Cargando…
Pain perception description after advanced surface ablation
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to characterize the evolution of ocular pain after advanced surface ablation (ASA) to improve strategies in postoperative pain management. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, descriptive, cohort study. The inclusion criteria were healthy individuals...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5391165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28435216 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S134542 |
_version_ | 1783229227976359936 |
---|---|
author | Sobas, Eva M Videla, Sebastián Vázquez, Amanda Fernández, Itziar Maldonado, Miguel J Pastor, José-Carlos |
author_facet | Sobas, Eva M Videla, Sebastián Vázquez, Amanda Fernández, Itziar Maldonado, Miguel J Pastor, José-Carlos |
author_sort | Sobas, Eva M |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to characterize the evolution of ocular pain after advanced surface ablation (ASA) to improve strategies in postoperative pain management. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, descriptive, cohort study. The inclusion criteria were healthy individuals ≥18 years old receiving bilateral alcohol-assisted surface ablation with epithelial removal. Pain intensity was evaluated with the visual analog scale (VAS) and the numeric pain rating scale before and after surgery. Comorbidities (photophobia, burning, tearing, and foreign body sensation) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) questionnaire were evaluated before and at 6 hours after surgery. Postoperative treatments included cold patch, topical cold antibiotics, topical steroids, and benzodiazepines. RESULTS: Thirty-two consecutive patients having similar profiles of postoperative pain evolution were included. At 0.5 hour after ASA, the pain score by VAS was 37±20 mm, and the maximum pain, 61±31 mm, occurred at 24 hours. Afterward, it decreased progressively until 72 hours after surgery (19±20 mm). Most patients (81%) scored >60 mm, and 44% required rescue medication. Among the comorbidities, all patients had photophobia and 84% had burning sensation. At 6 hours, the HAD score was 5.4±3.9, within the range of values considered as normal. CONCLUSION: Postoperative acute ocular pain after ASA showed a characteristic evolution over time. Recognition of the pattern could be important for improving the acceptance of ASA and for improving strategies in pain management in the postoperative period. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5391165 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53911652017-04-21 Pain perception description after advanced surface ablation Sobas, Eva M Videla, Sebastián Vázquez, Amanda Fernández, Itziar Maldonado, Miguel J Pastor, José-Carlos Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to characterize the evolution of ocular pain after advanced surface ablation (ASA) to improve strategies in postoperative pain management. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, descriptive, cohort study. The inclusion criteria were healthy individuals ≥18 years old receiving bilateral alcohol-assisted surface ablation with epithelial removal. Pain intensity was evaluated with the visual analog scale (VAS) and the numeric pain rating scale before and after surgery. Comorbidities (photophobia, burning, tearing, and foreign body sensation) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) questionnaire were evaluated before and at 6 hours after surgery. Postoperative treatments included cold patch, topical cold antibiotics, topical steroids, and benzodiazepines. RESULTS: Thirty-two consecutive patients having similar profiles of postoperative pain evolution were included. At 0.5 hour after ASA, the pain score by VAS was 37±20 mm, and the maximum pain, 61±31 mm, occurred at 24 hours. Afterward, it decreased progressively until 72 hours after surgery (19±20 mm). Most patients (81%) scored >60 mm, and 44% required rescue medication. Among the comorbidities, all patients had photophobia and 84% had burning sensation. At 6 hours, the HAD score was 5.4±3.9, within the range of values considered as normal. CONCLUSION: Postoperative acute ocular pain after ASA showed a characteristic evolution over time. Recognition of the pattern could be important for improving the acceptance of ASA and for improving strategies in pain management in the postoperative period. Dove Medical Press 2017-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5391165/ /pubmed/28435216 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S134542 Text en © 2017 Sobas et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Sobas, Eva M Videla, Sebastián Vázquez, Amanda Fernández, Itziar Maldonado, Miguel J Pastor, José-Carlos Pain perception description after advanced surface ablation |
title | Pain perception description after advanced surface ablation |
title_full | Pain perception description after advanced surface ablation |
title_fullStr | Pain perception description after advanced surface ablation |
title_full_unstemmed | Pain perception description after advanced surface ablation |
title_short | Pain perception description after advanced surface ablation |
title_sort | pain perception description after advanced surface ablation |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5391165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28435216 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S134542 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sobasevam painperceptiondescriptionafteradvancedsurfaceablation AT videlasebastian painperceptiondescriptionafteradvancedsurfaceablation AT vazquezamanda painperceptiondescriptionafteradvancedsurfaceablation AT fernandezitziar painperceptiondescriptionafteradvancedsurfaceablation AT maldonadomiguelj painperceptiondescriptionafteradvancedsurfaceablation AT pastorjosecarlos painperceptiondescriptionafteradvancedsurfaceablation |