Cargando…

Assessment of the Amount of Calcium Ions Released after the use of Different Chelating Agents and Agitation Protocols

BACKGROUND: The main goal of endodontic treatment is to achieve cleaning and shaping prior to the filling process. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate, using atomic absorption spectrometry, the release of Calcium ions after the use of different chelating agents and protocols of agitation. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pedro, Fábio Luis Miranda, Costa, Laura Maria Amorim Santana, Filho, Gilberto Siebert, Guedes, Orlando Aguirre, Pereira, Thiago Machado, Borges, Alvaro Henrique
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5388784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28458729
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601711010133
_version_ 1782521178151190528
author Pedro, Fábio Luis Miranda
Costa, Laura Maria Amorim Santana
Filho, Gilberto Siebert
Guedes, Orlando Aguirre
Pereira, Thiago Machado
Borges, Alvaro Henrique
author_facet Pedro, Fábio Luis Miranda
Costa, Laura Maria Amorim Santana
Filho, Gilberto Siebert
Guedes, Orlando Aguirre
Pereira, Thiago Machado
Borges, Alvaro Henrique
author_sort Pedro, Fábio Luis Miranda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The main goal of endodontic treatment is to achieve cleaning and shaping prior to the filling process. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate, using atomic absorption spectrometry, the release of Calcium ions after the use of different chelating agents and protocols of agitation. METHOD: Ninety human canine teeth were randomly assigned to one of nine groups (n=10), as follows: 1) 0.2% Chitosan and manual agitation; 2) 0.2% Chitosan and sonic agitation; 3) 0.2% Chitosan and ultrasonic agitation; 4) 17% EDTA and manual agitation; 5) 17% EDTA and sonic agitation; 6) 17% EDTA and ultrasonic agitation; 7) distilled water and manual agitation; 8) distilled water and sonic agitation; 9) distilled water and ultrasonic agitation. Following instrumentation, all chelating substances remained inside the root canal for 3 min. Then the fluid was collected for the identification and quantification of Calcium ions. The amount of Calcium ions released in each group was compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Levene tests followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. Significance was set at 5%. RESULTS: The groups in which 0.2% Chitosan was used showed the highest concentration of Calcium ions (p<0.05). Concerning the agitation method, ultrasonic agitation showed the greatest values, followed by sonic and manual agitation (all comparisons, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The present findings suggest that, among the combinations here tested, Chitosan associated with ultrasonic agitation yielded the greatest release of Calcium ions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5388784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53887842017-04-28 Assessment of the Amount of Calcium Ions Released after the use of Different Chelating Agents and Agitation Protocols Pedro, Fábio Luis Miranda Costa, Laura Maria Amorim Santana Filho, Gilberto Siebert Guedes, Orlando Aguirre Pereira, Thiago Machado Borges, Alvaro Henrique Open Dent J Article BACKGROUND: The main goal of endodontic treatment is to achieve cleaning and shaping prior to the filling process. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate, using atomic absorption spectrometry, the release of Calcium ions after the use of different chelating agents and protocols of agitation. METHOD: Ninety human canine teeth were randomly assigned to one of nine groups (n=10), as follows: 1) 0.2% Chitosan and manual agitation; 2) 0.2% Chitosan and sonic agitation; 3) 0.2% Chitosan and ultrasonic agitation; 4) 17% EDTA and manual agitation; 5) 17% EDTA and sonic agitation; 6) 17% EDTA and ultrasonic agitation; 7) distilled water and manual agitation; 8) distilled water and sonic agitation; 9) distilled water and ultrasonic agitation. Following instrumentation, all chelating substances remained inside the root canal for 3 min. Then the fluid was collected for the identification and quantification of Calcium ions. The amount of Calcium ions released in each group was compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Levene tests followed by Tukey’s post-hoc test. Significance was set at 5%. RESULTS: The groups in which 0.2% Chitosan was used showed the highest concentration of Calcium ions (p<0.05). Concerning the agitation method, ultrasonic agitation showed the greatest values, followed by sonic and manual agitation (all comparisons, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The present findings suggest that, among the combinations here tested, Chitosan associated with ultrasonic agitation yielded the greatest release of Calcium ions. Bentham Open 2017-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5388784/ /pubmed/28458729 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601711010133 Text en © 2017 Pedro et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Pedro, Fábio Luis Miranda
Costa, Laura Maria Amorim Santana
Filho, Gilberto Siebert
Guedes, Orlando Aguirre
Pereira, Thiago Machado
Borges, Alvaro Henrique
Assessment of the Amount of Calcium Ions Released after the use of Different Chelating Agents and Agitation Protocols
title Assessment of the Amount of Calcium Ions Released after the use of Different Chelating Agents and Agitation Protocols
title_full Assessment of the Amount of Calcium Ions Released after the use of Different Chelating Agents and Agitation Protocols
title_fullStr Assessment of the Amount of Calcium Ions Released after the use of Different Chelating Agents and Agitation Protocols
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the Amount of Calcium Ions Released after the use of Different Chelating Agents and Agitation Protocols
title_short Assessment of the Amount of Calcium Ions Released after the use of Different Chelating Agents and Agitation Protocols
title_sort assessment of the amount of calcium ions released after the use of different chelating agents and agitation protocols
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5388784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28458729
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601711010133
work_keys_str_mv AT pedrofabioluismiranda assessmentoftheamountofcalciumionsreleasedaftertheuseofdifferentchelatingagentsandagitationprotocols
AT costalauramariaamorimsantana assessmentoftheamountofcalciumionsreleasedaftertheuseofdifferentchelatingagentsandagitationprotocols
AT filhogilbertosiebert assessmentoftheamountofcalciumionsreleasedaftertheuseofdifferentchelatingagentsandagitationprotocols
AT guedesorlandoaguirre assessmentoftheamountofcalciumionsreleasedaftertheuseofdifferentchelatingagentsandagitationprotocols
AT pereirathiagomachado assessmentoftheamountofcalciumionsreleasedaftertheuseofdifferentchelatingagentsandagitationprotocols
AT borgesalvarohenrique assessmentoftheamountofcalciumionsreleasedaftertheuseofdifferentchelatingagentsandagitationprotocols