Cargando…

Saline versus balanced crystalloids for intravenous fluid therapy in the emergency department: study protocol for a cluster-randomized, multiple-crossover trial

BACKGROUND: Prior studies in critically ill patients suggest the supra-physiologic chloride concentration of 0.9% (“normal”) saline may be associated with higher risk of renal failure and death compared to physiologically balanced crystalloids. However, the comparative effects of 0.9% saline and bal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Self, Wesley H., Semler, Matthew W., Wanderer, Jonathan P., Ehrenfeld, Jesse M., Byrne, Daniel W., Wang, Li, Atchison, Leanne, Felbinger, Matthew, Jones, Ian D., Russ, Stephan, Shaw, Andrew D., Bernard, Gordon R., Rice, Todd W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5390477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28407811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1923-6
_version_ 1782521469378494464
author Self, Wesley H.
Semler, Matthew W.
Wanderer, Jonathan P.
Ehrenfeld, Jesse M.
Byrne, Daniel W.
Wang, Li
Atchison, Leanne
Felbinger, Matthew
Jones, Ian D.
Russ, Stephan
Shaw, Andrew D.
Bernard, Gordon R.
Rice, Todd W.
author_facet Self, Wesley H.
Semler, Matthew W.
Wanderer, Jonathan P.
Ehrenfeld, Jesse M.
Byrne, Daniel W.
Wang, Li
Atchison, Leanne
Felbinger, Matthew
Jones, Ian D.
Russ, Stephan
Shaw, Andrew D.
Bernard, Gordon R.
Rice, Todd W.
author_sort Self, Wesley H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prior studies in critically ill patients suggest the supra-physiologic chloride concentration of 0.9% (“normal”) saline may be associated with higher risk of renal failure and death compared to physiologically balanced crystalloids. However, the comparative effects of 0.9% saline and balanced fluids are largely unexamined among patients outside the intensive care unit, who represent the vast majority of patients treated with intravenous fluids. METHODS/DESIGN: This study, entitled Saline Against Lactated Ringer’s or Plasma-Lyte in the Emergency Department (SALT-ED), is a pragmatic, cluster, multiple-crossover trial at a single institution evaluating clinical outcomes of adults treated with 0.9% saline versus balanced crystalloids for intravenous fluid resuscitation in the emergency department. All adults treated in the study emergency department receiving at least 500 mL of isotonic crystalloid solution during usual clinical care and subsequently hospitalized outside the intensive care unit are included. Treatment allocation of 0.9% saline versus balanced crystalloids is assigned by calendar month, with study patients treated during the same month assigned to the same fluid type. The first month (January 2016) was randomly assigned to balanced crystalloids, with each subsequent month alternating between 0.9% saline and balanced crystalloids. For balanced crystalloid treatment, clinicians can choose either Lactated Ringer’s or Plasma-Lyte A©. The study period is set at 16 months, which will result in an anticipated estimated sample size of 15,000 patients. The primary outcome is hospital-free days to day 28, defined as the number of days alive and out of the hospital from the index emergency department visit until 28 days later. Major secondary outcomes include proportion of patients who develop acute kidney injury by creatinine measurements; major adverse kidney events by hospital discharge or day 30 (MAKE30), which is a composite outcome of death, new renal replacement therapy, and persistent creatinine elevation >200% of baseline; and in-hospital mortality. DISCUSSION: This ongoing pragmatic trial will provide the most comprehensive evaluation to date of clinical outcomes associated with 0.9% saline compared to physiologically balanced fluids in patients outside the intensive care unit. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02614040. Registered on 18 November 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1923-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5390477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53904772017-04-14 Saline versus balanced crystalloids for intravenous fluid therapy in the emergency department: study protocol for a cluster-randomized, multiple-crossover trial Self, Wesley H. Semler, Matthew W. Wanderer, Jonathan P. Ehrenfeld, Jesse M. Byrne, Daniel W. Wang, Li Atchison, Leanne Felbinger, Matthew Jones, Ian D. Russ, Stephan Shaw, Andrew D. Bernard, Gordon R. Rice, Todd W. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Prior studies in critically ill patients suggest the supra-physiologic chloride concentration of 0.9% (“normal”) saline may be associated with higher risk of renal failure and death compared to physiologically balanced crystalloids. However, the comparative effects of 0.9% saline and balanced fluids are largely unexamined among patients outside the intensive care unit, who represent the vast majority of patients treated with intravenous fluids. METHODS/DESIGN: This study, entitled Saline Against Lactated Ringer’s or Plasma-Lyte in the Emergency Department (SALT-ED), is a pragmatic, cluster, multiple-crossover trial at a single institution evaluating clinical outcomes of adults treated with 0.9% saline versus balanced crystalloids for intravenous fluid resuscitation in the emergency department. All adults treated in the study emergency department receiving at least 500 mL of isotonic crystalloid solution during usual clinical care and subsequently hospitalized outside the intensive care unit are included. Treatment allocation of 0.9% saline versus balanced crystalloids is assigned by calendar month, with study patients treated during the same month assigned to the same fluid type. The first month (January 2016) was randomly assigned to balanced crystalloids, with each subsequent month alternating between 0.9% saline and balanced crystalloids. For balanced crystalloid treatment, clinicians can choose either Lactated Ringer’s or Plasma-Lyte A©. The study period is set at 16 months, which will result in an anticipated estimated sample size of 15,000 patients. The primary outcome is hospital-free days to day 28, defined as the number of days alive and out of the hospital from the index emergency department visit until 28 days later. Major secondary outcomes include proportion of patients who develop acute kidney injury by creatinine measurements; major adverse kidney events by hospital discharge or day 30 (MAKE30), which is a composite outcome of death, new renal replacement therapy, and persistent creatinine elevation >200% of baseline; and in-hospital mortality. DISCUSSION: This ongoing pragmatic trial will provide the most comprehensive evaluation to date of clinical outcomes associated with 0.9% saline compared to physiologically balanced fluids in patients outside the intensive care unit. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02614040. Registered on 18 November 2015. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-1923-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5390477/ /pubmed/28407811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1923-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Self, Wesley H.
