Cargando…

Speeded saccadic and manual visuo-motor decisions: Distinct processes but same principles

Action decisions are considered an emergent property of competitive response activations. As such, decision mechanisms are embedded in, and therefore may differ between, different response modalities. Despite this, the saccadic eye movement system is often promoted as a model for all decisions, espe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bompas, Aline, Hedge, Craig, Sumner, Petroc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5388195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28254613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.02.002
_version_ 1782521088961413120
author Bompas, Aline
Hedge, Craig
Sumner, Petroc
author_facet Bompas, Aline
Hedge, Craig
Sumner, Petroc
author_sort Bompas, Aline
collection PubMed
description Action decisions are considered an emergent property of competitive response activations. As such, decision mechanisms are embedded in, and therefore may differ between, different response modalities. Despite this, the saccadic eye movement system is often promoted as a model for all decisions, especially in the fields of electrophysiology and modelling. Other research traditions predominantly use manual button presses, which have different response distribution profiles and are initiated by different brain areas. Here we tested whether core concepts of action selection models (decision and non-decision times, integration of automatic and selective inputs to threshold, interference across response options, noise, etc.) generalise from saccadic to manual domains. Using two diagnostic phenomena, the remote distractor effect (RDE) and ‘saccadic inhibition', we find that manual responses are also sensitive to the interference of visual distractors but to a lesser extent than saccades and during a shorter time window. A biologically-inspired model (DINASAUR, based on non-linear input dynamics) can account for both saccadic and manual response distributions and accuracy by simply adjusting the balance and relative timings of transient and sustained inputs, and increasing the mean and variance of non-decisional delays for manual responses. This is consistent with known neurophysiological and anatomical differences between saccadic and manual networks. Thus core decision principles appear to generalise across effectors, consistent with previous work, but we also conclude that key quantitative differences underlie apparent qualitative differences in the literature, such as effects being robustly reported in one modality and unreliable in another.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5388195
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53881952017-05-01 Speeded saccadic and manual visuo-motor decisions: Distinct processes but same principles Bompas, Aline Hedge, Craig Sumner, Petroc Cogn Psychol Article Action decisions are considered an emergent property of competitive response activations. As such, decision mechanisms are embedded in, and therefore may differ between, different response modalities. Despite this, the saccadic eye movement system is often promoted as a model for all decisions, especially in the fields of electrophysiology and modelling. Other research traditions predominantly use manual button presses, which have different response distribution profiles and are initiated by different brain areas. Here we tested whether core concepts of action selection models (decision and non-decision times, integration of automatic and selective inputs to threshold, interference across response options, noise, etc.) generalise from saccadic to manual domains. Using two diagnostic phenomena, the remote distractor effect (RDE) and ‘saccadic inhibition', we find that manual responses are also sensitive to the interference of visual distractors but to a lesser extent than saccades and during a shorter time window. A biologically-inspired model (DINASAUR, based on non-linear input dynamics) can account for both saccadic and manual response distributions and accuracy by simply adjusting the balance and relative timings of transient and sustained inputs, and increasing the mean and variance of non-decisional delays for manual responses. This is consistent with known neurophysiological and anatomical differences between saccadic and manual networks. Thus core decision principles appear to generalise across effectors, consistent with previous work, but we also conclude that key quantitative differences underlie apparent qualitative differences in the literature, such as effects being robustly reported in one modality and unreliable in another. Elsevier 2017-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5388195/ /pubmed/28254613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.02.002 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bompas, Aline
Hedge, Craig
Sumner, Petroc
Speeded saccadic and manual visuo-motor decisions: Distinct processes but same principles
title Speeded saccadic and manual visuo-motor decisions: Distinct processes but same principles
title_full Speeded saccadic and manual visuo-motor decisions: Distinct processes but same principles
title_fullStr Speeded saccadic and manual visuo-motor decisions: Distinct processes but same principles
title_full_unstemmed Speeded saccadic and manual visuo-motor decisions: Distinct processes but same principles
title_short Speeded saccadic and manual visuo-motor decisions: Distinct processes but same principles
title_sort speeded saccadic and manual visuo-motor decisions: distinct processes but same principles
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5388195/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28254613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.02.002
work_keys_str_mv AT bompasaline speededsaccadicandmanualvisuomotordecisionsdistinctprocessesbutsameprinciples
AT hedgecraig speededsaccadicandmanualvisuomotordecisionsdistinctprocessesbutsameprinciples
AT sumnerpetroc speededsaccadicandmanualvisuomotordecisionsdistinctprocessesbutsameprinciples