Cargando…

Pollination Reservoirs in Lowbush Blueberry (Ericales: Ericaceae)

Pollinator-dependent agriculture heavily relies upon a single pollinator—the honey bee. To diversify pollination strategies, growers are turning to alternatives. Densely planted reservoirs of pollen- and nectar-rich flowers (pollination reservoirs, hereafter “PRs”) may improve pollination services p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Venturini, E. M., Drummond, F. A., Hoshide, A. K., Dibble, A. C., Stack, L. B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28069631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jee/tow285
_version_ 1782521049500352512
author Venturini, E. M.
Drummond, F. A.
Hoshide, A. K.
Dibble, A. C.
Stack, L. B.
author_facet Venturini, E. M.
Drummond, F. A.
Hoshide, A. K.
Dibble, A. C.
Stack, L. B.
author_sort Venturini, E. M.
collection PubMed
description Pollinator-dependent agriculture heavily relies upon a single pollinator—the honey bee. To diversify pollination strategies, growers are turning to alternatives. Densely planted reservoirs of pollen- and nectar-rich flowers (pollination reservoirs, hereafter “PRs”) may improve pollination services provided by wild bees. Our focal agroecosystem, lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton), exists in a simple landscape uniquely positioned to benefit from PRs. First, we contrast bee visitation rates and use of three types of PR. We consider the effects of PRs on wild bee diversity and the composition of bumble bee pollen loads. We contrast field-level crop pollination services between PRs and controls four years postestablishment. Last, we calculate the time to pay for PR investment. Social bees preferentially used clover plantings; solitary bees preferentially used wildflower plantings. On average, bumble bee pollen loads in treatment fields contained 37% PR pollen. PRs significantly increased visitation rates to the crop in year 4, and exerted a marginally significant positive influence on fruit set. The annualized costs of PRs were covered by the fourth year using the measured increase in pollination services. Our findings provide evidence of the positive impact of PRs on crop pollination services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5387985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53879852017-04-18 Pollination Reservoirs in Lowbush Blueberry (Ericales: Ericaceae) Venturini, E. M. Drummond, F. A. Hoshide, A. K. Dibble, A. C. Stack, L. B. J Econ Entomol Apiculture & Social Insects Pollinator-dependent agriculture heavily relies upon a single pollinator—the honey bee. To diversify pollination strategies, growers are turning to alternatives. Densely planted reservoirs of pollen- and nectar-rich flowers (pollination reservoirs, hereafter “PRs”) may improve pollination services provided by wild bees. Our focal agroecosystem, lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton), exists in a simple landscape uniquely positioned to benefit from PRs. First, we contrast bee visitation rates and use of three types of PR. We consider the effects of PRs on wild bee diversity and the composition of bumble bee pollen loads. We contrast field-level crop pollination services between PRs and controls four years postestablishment. Last, we calculate the time to pay for PR investment. Social bees preferentially used clover plantings; solitary bees preferentially used wildflower plantings. On average, bumble bee pollen loads in treatment fields contained 37% PR pollen. PRs significantly increased visitation rates to the crop in year 4, and exerted a marginally significant positive influence on fruit set. The annualized costs of PRs were covered by the fourth year using the measured increase in pollination services. Our findings provide evidence of the positive impact of PRs on crop pollination services. Oxford University Press 2017-04 2017-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5387985/ /pubmed/28069631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jee/tow285 Text en © The Authors 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Entomological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Apiculture & Social Insects
Venturini, E. M.
Drummond, F. A.
Hoshide, A. K.
Dibble, A. C.
Stack, L. B.
Pollination Reservoirs in Lowbush Blueberry (Ericales: Ericaceae)
title Pollination Reservoirs in Lowbush Blueberry (Ericales: Ericaceae)
title_full Pollination Reservoirs in Lowbush Blueberry (Ericales: Ericaceae)
title_fullStr Pollination Reservoirs in Lowbush Blueberry (Ericales: Ericaceae)
title_full_unstemmed Pollination Reservoirs in Lowbush Blueberry (Ericales: Ericaceae)
title_short Pollination Reservoirs in Lowbush Blueberry (Ericales: Ericaceae)
title_sort pollination reservoirs in lowbush blueberry (ericales: ericaceae)
topic Apiculture & Social Insects
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5387985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28069631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jee/tow285
work_keys_str_mv AT venturiniem pollinationreservoirsinlowbushblueberryericalesericaceae
AT drummondfa pollinationreservoirsinlowbushblueberryericalesericaceae
AT hoshideak pollinationreservoirsinlowbushblueberryericalesericaceae
AT dibbleac pollinationreservoirsinlowbushblueberryericalesericaceae
AT stacklb pollinationreservoirsinlowbushblueberryericalesericaceae