Semler, Matthew W.
Wanderer, Jonathan P.
Ehrenfeld, Jesse M.
Byrne, Daniel W.
Wang, Li
Atchison, Leanne
Felbinger, Matthew
Jones, Ian D.
Russ, Stephan
Shaw, Andrew D.
Bernard, Gordon R.
Rice, Todd W.
Saline versus balanced crystalloids for intravenous fluid therapy in the emergency department: study protocol for a cluster-randomized, multiple-crossover trial
title Saline versus balanced crystalloids for intravenous fluid therapy in the emergency department: study protocol for a cluster-randomized, multiple-crossover trial
title_full Saline versus balanced crystalloids for intravenous fluid therapy in the emergency department: study protocol for a cluster-randomized, multiple-crossover trial
title_fullStr Saline versus balanced crystalloids for intravenous fluid therapy in the emergency department: study protocol for a cluster-randomized, multiple-crossover trial
title_full_unstemmed Saline versus balanced crystalloids for intravenous fluid therapy in the emergency department: study protocol for a cluster-randomized, multiple-crossover trial
title_short Saline versus balanced crystalloids for intravenous fluid therapy in the emergency department: study protocol for a cluster-randomized, multiple-crossover trial
title_sort saline versus balanced crystalloids for intravenous fluid therapy in the emergency department: study protocol for a cluster-randomized, multiple-crossover trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5390477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28407811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-1923-6
work_keys_str_mv AT selfwesleyh salineversusbalancedcrystalloidsforintravenousfluidtherapyintheemergencydepartmentstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedmultiplecrossovertrial
AT semlermattheww salineversusbalancedcrystalloidsforintravenousfluidtherapyintheemergencydepartmentstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedmultiplecrossovertrial
AT wandererjonathanp salineversusbalancedcrystalloidsforintravenousfluidtherapyintheemergencydepartmentstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedmultiplecrossovertrial
AT ehrenfeldjessem salineversusbalancedcrystalloidsforintravenousfluidtherapyintheemergencydepartmentstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedmultiplecrossovertrial
AT byrnedanielw salineversusbalancedcrystalloidsforintravenousfluidtherapyintheemergencydepartmentstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedmultiplecrossovertrial
AT wangli salineversusbalancedcrystalloidsforintravenousfluidtherapyintheemergencydepartmentstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedmultiplecrossovertrial
AT atchisonleanne salineversusbalancedcrystalloidsforintravenousfluidtherapyintheemergencydepartmentstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedmultiplecrossovertrial
AT felbingermatthew salineversusbalancedcrystalloidsforintravenousfluidtherapyintheemergencydepartmentstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedmultiplecrossovertrial
AT jonesiand salineversusbalancedcrystalloidsforintravenousfluidtherapyintheemergencydepartmentstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedmultiplecrossovertrial
AT russstephan salineversusbalancedcrystalloidsforintravenousfluidtherapyintheemergencydepartmentstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedmultiplecrossovertrial
AT shawandrewd salineversusbalancedcrystalloidsforintravenousfluidtherapyintheemergencydepartmentstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedmultiplecrossovertrial
AT bernardgordonr salineversusbalancedcrystalloidsforintravenousfluidtherapyintheemergencydepartmentstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedmultiplecrossovertrial
AT ricetoddw salineversusbalancedcrystalloidsforintravenousfluidtherapyintheemergencydepartmentstudyprotocolforaclusterrandomizedmultiplecrossovertrial