Cargando…

Assessment of the Amount of Calcium Ions Released after the use of Different Chelating Agents and Agitation Protocols

BACKGROUND: The main goal of endodontic treatment is to achieve cleaning and shaping prior to the filling process. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate, using atomic absorption spectrometry, the release of Calcium ions after the use of different chelating agents and protocols of agitation. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pedro, Fábio Luis Miranda, Costa, Laura Maria Amorim Santana, Filho, Gilberto Siebert, Guedes, Orlando Aguirre, Pereira, Thiago Machado, Borges, Alvaro Henrique
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5388784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28458729
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601711010133
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The main goal of endodontic treatment is to achieve cleaning and shaping prior to the filling process. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate, using atomic absorption spectrometry, the release of Calcium ions after the use of different chelating agents and protocols of agitation. METHOD: Ninety human canine teeth were randomly assigned to one of nine groups (n=10), as follows: 1) 0.2% Chitosan and manual agitation; 2) 0.2% Chitosan and sonic agitation; 3) 0.2% Chitosan and ultrasonic agitation; 4) 17% EDTA and manual agitation; 5) 17% EDTA and sonic agitation; 6) 17% EDTA and ultrasonic agitation; 7) distilled water and manual agitation; 8) distilled water and sonic agitation; 9) distilled water and ultrasonic agitation. Following instrumentation, all chelating substances remained inside the root canal for 3 min. Then the fluid was collected for the identification and quantification of Calcium ions. The amount of Calcium ions released in each group was compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Levene tests followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. Significance was set at 5%. RESULTS: The groups in which 0.2% Chitosan was used showed the highest concentration of Calcium ions (p<0.05). Concerning the agitation method, ultrasonic agitation showed the greatest values, followed by sonic and manual agitation (all comparisons, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The present findings suggest that, among the combinations here tested, Chitosan associated with ultrasonic agitation yielded the greatest release of Calcium ions.