Cargando…

Percutaneous closure of post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture – A single centre experience

BACKGROUND: Post-infarction ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a rare but lethal mechanical complication of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Survival to 1 month without intervention is 6%. Given high surgical mortality, transcatheter closure has emerged as a potential strategy in selected case...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Premchand, Rajendra Kumar, Garipalli, Ravikanth, Padmanabhan, T.N.C., Manik, Geetesh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5388014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28400035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2016.10.004
_version_ 1782521053088579584
author Premchand, Rajendra Kumar
Garipalli, Ravikanth
Padmanabhan, T.N.C.
Manik, Geetesh
author_facet Premchand, Rajendra Kumar
Garipalli, Ravikanth
Padmanabhan, T.N.C.
Manik, Geetesh
author_sort Premchand, Rajendra Kumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Post-infarction ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a rare but lethal mechanical complication of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Survival to 1 month without intervention is 6%. Given high surgical mortality, transcatheter closure has emerged as a potential strategy in selected cases. Indian data on percutaneous device closure of post AMI-VSR is scarce hence we report our single-centre experience with ASD occluder device (Amplatzer and lifetech) for closure of post-AMI VSR. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this single-centre, retrospective, cohort study, patients who underwent transcatheter closure of post-MI VSR between 2005 and 2015 at KIMS Hospital were included. Primary outcome was mortality rate at 30 days. Seven patients were included in the study (mean age, 58.29 ± 9.8 years). 5 patients had anterior wall myocardial infarction (AWMI) & 2 had inferior wall myocardial infarction (IWMI). None of the patients received thrombolytic therapy. Device was successfully placed in 5 patients (71.4%) with minimal residual shunt in 2 patients (40%). Out of 7 cases 2 patients survived (29% survival rate) and are doing well on follow up at 1 and 5 years respectively. Cardiogenic shock, IWMI and serpigenious form of VSR were associated with poor outcomes. Delayed revascularization (PCI) was associated with better outcomes. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous closure is a potential technique in a selected group of patients. The presence of cardiogenic shock, IWMI and serpigeneous form of VSR constitutes important risk factors for mortality. Device implantation is in general successful with few procedure-related complications and should be applied on a case-by-case basis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5388014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53880142018-04-01 Percutaneous closure of post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture – A single centre experience Premchand, Rajendra Kumar Garipalli, Ravikanth Padmanabhan, T.N.C. Manik, Geetesh Indian Heart J Original Article BACKGROUND: Post-infarction ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a rare but lethal mechanical complication of an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Survival to 1 month without intervention is 6%. Given high surgical mortality, transcatheter closure has emerged as a potential strategy in selected cases. Indian data on percutaneous device closure of post AMI-VSR is scarce hence we report our single-centre experience with ASD occluder device (Amplatzer and lifetech) for closure of post-AMI VSR. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this single-centre, retrospective, cohort study, patients who underwent transcatheter closure of post-MI VSR between 2005 and 2015 at KIMS Hospital were included. Primary outcome was mortality rate at 30 days. Seven patients were included in the study (mean age, 58.29 ± 9.8 years). 5 patients had anterior wall myocardial infarction (AWMI) & 2 had inferior wall myocardial infarction (IWMI). None of the patients received thrombolytic therapy. Device was successfully placed in 5 patients (71.4%) with minimal residual shunt in 2 patients (40%). Out of 7 cases 2 patients survived (29% survival rate) and are doing well on follow up at 1 and 5 years respectively. Cardiogenic shock, IWMI and serpigenious form of VSR were associated with poor outcomes. Delayed revascularization (PCI) was associated with better outcomes. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous closure is a potential technique in a selected group of patients. The presence of cardiogenic shock, IWMI and serpigeneous form of VSR constitutes important risk factors for mortality. Device implantation is in general successful with few procedure-related complications and should be applied on a case-by-case basis. Elsevier 2017-04 2016-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5388014/ /pubmed/28400035 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2016.10.004 Text en © 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Cardiological Society of India. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Premchand, Rajendra Kumar
Garipalli, Ravikanth
Padmanabhan, T.N.C.
Manik, Geetesh
Percutaneous closure of post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture – A single centre experience
title Percutaneous closure of post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture – A single centre experience
title_full Percutaneous closure of post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture – A single centre experience
title_fullStr Percutaneous closure of post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture – A single centre experience
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous closure of post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture – A single centre experience
title_short Percutaneous closure of post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture – A single centre experience
title_sort percutaneous closure of post-myocardial infarction ventricular septal rupture – a single centre experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5388014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28400035
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2016.10.004
work_keys_str_mv AT premchandrajendrakumar percutaneousclosureofpostmyocardialinfarctionventricularseptalruptureasinglecentreexperience
AT garipalliravikanth percutaneousclosureofpostmyocardialinfarctionventricularseptalruptureasinglecentreexperience
AT padmanabhantnc percutaneousclosureofpostmyocardialinfarctionventricularseptalruptureasinglecentreexperience
AT manikgeetesh percutaneousclosureofpostmyocardialinfarctionventricularseptalruptureasinglecentreexperience