Cargando…

Complementary feeding at 4 versus 6 months of age for preterm infants born at less than 34 weeks of gestation: a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial

BACKGROUND: Evidence on the optimal time to initiation of complementary feeding in preterm infants is scarce. We examined the effect of initiation of complementary feeding at 4 months versus 6 months of corrected age on weight for age at 12 months corrected age in preterm infants less than 34 weeks...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gupta, Shuchita, Agarwal, Ramesh, Aggarwal, Kailash Chandra, Chellani, Harish, Duggal, Anil, Arya, Sugandha, Bhatia, Sunita, Sankar, Mari Jeeva, Sreenivas, Vishnubhatla, Jain, Vandana, Gupta, Arun Kumar, Deorari, Ashok K, Paul, Vinod K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5388893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28395845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30074-8
_version_ 1782521196886097920
author Gupta, Shuchita
Agarwal, Ramesh
Aggarwal, Kailash Chandra
Chellani, Harish
Duggal, Anil
Arya, Sugandha
Bhatia, Sunita
Sankar, Mari Jeeva
Sreenivas, Vishnubhatla
Jain, Vandana
Gupta, Arun Kumar
Deorari, Ashok K
Paul, Vinod K
author_facet Gupta, Shuchita
Agarwal, Ramesh
Aggarwal, Kailash Chandra
Chellani, Harish
Duggal, Anil
Arya, Sugandha
Bhatia, Sunita
Sankar, Mari Jeeva
Sreenivas, Vishnubhatla
Jain, Vandana
Gupta, Arun Kumar
Deorari, Ashok K
Paul, Vinod K
author_sort Gupta, Shuchita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence on the optimal time to initiation of complementary feeding in preterm infants is scarce. We examined the effect of initiation of complementary feeding at 4 months versus 6 months of corrected age on weight for age at 12 months corrected age in preterm infants less than 34 weeks of gestation. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised trial, we enrolled infants born at less than 34 weeks of gestation with no major malformation from three public health facilities in India. Eligible infants were tracked from birth and randomly assigned (1:1) at 4 months corrected age to receive complementary feeding at 4 months corrected age (4 month group), or continuation of milk feeding and initiation of complementary feeding at 6 months corrected age (6 month group), using computer generated randomisation schedule of variable block size, stratified by gestation (30 weeks or less, and 31–33 weeks). Iron supplementation was provided as standard. Participants and the implementation team could not be masked to group assignment, but outcome assessors were masked. Primary outcome was weight for age Z-score at 12 months corrected age (WAZ(12)) based on WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study growth standards. Analyses were by intention to treat. The trial is registered with Clinical Trials Registry of India, number CTRI/2012/11/003149. FINDINGS: Between March 20, 2013, and April 24, 2015, 403 infants were randomly assigned: 206 to receive complementary feeding from 4 months and 197 to receive complementary feeding from 6 months. 22 infants in the 4 month group (four deaths, two withdrawals, 16 lost to follow-up) and eight infants in the 6 month group (two deaths, six lost to follow-up) were excluded from analysis of primary outcome. There was no difference in WAZ(12) between two groups: −1·6 (SD 1·2) in the 4 month group versus −1·6 (SD 1·3) in the 6 month group (mean difference 0·005, 95% CI −0·24 to 0·25; p=0·965). There were more hospital admissions in the 4 month group compared with the 6 month group: 2·5 episodes per 100 infant-months in the 4 month group versus 1·4 episodes per 100 infant-months in the 6 month group (incidence rate ratio 1·8, 95% CI 1·0–3·1, p=0·03). 34 (18%) of 188 infants in the 4 month group required hospital admission, compared with 18 (9%) of 192 infants in the 6 month group. INTERPRETATION: Although there was no evidence of effect for the primary endpoint of WAZ(12), the higher rate of hospital admission in the 4 month group suggests a recommendation to initiate complementary feeding at 6 months over 4 months of corrected age in infants less than 34 weeks of gestation. FUNDING: Indian Council of Medical Research supported the study until Nov 14, 2015. Subsequently, Shuchita Gupta's salary was supported for 2 months by an institute fellowship from All India Institute Of Medical Sciences, and a grant by Wellcome Trust thereafter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5388893
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53888932017-04-17 Complementary feeding at 4 versus 6 months of age for preterm infants born at less than 34 weeks of gestation: a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial Gupta, Shuchita Agarwal, Ramesh Aggarwal, Kailash Chandra Chellani, Harish Duggal, Anil Arya, Sugandha Bhatia, Sunita Sankar, Mari Jeeva Sreenivas, Vishnubhatla Jain, Vandana Gupta, Arun Kumar Deorari, Ashok K Paul, Vinod K Lancet Glob Health Articles BACKGROUND: Evidence on the optimal time to initiation of complementary feeding in preterm infants is scarce. We examined the effect of initiation of complementary feeding at 4 months versus 6 months of corrected age on weight for age at 12 months corrected age in preterm infants less than 34 weeks of gestation. