Cargando…

Processing Distracting Non-face Emotional Images: No Evidence of an Age-Related Positivity Effect

Cognitive aging may be accompanied by increased prioritization of social and emotional goals that enhance positive experiences and emotional states. The socioemotional selectivity theory suggests this may be achieved by giving preference to positive information and avoiding or suppressing negative i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Madill, Mark, Murray, Janice E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5389978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28450848
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00591
_version_ 1782521364379336704
author Madill, Mark
Murray, Janice E.
author_facet Madill, Mark
Murray, Janice E.
author_sort Madill, Mark
collection PubMed
description Cognitive aging may be accompanied by increased prioritization of social and emotional goals that enhance positive experiences and emotional states. The socioemotional selectivity theory suggests this may be achieved by giving preference to positive information and avoiding or suppressing negative information. Although there is some evidence of a positivity bias in controlled attention tasks, it remains unclear whether a positivity bias extends to the processing of affective stimuli presented outside focused attention. In two experiments, we investigated age-related differences in the effects of to-be-ignored non-face affective images on target processing. In Experiment 1, 27 older (64–90 years) and 25 young adults (19–29 years) made speeded valence judgments about centrally presented positive or negative target images taken from the International Affective Picture System. To-be-ignored distractor images were presented above and below the target image and were either positive, negative, or neutral in valence. The distractors were considered task relevant because they shared emotional characteristics with the target stimuli. Both older and young adults responded slower to targets when distractor valence was incongruent with target valence relative to when distractors were neutral. Older adults responded faster to positive than to negative targets but did not show increased interference effects from positive distractors. In Experiment 2, affective distractors were task irrelevant as the target was a three-digit array and did not share emotional characteristics with the distractors. Twenty-six older (63–84 years) and 30 young adults (18–30 years) gave speeded responses on a digit disparity task while ignoring the affective distractors positioned in the periphery. Task performance in either age group was not influenced by the task-irrelevant affective images. In keeping with the socioemotional selectivity theory, these findings suggest that older adults preferentially process task-relevant positive non-face images but only when presented within the main focus of attention.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5389978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53899782017-04-27 Processing Distracting Non-face Emotional Images: No Evidence of an Age-Related Positivity Effect Madill, Mark Murray, Janice E. Front Psychol Psychology Cognitive aging may be accompanied by increased prioritization of social and emotional goals that enhance positive experiences and emotional states. The socioemotional selectivity theory suggests this may be achieved by giving preference to positive information and avoiding or suppressing negative information. Although there is some evidence of a positivity bias in controlled attention tasks, it remains unclear whether a positivity bias extends to the processing of affective stimuli presented outside focused attention. In two experiments, we investigated age-related differences in the effects of to-be-ignored non-face affective images on target processing. In Experiment 1, 27 older (64–90 years) and 25 young adults (19–29 years) made speeded valence judgments about centrally presented positive or negative target images taken from the International Affective Picture System. To-be-ignored distractor images were presented above and below the target image and were either positive, negative, or neutral in valence. The distractors were considered task relevant because they shared emotional characteristics with the target stimuli. Both older and young adults responded slower to targets when distractor valence was incongruent with target valence relative to when distractors were neutral. Older adults responded faster to positive than to negative targets but did not show increased interference effects from positive distractors. In Experiment 2, affective distractors were task irrelevant as the target was a three-digit array and did not share emotional characteristics with the distractors. Twenty-six older (63–84 years) and 30 young adults (18–30 years) gave speeded responses on a digit disparity task while ignoring the affective distractors positioned in the periphery. Task performance in either age group was not influenced by the task-irrelevant affective images. In keeping with the socioemotional selectivity theory, these findings suggest that older adults preferentially process task-relevant positive non-face images but only when presented within the main focus of attention. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5389978/ /pubmed/28450848 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00591 Text en Copyright © 2017 Madill and Murray. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Madill, Mark
Murray, Janice E.
Processing Distracting Non-face Emotional Images: No Evidence of an Age-Related Positivity Effect
title Processing Distracting Non-face Emotional Images: No Evidence of an Age-Related Positivity Effect
title_full Processing Distracting Non-face Emotional Images: No Evidence of an Age-Related Positivity Effect
title_fullStr Processing Distracting Non-face Emotional Images: No Evidence of an Age-Related Positivity Effect
title_full_unstemmed Processing Distracting Non-face Emotional Images: No Evidence of an Age-Related Positivity Effect
title_short Processing Distracting Non-face Emotional Images: No Evidence of an Age-Related Positivity Effect
title_sort processing distracting non-face emotional images: no evidence of an age-related positivity effect
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5389978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28450848
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00591
work_keys_str_mv AT madillmark processingdistractingnonfaceemotionalimagesnoevidenceofanagerelatedpositivityeffect
AT murrayjanicee processingdistractingnonfaceemotionalimagesnoevidenceofanagerelatedpositivityeffect