Cargando…

Could misreporting of condom use explain the observed association between injectable hormonal contraceptives and HIV acquisition risk?()()()

OBJECTIVE: Some observational studies have suggested an association between the use of hormonal contraceptives (HC) and HIV acquisition. One major concern is that differential misreporting of sexual behavior between HC users and nonusers may generate artificially inflated risk estimates. STUDY DESIG...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Jennifer A., Heffron, Renee, Butler, Ailsa R., Celum, Connie, Baeten, Jared M., Hallett, Timothy B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28038949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.12.003
_version_ 1782521029393907712
author Smith, Jennifer A.
Heffron, Renee
Butler, Ailsa R.
Celum, Connie
Baeten, Jared M.
Hallett, Timothy B.
author_facet Smith, Jennifer A.
Heffron, Renee
Butler, Ailsa R.
Celum, Connie
Baeten, Jared M.
Hallett, Timothy B.
author_sort Smith, Jennifer A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Some observational studies have suggested an association between the use of hormonal contraceptives (HC) and HIV acquisition. One major concern is that differential misreporting of sexual behavior between HC users and nonusers may generate artificially inflated risk estimates. STUDY DESIGN: We developed an individual-based model that simulates the South African HIV serodiscordant couples analyzed for HC–HIV risk by Heffron et al. (2012). We varied the pattern of misreporting condom use between HC users and nonusers and reproduced the trial data under the assumption that HC use is not associated with HIV risk. The simulated data were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for the reported level of condom use. RESULTS: If HC users overreport condom use more than nonusers, an apparent excess risk could be observed even without any biological effect of HC on HIV acquisition. With 45% overreporting by HC users (i.e., 9 out of every 20 sex acts reported with condoms are actually unprotected) and accurate condom reporting by nonusers, a true null effect can be inflated to give an observed hazard ratio ([Formula: see text]) of 2.0. In a different population with lower overall reported condom use, artificially high [Formula: see text] s can only be generated if non-HC users underreport condom use. CONCLUSION: Differential condom misreporting can theoretically produce inflated [Formula: see text] values for an association between HC and HIV even without a true association. However, to produce a doubling of HIV risk that is entirely spurious requires substantially different levels of misreporting among HC users and nonusers, which may be unrealistic. IMPLICATIONS: Considerably differential amounts of condom use misreporting by HC users and nonusers would be needed to produce entirely spurious observed levels of excess HIV acquisition risk among HC users when there is actually no true association.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5387890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53878902017-04-17 Could misreporting of condom use explain the observed association between injectable hormonal contraceptives and HIV acquisition risk?()()() Smith, Jennifer A. Heffron, Renee Butler, Ailsa R. Celum, Connie Baeten, Jared M. Hallett, Timothy B. Contraception Original Research Article OBJECTIVE: Some observational studies have suggested an association between the use of hormonal contraceptives (HC) and HIV acquisition. One major concern is that differential misreporting of sexual behavior between HC users and nonusers may generate artificially inflated risk estimates. STUDY DESIGN: We developed an individual-based model that simulates the South African HIV serodiscordant couples analyzed for HC–HIV risk by Heffron et al. (2012). We varied the pattern of misreporting condom use between HC users and nonusers and reproduced the trial data under the assumption that HC use is not associated with HIV risk. The simulated data were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for the reported level of condom use. RESULTS: If HC users overreport condom use more than nonusers, an apparent excess risk could be observed even without any biological effect of HC on HIV acquisition. With 45% overreporting by HC users (i.e., 9 out of every 20 sex acts reported with condoms are actually unprotected) and accurate condom reporting by nonusers, a true null effect can be inflated to give an observed hazard ratio ([Formula: see text]) of 2.0. In a different population with lower overall reported condom use, artificially high [Formula: see text] s can only be generated if non-HC users underreport condom use. CONCLUSION: Differential condom misreporting can theoretically produce inflated [Formula: see text] values for an association between HC and HIV even without a true association. However, to produce a doubling of HIV risk that is entirely spurious requires substantially different levels of misreporting among HC users and nonusers, which may be unrealistic. IMPLICATIONS: Considerably differential amounts of condom use misreporting by HC users and nonusers would be needed to produce entirely spurious observed levels of excess HIV acquisition risk among HC users when there is actually no true association. Elsevier 2017-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5387890/ /pubmed/28038949 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.12.003 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Smith, Jennifer A.
Heffron, Renee
Butler, Ailsa R.
Celum, Connie
Baeten, Jared M.
Hallett, Timothy B.
Could misreporting of condom use explain the observed association between injectable hormonal contraceptives and HIV acquisition risk?()()()
title Could misreporting of condom use explain the observed association between injectable hormonal contraceptives and HIV acquisition risk?()()()
title_full Could misreporting of condom use explain the observed association between injectable hormonal contraceptives and HIV acquisition risk?()()()
title_fullStr Could misreporting of condom use explain the observed association between injectable hormonal contraceptives and HIV acquisition risk?()()()
title_full_unstemmed Could misreporting of condom use explain the observed association between injectable hormonal contraceptives and HIV acquisition risk?()()()
title_short Could misreporting of condom use explain the observed association between injectable hormonal contraceptives and HIV acquisition risk?()()()
title_sort could misreporting of condom use explain the observed association between injectable hormonal contraceptives and hiv acquisition risk?()()()
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28038949
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.12.003
work_keys_str_mv AT smithjennifera couldmisreportingofcondomuseexplaintheobservedassociationbetweeninjectablehormonalcontraceptivesandhivacquisitionrisk
AT heffronrenee couldmisreportingofcondomuseexplaintheobservedassociationbetweeninjectablehormonalcontraceptivesandhivacquisitionrisk
AT butlerailsar couldmisreportingofcondomuseexplaintheobservedassociationbetweeninjectablehormonalcontraceptivesandhivacquisitionrisk
AT celumconnie couldmisreportingofcondomuseexplaintheobservedassociationbetweeninjectablehormonalcontraceptivesandhivacquisitionrisk
AT baetenjaredm couldmisreportingofcondomuseexplaintheobservedassociationbetweeninjectablehormonalcontraceptivesandhivacquisitionrisk
AT halletttimothyb couldmisreportingofcondomuseexplaintheobservedassociationbetweeninjectablehormonalcontraceptivesandhivacquisitionrisk