Cargando…

Preference for facial averageness: Evidence for a common mechanism in human and macaque infants

Human adults and infants show a preference for average faces, which could stem from a general processing mechanism and may be shared among primates. However, little is known about preference for facial averageness in monkeys. We used a comparative developmental approach and eye-tracking methodology...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Damon, Fabrice, Méary, David, Quinn, Paul C., Lee, Kang, Simpson, Elizabeth A., Paukner, Annika, Suomi, Stephen J., Pascalis, Olivier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5390246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28406237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep46303
_version_ 1782521420167774208
author Damon, Fabrice
Méary, David
Quinn, Paul C.
Lee, Kang
Simpson, Elizabeth A.
Paukner, Annika
Suomi, Stephen J.
Pascalis, Olivier
author_facet Damon, Fabrice
Méary, David
Quinn, Paul C.
Lee, Kang
Simpson, Elizabeth A.
Paukner, Annika
Suomi, Stephen J.
Pascalis, Olivier
author_sort Damon, Fabrice
collection PubMed
description Human adults and infants show a preference for average faces, which could stem from a general processing mechanism and may be shared among primates. However, little is known about preference for facial averageness in monkeys. We used a comparative developmental approach and eye-tracking methodology to assess visual attention in human and macaque infants to faces naturally varying in their distance from a prototypical face. In Experiment 1, we examined the preference for faces relatively close to or far from the prototype in 12-month-old human infants with human adult female faces. Infants preferred faces closer to the average than faces farther from it. In Experiment 2, we measured the looking time of 3-month-old rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) viewing macaque faces varying in their distance from the prototype. Like human infants, macaque infants looked longer to faces closer to the average. In Experiments 3 and 4, both species were presented with unfamiliar categories of faces (i.e., macaque infants tested with adult macaque faces; human infants and adults tested with infant macaque faces) and showed no prototype preferences, suggesting that the prototypicality effect is experience-dependent. Overall, the findings suggest a common processing mechanism across species, leading to averageness preferences in primates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5390246
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53902462017-04-14 Preference for facial averageness: Evidence for a common mechanism in human and macaque infants Damon, Fabrice Méary, David Quinn, Paul C. Lee, Kang Simpson, Elizabeth A. Paukner, Annika Suomi, Stephen J. Pascalis, Olivier Sci Rep Article Human adults and infants show a preference for average faces, which could stem from a general processing mechanism and may be shared among primates. However, little is known about preference for facial averageness in monkeys. We used a comparative developmental approach and eye-tracking methodology to assess visual attention in human and macaque infants to faces naturally varying in their distance from a prototypical face. In Experiment 1, we examined the preference for faces relatively close to or far from the prototype in 12-month-old human infants with human adult female faces. Infants preferred faces closer to the average than faces farther from it. In Experiment 2, we measured the looking time of 3-month-old rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) viewing macaque faces varying in their distance from the prototype. Like human infants, macaque infants looked longer to faces closer to the average. In Experiments 3 and 4, both species were presented with unfamiliar categories of faces (i.e., macaque infants tested with adult macaque faces; human infants and adults tested with infant macaque faces) and showed no prototype preferences, suggesting that the prototypicality effect is experience-dependent. Overall, the findings suggest a common processing mechanism across species, leading to averageness preferences in primates. Nature Publishing Group 2017-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5390246/ /pubmed/28406237 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep46303 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Damon, Fabrice
Méary, David
Quinn, Paul C.
Lee, Kang
Simpson, Elizabeth A.
Paukner, Annika
Suomi, Stephen J.
Pascalis, Olivier
Preference for facial averageness: Evidence for a common mechanism in human and macaque infants
title Preference for facial averageness: Evidence for a common mechanism in human and macaque infants
title_full Preference for facial averageness: Evidence for a common mechanism in human and macaque infants
title_fullStr Preference for facial averageness: Evidence for a common mechanism in human and macaque infants
title_full_unstemmed Preference for facial averageness: Evidence for a common mechanism in human and macaque infants
title_short Preference for facial averageness: Evidence for a common mechanism in human and macaque infants
title_sort preference for facial averageness: evidence for a common mechanism in human and macaque infants
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5390246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28406237
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep46303
work_keys_str_mv AT damonfabrice preferenceforfacialaveragenessevidenceforacommonmechanisminhumanandmacaqueinfants
AT mearydavid preferenceforfacialaveragenessevidenceforacommonmechanisminhumanandmacaqueinfants
AT quinnpaulc preferenceforfacialaveragenessevidenceforacommonmechanisminhumanandmacaqueinfants
AT leekang preferenceforfacialaveragenessevidenceforacommonmechanisminhumanandmacaqueinfants
AT simpsonelizabetha preferenceforfacialaveragenessevidenceforacommonmechanisminhumanandmacaqueinfants
AT pauknerannika preferenceforfacialaveragenessevidenceforacommonmechanisminhumanandmacaqueinfants
AT suomistephenj preferenceforfacialaveragenessevidenceforacommonmechanisminhumanandmacaqueinfants
AT pascalisolivier preferenceforfacialaveragenessevidenceforacommonmechanisminhumanandmacaqueinfants