Cargando…

Evaluating the Functional Results and Complications of Autograft vs Allograft Use for Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Systematic Review

The aim of our review is to identify the reconstruction technique that has a superior functional outcome and decreased number of complications for the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). We have divided our review into 2 sections. Our primary question evaluates the functional results and complications...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pujji, Ojas, Keswani, Nikita, Collier, Naomi, Black, Marion, Doos, Lucy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5391514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28458784
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2017.6833
_version_ 1783229282602975232
author Pujji, Ojas
Keswani, Nikita
Collier, Naomi
Black, Marion
Doos, Lucy
author_facet Pujji, Ojas
Keswani, Nikita
Collier, Naomi
Black, Marion
Doos, Lucy
author_sort Pujji, Ojas
collection PubMed
description The aim of our review is to identify the reconstruction technique that has a superior functional outcome and decreased number of complications for the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). We have divided our review into 2 sections. Our primary question evaluates the functional results and complications of autografts compared to allografts for ACL reconstruction. Our subsidiary question evaluates the functional results and complications of bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts compared to hamstring tendon autografts. We conducted a systematic review (SR) based on high quality evidence provided by Cochrane, PubMed and National Health Service evidence searches for papers comparing different ACL reconstruction techniques. Results from 2 primary studies, 1 SR and 1 meta-analysis showed no significant statistical difference when comparing clinical outcomes such as pain, range of motion, laxity, International Knee Documentation Committee score, single assessment numerical evaluation score, Tegner activity score and patient reported satisfaction with regards to autografts vs allografts. Allografts had worse outcomes for postoperative tibial tunnelling and graft failure. Results of 3 SRs showed statistically significant differences in incidence of anterior knee pain, kneeling pain and knee stability, which were all found to be greater amongst those who had received a BPTB autograft. Knee extension was significantly reduced in patients with BPTB grafts when compared to patients with Hamstring tendon autografts. However, with regards to return to prior levels of activity, there was no statistically significant difference between those that received BPTB autografts and those that received Hamstring tendon autografts. Autograft reconstruction of the ACL was shown to provide better postoperative outcomes when compared to allograft reconstruction, although the difference was not statistically significant. When researching different autograft options BPTB autografts were associated with greater pain but also greater stability of the knee joint postoperatively when compared to hamstring tendon autografts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5391514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53915142017-04-28 Evaluating the Functional Results and Complications of Autograft vs Allograft Use for Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Systematic Review Pujji, Ojas Keswani, Nikita Collier, Naomi Black, Marion Doos, Lucy Orthop Rev (Pavia) Review The aim of our review is to identify the reconstruction technique that has a superior functional outcome and decreased number of complications for the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). We have divided our review into 2 sections. Our primary question evaluates the functional results and complications of autografts compared to allografts for ACL reconstruction. Our subsidiary question evaluates the functional results and complications of bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts compared to hamstring tendon autografts. We conducted a systematic review (SR) based on high quality evidence provided by Cochrane, PubMed and National Health Service evidence searches for papers comparing different ACL reconstruction techniques. Results from 2 primary studies, 1 SR and 1 meta-analysis showed no significant statistical difference when comparing clinical outcomes such as pain, range of motion, laxity, International Knee Documentation Committee score, single assessment numerical evaluation score, Tegner activity score and patient reported satisfaction with regards to autografts vs allografts. Allografts had worse outcomes for postoperative tibial tunnelling and graft failure. Results of 3 SRs showed statistically significant differences in incidence of anterior knee pain, kneeling pain and knee stability, which were all found to be greater amongst those who had received a BPTB autograft. Knee extension was significantly reduced in patients with BPTB grafts when compared to patients with Hamstring tendon autografts. However, with regards to return to prior levels of activity, there was no statistically significant difference between those that received BPTB autografts and those that received Hamstring tendon autografts. Autograft reconstruction of the ACL was shown to provide better postoperative outcomes when compared to allograft reconstruction, although the difference was not statistically significant. When researching different autograft options BPTB autografts were associated with greater pain but also greater stability of the knee joint postoperatively when compared to hamstring tendon autografts. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2017-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5391514/ /pubmed/28458784 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2017.6833 Text en ©Copyright O. Pujji et al., 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Pujji, Ojas
Keswani, Nikita
Collier, Naomi
Black, Marion
Doos, Lucy
Evaluating the Functional Results and Complications of Autograft vs Allograft Use for Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Systematic Review
title Evaluating the Functional Results and Complications of Autograft vs Allograft Use for Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Systematic Review
title_full Evaluating the Functional Results and Complications of Autograft vs Allograft Use for Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Evaluating the Functional Results and Complications of Autograft vs Allograft Use for Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Functional Results and Complications of Autograft vs Allograft Use for Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Systematic Review
title_short Evaluating the Functional Results and Complications of Autograft vs Allograft Use for Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Systematic Review
title_sort evaluating the functional results and complications of autograft vs allograft use for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5391514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28458784
http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/or.2017.6833
work_keys_str_mv AT pujjiojas evaluatingthefunctionalresultsandcomplicationsofautograftvsallograftuseforreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateligamentasystematicreview
AT keswaninikita evaluatingthefunctionalresultsandcomplicationsofautograftvsallograftuseforreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateligamentasystematicreview
AT colliernaomi evaluatingthefunctionalresultsandcomplicationsofautograftvsallograftuseforreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateligamentasystematicreview
AT blackmarion evaluatingthefunctionalresultsandcomplicationsofautograftvsallograftuseforreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateligamentasystematicreview
AT dooslucy evaluatingthefunctionalresultsandcomplicationsofautograftvsallograftuseforreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateligamentasystematicreview