimageryimpairmentinpostacutestrokepatients
AT zichcatharina motorimageryimpairmentinpostacutestrokepatients
AT buschingimke motorimageryimpairmentinpostacutestrokepatients
AT debenerstefan motorimageryimpairmentinpostacutestrokepatients