Cargando…
A Rabbit Model Study to Determine the Efficacy of a Prototype Corneal Endothelium Protector during Cataract Surgery
Purpose. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a mechanical device, the P-chute, in corneal endothelium preservation during phacoemulsification in a rabbit model. Methods. Twenty-four rabbits were randomly assigned into 2 groups. One eye of each rabbit underwent phacoemulsification that simulated...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5390626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28465835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6906139 |
_version_ | 1782521499374059520 |
---|---|
author | Chew, Annabel C. Y. Chan, Anita Nongpiur, Monisha E. Peh, Gary Barathi, Veluchamy A. Lwin, Nyein C. Ong, Charles Perera, Shamira |
author_facet | Chew, Annabel C. Y. Chan, Anita Nongpiur, Monisha E. Peh, Gary Barathi, Veluchamy A. Lwin, Nyein C. Ong, Charles Perera, Shamira |
author_sort | Chew, Annabel C. Y. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a mechanical device, the P-chute, in corneal endothelium preservation during phacoemulsification in a rabbit model. Methods. Twenty-four rabbits were randomly assigned into 2 groups. One eye of each rabbit underwent phacoemulsification that simulated the removal of a dense nucleus, with or without the P-chute. Serial slit-lamp examinations, anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT) scans, and specular microscopy were performed. Three rabbits from each group were sacrificed on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 5, 7, and 14. Histological analysis of the corneas was performed. Results. There was a trend towards lesser endothelial cell loss for the P-chute group at POD1 (4.9% versus 12.5%, p = 0.53), POD5 (10.4% versus 12.2%, p = 0.77), and POD7 (10.5% versus 17.2%, p = 0.52). There was no significant difference in the corneal thickness (p = >0.05) between the 2 groups. The insertion of the device was challenging. The use of the P-chute only added an extra 15% to the surgical time. Conclusions. There was a trend towards better endothelium preservation with the P-chute even though the results were not statistically significant. We believe that the device could be useful in certain surgical situations. Further work is needed to improve the device insertion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5390626 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53906262017-05-02 A Rabbit Model Study to Determine the Efficacy of a Prototype Corneal Endothelium Protector during Cataract Surgery Chew, Annabel C. Y. Chan, Anita Nongpiur, Monisha E. Peh, Gary Barathi, Veluchamy A. Lwin, Nyein C. Ong, Charles Perera, Shamira J Ophthalmol Research Article Purpose. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a mechanical device, the P-chute, in corneal endothelium preservation during phacoemulsification in a rabbit model. Methods. Twenty-four rabbits were randomly assigned into 2 groups. One eye of each rabbit underwent phacoemulsification that simulated the removal of a dense nucleus, with or without the P-chute. Serial slit-lamp examinations, anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT) scans, and specular microscopy were performed. Three rabbits from each group were sacrificed on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 5, 7, and 14. Histological analysis of the corneas was performed. Results. There was a trend towards lesser endothelial cell loss for the P-chute group at POD1 (4.9% versus 12.5%, p = 0.53), POD5 (10.4% versus 12.2%, p = 0.77), and POD7 (10.5% versus 17.2%, p = 0.52). There was no significant difference in the corneal thickness (p = >0.05) between the 2 groups. The insertion of the device was challenging. The use of the P-chute only added an extra 15% to the surgical time. Conclusions. There was a trend towards better endothelium preservation with the P-chute even though the results were not statistically significant. We believe that the device could be useful in certain surgical situations. Further work is needed to improve the device insertion. Hindawi 2017 2017-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5390626/ /pubmed/28465835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6906139 Text en Copyright © 2017 Annabel C. Y. Chew et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chew, Annabel C. Y. Chan, Anita Nongpiur, Monisha E. Peh, Gary Barathi, Veluchamy A. Lwin, Nyein C. Ong, Charles Perera, Shamira A Rabbit Model Study to Determine the Efficacy of a Prototype Corneal Endothelium Protector during Cataract Surgery |
title | A Rabbit Model Study to Determine the Efficacy of a Prototype Corneal Endothelium Protector during Cataract Surgery |
title_full | A Rabbit Model Study to Determine the Efficacy of a Prototype Corneal Endothelium Protector during Cataract Surgery |
title_fullStr | A Rabbit Model Study to Determine the Efficacy of a Prototype Corneal Endothelium Protector during Cataract Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | A Rabbit Model Study to Determine the Efficacy of a Prototype Corneal Endothelium Protector during Cataract Surgery |
title_short | A Rabbit Model Study to Determine the Efficacy of a Prototype Corneal Endothelium Protector during Cataract Surgery |
title_sort | rabbit model study to determine the efficacy of a prototype corneal endothelium protector during cataract surgery |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5390626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28465835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6906139 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chewannabelcy arabbitmodelstudytodeterminetheefficacyofaprototypecornealendotheliumprotectorduringcataractsurgery AT chananita arabbitmodelstudytodeterminetheefficacyofaprototypecornealendotheliumprotectorduringcataractsurgery AT nongpiurmonishae arabbitmodelstudytodeterminetheefficacyofaprototypecornealendotheliumprotectorduringcataractsurgery AT pehgary arabbitmodelstudytodeterminetheefficacyofaprototypecornealendotheliumprotectorduringcataractsurgery AT barathiveluchamya arabbitmodelstudytodeterminetheefficacyofaprototypecornealendotheliumprotectorduringcataractsurgery AT lwinnyeinc arabbitmodelstudytodeterminetheefficacyofaprototypecornealendotheliumprotectorduringcataractsurgery AT ongcharles arabbitmodelstudytodeterminetheefficacyofaprototypecornealendotheliumprotectorduringcataractsurgery AT pererashamira arabbitmodelstudytodeterminetheefficacyofaprototypecornealendotheliumprotectorduringcataractsurgery AT chewannabelcy rabbitmodelstudytodeterminetheefficacyofaprototypecornealendotheliumprotectorduringcataractsurgery AT chananita rabbitmodelstudytodeterminetheefficacyofaprototypecornealendotheliumprotectorduringcataractsurgery AT nongpiurmonishae rabbitmodelstudytodeterminetheefficacyofaprototypecornealendotheliumprotectorduringcataractsurgery AT pehgary rabbitmodelstudytodeterminetheefficacyofaprototypecornealendotheliumprotectorduringcataractsurgery AT barathiveluchamya rabbitmodelstudytodeterminetheefficacyofaprototypecornealendotheliumprotectorduringcataractsurgery AT lwinnyeinc rabbitmodelstudytodeterminetheefficacyofaprototypecornealendotheliumprotectorduringcataractsurgery AT ongcharles rabbitmodelstudytodeterminetheefficacyofaprototypecornealendotheliumprotectorduringcataractsurgery AT pererashamira rabbitmodelstudytodeterminetheefficacyofaprototypecornealendotheliumprotectorduringcataractsurgery |