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised trial, we enrolled infants born at less than 34 weeks of gestation with no major malformation from three public health facilities in India. Eligible infants were tracked from birth and randomly assigned (1:1) at 4 months corrected age to receive complementary feeding at 4 months corrected age (4 month group), or continuation of milk feeding and initiation of complementary feeding at 6 months corrected age (6 month group), using computer generated randomisation schedule of variable block size, stratified by gestation (30 weeks or less, and 31–33 weeks). Iron supplementation was provided as standard. Participants and the implementation team could not be masked to group assignment, but outcome assessors were masked. Primary outcome was weight for age Z-score at 12 months corrected age (WAZ(12)) based on WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study growth standards. Analyses were by intention to treat. The trial is registered with Clinical Trials Registry of India, number CTRI/2012/11/003149. FINDINGS: Between March 20, 2013, and April 24, 2015, 403 infants were randomly assigned: 206 to receive complementary feeding from 4 months and 197 to receive complementary feeding from 6 months. 22 infants in the 4 month group (four deaths, two withdrawals, 16 lost to follow-up) and eight infants in the 6 month group (two deaths, six lost to follow-up) were excluded from analysis of primary outcome. There was no difference in WAZ(12) between two groups: −1·6 (SD 1·2) in the 4 month group versus −1·6 (SD 1·3) in the 6 month group (mean difference 0·005, 95% CI −0·24 to 0·25; p=0·965). There were more hospital admissions in the 4 month group compared with the 6 month group: 2·5 episodes per 100 infant-months in the 4 month group versus 1·4 episodes per 100 infant-months in the 6 month group (incidence rate ratio 1·8, 95% CI 1·0–3·1, p=0·03). 34 (18%) of 188 infants in the 4 month group required hospital admission, compared with 18 (9%) of 192 infants in the 6 month group. INTERPRETATION: Although there was no evidence of effect for the primary endpoint of WAZ(12), the higher rate of hospital admission in the 4 month group suggests a recommendation to initiate complementary feeding at 6 months over 4 months of corrected age in infants less than 34 weeks of gestation. FUNDING: Indian Council of Medical Research supported the study until Nov 14, 2015. Subsequently, Shuchita Gupta's salary was supported for 2 months by an institute fellowship from All India Institute Of Medical Sciences, and a grant by Wellcome Trust thereafter. Elsevier Ltd 2017-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5388893/ /pubmed/28395845 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30074-8 Text en © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Articles
Gupta, Shuchita
Agarwal, Ramesh
Aggarwal, Kailash Chandra
Chellani, Harish
Duggal, Anil
Arya, Sugandha
Bhatia, Sunita
Sankar, Mari Jeeva
Sreenivas, Vishnubhatla
Jain, Vandana
Gupta, Arun Kumar
Deorari, Ashok K
Paul, Vinod K
Complementary feeding at 4 versus 6 months of age for preterm infants born at less than 34 weeks of gestation: a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial
title Complementary feeding at 4 versus 6 months of age for preterm infants born at less than 34 weeks of gestation: a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial
title_full Complementary feeding at 4 versus 6 months of age for preterm infants born at less than 34 weeks of gestation: a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial
title_fullStr Complementary feeding at 4 versus 6 months of age for preterm infants born at less than 34 weeks of gestation: a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial
title_full_unstemmed Complementary feeding at 4 versus 6 months of age for preterm infants born at less than 34 weeks of gestation: a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial
title_short Complementary feeding at 4 versus 6 months of age for preterm infants born at less than 34 weeks of gestation: a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial
title_sort complementary feeding at 4 versus 6 months of age for preterm infants born at less than 34 weeks of gestation: a randomised, open-label, multicentre trial
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5388893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28395845
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30074-8
work_keys_str_mv AT guptashuchita complementaryfeedingat4versus6monthsofageforpreterminfantsbornatlessthan34weeksofgestationarandomisedopenlabelmulticentretrial
AT agarwalramesh complementaryfeedingat4versus6monthsofageforpreterminfantsbornatlessthan34weeksofgestationarandomisedopenlabelmulticentretrial
AT aggarwalkailashchandra complementaryfeedingat4versus6monthsofageforpreterminfantsbornatlessthan34weeksofgestationarandomisedopenlabelmulticentretrial
AT chellaniharish complementaryfeedingat4versus6monthsofageforpreterminfantsbornatlessthan34weeksofgestationarandomisedopenlabelmulticentretrial
AT duggalanil complementaryfeedingat4versus6monthsofageforpreterminfantsbornatlessthan34weeksofgestationarandomisedopenlabelmulticentretrial
AT aryasugandha complementaryfeedingat4versus6monthsofageforpreterminfantsbornatlessthan34weeksofgestationarandomisedopenlabelmulticentretrial
AT bhatiasunita complementaryfeedingat4versus6monthsofageforpreterminfantsbornatlessthan34weeksofgestationarandomisedopenlabelmulticentretrial
AT sankarmarijeeva complementaryfeedingat4versus6monthsofageforpreterminfantsbornatlessthan34weeksofgestationarandomisedopenlabelmulticentretrial
AT sreenivasvishnubhatla complementaryfeedingat4versus6monthsofageforpreterminfantsbornatlessthan34weeksofgestationarandomisedopenlabelmulticentretrial
AT jainvandana complementaryfeedingat4versus6monthsofageforpreterminfantsbornatlessthan34weeksofgestationarandomisedopenlabelmulticentretrial
AT guptaarunkumar complementaryfeedingat4versus6monthsofageforpreterminfantsbornatlessthan34weeksofgestationarandomisedopenlabelmulticentretrial
AT deorariashokk complementaryfeedingat4versus6monthsofageforpreterminfantsbornatlessthan34weeksofgestationarandomisedopenlabelmulticentretrial
AT paulvinodk complementaryfeedingat4versus6monthsofageforpreterminfantsbornatlessthan34weeksofgestationarandomisedopenlabelmulticentretrial
AT complementaryfeedingat4versus6monthsofageforpreterminfantsbornatlessthan34weeksofgestationarandomisedopenlabelmulticentretrial