Cargando…
Motor Imagery Impairment in Postacute Stroke Patients
Not much is known about how well stroke patients are able to perform motor imagery (MI) and which MI abilities are preserved after stroke. We therefore applied three different MI tasks (one mental chronometry task, one mental rotation task, and one EEG-based neurofeedback task) to a sample of postac...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28458926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4653256 |
_version_ | 1782521024539000832 |
---|---|
author | Braun, Niclas Kranczioch, Cornelia Liepert, Joachim Dettmers, Christian Zich, Catharina Büsching, Imke Debener, Stefan |
author_facet | Braun, Niclas Kranczioch, Cornelia Liepert, Joachim Dettmers, Christian Zich, Catharina Büsching, Imke Debener, Stefan |
author_sort | Braun, Niclas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Not much is known about how well stroke patients are able to perform motor imagery (MI) and which MI abilities are preserved after stroke. We therefore applied three different MI tasks (one mental chronometry task, one mental rotation task, and one EEG-based neurofeedback task) to a sample of postacute stroke patients (n = 20) and age-matched healthy controls (n = 20) for addressing the following questions: First, which of the MI tasks indicate impairment in stroke patients and are impairments restricted to the paretic side? Second, is there a relationship between MI impairment and sensory loss or paresis severity? And third, do the results of the different MI tasks converge? Significant differences between the stroke and control groups were found in all three MI tasks. However, only the mental chronometry task and EEG analysis revealed paresis side-specific effects. Moreover, sensitivity loss contributed to a performance drop in the mental rotation task. The findings indicate that although MI abilities may be impaired after stroke, most patients retain their ability for MI EEG-based neurofeedback. Interestingly, performance in the different MI measures did not strongly correlate, neither in stroke patients nor in healthy controls. We conclude that one MI measure is not sufficient to fully assess an individual's MI abilities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5387846 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53878462017-04-30 Motor Imagery Impairment in Postacute Stroke Patients Braun, Niclas Kranczioch, Cornelia Liepert, Joachim Dettmers, Christian Zich, Catharina Büsching, Imke Debener, Stefan Neural Plast Research Article Not much is known about how well stroke patients are able to perform motor imagery (MI) and which MI abilities are preserved after stroke. We therefore applied three different MI tasks (one mental chronometry task, one mental rotation task, and one EEG-based neurofeedback task) to a sample of postacute stroke patients (n = 20) and age-matched healthy controls (n = 20) for addressing the following questions: First, which of the MI tasks indicate impairment in stroke patients and are impairments restricted to the paretic side? Second, is there a relationship between MI impairment and sensory loss or paresis severity? And third, do the results of the different MI tasks converge? Significant differences between the stroke and control groups were found in all three MI tasks. However, only the mental chronometry task and EEG analysis revealed paresis side-specific effects. Moreover, sensitivity loss contributed to a performance drop in the mental rotation task. The findings indicate that although MI abilities may be impaired after stroke, most patients retain their ability for MI EEG-based neurofeedback. Interestingly, performance in the different MI measures did not strongly correlate, neither in stroke patients nor in healthy controls. We conclude that one MI measure is not sufficient to fully assess an individual's MI abilities. Hindawi 2017 2017-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5387846/ /pubmed/28458926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4653256 Text en Copyright © 2017 Niclas Braun et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Braun, Niclas Kranczioch, Cornelia Liepert, Joachim Dettmers, Christian Zich, Catharina Büsching, Imke Debener, Stefan Motor Imagery Impairment in Postacute Stroke Patients |
title | Motor Imagery Impairment in Postacute Stroke Patients |
title_full | Motor Imagery Impairment in Postacute Stroke Patients |
title_fullStr | Motor Imagery Impairment in Postacute Stroke Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Motor Imagery Impairment in Postacute Stroke Patients |
title_short | Motor Imagery Impairment in Postacute Stroke Patients |
title_sort | motor imagery impairment in postacute stroke patients |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387846/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28458926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/4653256 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT braunniclas motorimageryimpairmentinpostacutestrokepatients AT krancziochcornelia motorimageryimpairmentinpostacutestrokepatients AT liepertjoachim motorimageryimpairmentinpostacutestrokepatients AT dettmerschristian motorimageryimpairmentinpostacutestrokepatients AT zichcatharina motorimageryimpairmentinpostacutestrokepatients AT buschingimke motorimageryimpairmentinpostacutestrokepatients AT debenerstefan motorimageryimpairmentinpostacutestrokepatients |