Cargando…

Automatic atrial capture device control in real-life practice: A multicenter experience

BACKGROUND: Device-based fully automatic pacing capture detection is useful in clinical practice and important in the era of remote care management. The main objective of this study was to verify the effectiveness of the new ACAP Confirm® algorithm in managing atrial capture in the medium term in co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giammaria, Massimo, Quirino, Gianluca, Alberio, Mariangela, Parravicini, Umberto, Cipolla, Eliana, Rossetti, Guido, Ruocco, Antonio, Senatore, Gaetano, Rametta, Francesco, Pistelli, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5388052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28416982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joa.2016.06.002
_version_ 1782521061017911296
author Giammaria, Massimo
Quirino, Gianluca
Alberio, Mariangela
Parravicini, Umberto
Cipolla, Eliana
Rossetti, Guido
Ruocco, Antonio
Senatore, Gaetano
Rametta, Francesco
Pistelli, Paolo
author_facet Giammaria, Massimo
Quirino, Gianluca
Alberio, Mariangela
Parravicini, Umberto
Cipolla, Eliana
Rossetti, Guido
Ruocco, Antonio
Senatore, Gaetano
Rametta, Francesco
Pistelli, Paolo
author_sort Giammaria, Massimo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Device-based fully automatic pacing capture detection is useful in clinical practice and important in the era of remote care management. The main objective of this study was to verify the effectiveness of the new ACAP Confirm® algorithm in managing atrial capture in the medium term in comparison with early post-implantation testing. METHODS: Data were collected from 318 patients (66% male; mean age, 73±10 years); 237 of these patients underwent device implantation and 81 box changes in 31 Italian hospitals. Atrial threshold measurements were taken manually and automatically at different pulse widths before discharge and during follow-up (7±2 months) examination. RESULTS: The algorithm worked as expected in 73% of cases, considering all performed tests. The success rate was 65% and 88% pre-discharge and during follow-up examination (p<0.001), respectively, in patients who had undergone implantation. We did not detect any difference in the performance of the algorithm as a result of the type of atrial lead used. The success rate was 70% during pre-discharge testing in patients undergoing device replacement. Considering all examination types, manual and automatic measurements yielded threshold values of 1.07±0.47 V and 1.03±0.47 V at 0.2-ms pulse duration (p=0.37); 0.66±0.37 V and 0.67±0.36 V at 0.4 ms (p=0.42); and 0.5±0.28 V and 0.5±0.29 V at 1 ms (p=0.32). CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the algorithm works before discharge, and its reliability increases over the medium term. The algorithm also proved accurate in detecting the atrial threshold automatically. The possibility of activating it does not seem to be influenced by the lead type used, but by the time from implantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5388052
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53880522017-04-17 Automatic atrial capture device control in real-life practice: A multicenter experience Giammaria, Massimo Quirino, Gianluca Alberio, Mariangela Parravicini, Umberto Cipolla, Eliana Rossetti, Guido Ruocco, Antonio Senatore, Gaetano Rametta, Francesco Pistelli, Paolo J Arrhythm Original Article BACKGROUND: Device-based fully automatic pacing capture detection is useful in clinical practice and important in the era of remote care management. The main objective of this study was to verify the effectiveness of the new ACAP Confirm® algorithm in managing atrial capture in the medium term in comparison with early post-implantation testing. METHODS: Data were collected from 318 patients (66% male; mean age, 73±10 years); 237 of these patients underwent device implantation and 81 box changes in 31 Italian hospitals. Atrial threshold measurements were taken manually and automatically at different pulse widths before discharge and during follow-up (7±2 months) examination. RESULTS: The algorithm worked as expected in 73% of cases, considering all performed tests. The success rate was 65% and 88% pre-discharge and during follow-up examination (p<0.001), respectively, in patients who had undergone implantation. We did not detect any difference in the performance of the algorithm as a result of the type of atrial lead used. The success rate was 70% during pre-discharge testing in patients undergoing device replacement. Considering all examination types, manual and automatic measurements yielded threshold values of 1.07±0.47 V and 1.03±0.47 V at 0.2-ms pulse duration (p=0.37); 0.66±0.37 V and 0.67±0.36 V at 0.4 ms (p=0.42); and 0.5±0.28 V and 0.5±0.29 V at 1 ms (p=0.32). CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the algorithm works before discharge, and its reliability increases over the medium term. The algorithm also proved accurate in detecting the atrial threshold automatically. The possibility of activating it does not seem to be influenced by the lead type used, but by the time from implantation. Elsevier 2017-04 2016-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5388052/ /pubmed/28416982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joa.2016.06.002 Text en © 2016 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Giammaria, Massimo
Quirino, Gianluca
Alberio, Mariangela
Parravicini, Umberto
Cipolla, Eliana
Rossetti, Guido
Ruocco, Antonio
Senatore, Gaetano
Rametta, Francesco
Pistelli, Paolo
Automatic atrial capture device control in real-life practice: A multicenter experience
title Automatic atrial capture device control in real-life practice: A multicenter experience
title_full Automatic atrial capture device control in real-life practice: A multicenter experience
title_fullStr Automatic atrial capture device control in real-life practice: A multicenter experience
title_full_unstemmed Automatic atrial capture device control in real-life practice: A multicenter experience
title_short Automatic atrial capture device control in real-life practice: A multicenter experience
title_sort automatic atrial capture device control in real-life practice: a multicenter experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5388052/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28416982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joa.2016.06.002
work_keys_str_mv AT giammariamassimo automaticatrialcapturedevicecontrolinreallifepracticeamulticenterexperience
AT quirinogianluca automaticatrialcapturedevicecontrolinreallifepracticeamulticenterexperience
AT alberiomariangela automaticatrialcapturedevicecontrolinreallifepracticeamulticenterexperience
AT parraviciniumberto automaticatrialcapturedevicecontrolinreallifepracticeamulticenterexperience
AT cipollaeliana automaticatrialcapturedevicecontrolinreallifepracticeamulticenterexperience
AT rossettiguido automaticatrialcapturedevicecontrolinreallifepracticeamulticenterexperience
AT ruoccoantonio automaticatrialcapturedevicecontrolinreallifepracticeamulticenterexperience
AT senatoregaetano automaticatrialcapturedevicecontrolinreallifepracticeamulticenterexperience
AT ramettafrancesco automaticatrialcapturedevicecontrolinreallifepracticeamulticenterexperience
AT pistellipaolo automaticatrialcapturedevicecontrolinreallifepracticeamulticenterexperience