Cargando…

Differential Prognostic Implications of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: Stage Adjusted Analysis From a Single High-volume Center in Asia

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC) according to disease status (early vs advanced gastric cancer) in gastric cancer patients. BACKGROUND: The prognostic implication of gastric SRC remains a subject o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chon, Hong Jae, Hyung, Woo Jin, Kim, Chan, Park, Sohee, Kim, Jie-Hyun, Park, Chan Hyuk, Ahn, Joong Bae, Kim, Hyunki, Chung, Hyun Cheol, Rha, Sun Young, Noh, Sung Hoon, Jeung, Hei-Cheul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott, Williams, and Wilkins 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5389602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27232252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001793
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC) according to disease status (early vs advanced gastric cancer) in gastric cancer patients. BACKGROUND: The prognostic implication of gastric SRC remains a subject of debate. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using the clinical records of 7667 patients including 1646 SRC patients who underwent radical gastrectomy between 2001 and 2010. A further analysis was also performed after dividing patients into three groups according to histologic subtype: SRC, well-to-moderately differentiated (WMD), and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. RESULTS: SRC patients have younger age distribution and female predominance compared with other histologic subtypes. Notably, the distribution of T stage of SRC patients was distinct, located in extremes (T1: 66.2% and T4: 20%). Moreover, the prognosis of SRC in early gastric cancer and advanced gastric cancer was contrasting. In early gastric cancer, SRC demonstrated more favorable prognosis than WMD after adjusting for age, sex, and stage. In contrast, SRC in advanced gastric cancer displayed worse prognosis than WMD. As stage increased, survival outcomes of SRC continued to worsen compared with WMD. CONCLUSIONS: Although conferring favorable prognosis in early stage, SRC has worse prognostic impact as disease progresses. The longstanding controversy of SRC on prognosis may result from disease status at presentation, which leads to differing prognosis compared with tubular adenocarinoma.