Cargando…

Human resource information systems in health care: a systematic evidence review

Objective: This systematic review aimed to: (1) determine the prevalence and scope of existing research on human resource information systems (HRIS) in health organizations; (2) analyze, classify, and synthesize evidence on the processes and impacts of HRIS development, implementation, and adoption;...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tursunbayeva, Aizhan, Bunduchi, Raluca, Franco, Massimo, Pagliari, Claudia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5391731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27707821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw141
_version_ 1783229330832228352
author Tursunbayeva, Aizhan
Bunduchi, Raluca
Franco, Massimo
Pagliari, Claudia
author_facet Tursunbayeva, Aizhan
Bunduchi, Raluca
Franco, Massimo
Pagliari, Claudia
author_sort Tursunbayeva, Aizhan
collection PubMed
description Objective: This systematic review aimed to: (1) determine the prevalence and scope of existing research on human resource information systems (HRIS) in health organizations; (2) analyze, classify, and synthesize evidence on the processes and impacts of HRIS development, implementation, and adoption; and (3) generate recommendations for HRIS research, practice, and policy, with reference to the needs of different stakeholders. Methods: A structured search strategy was used to interrogate 10 electronic databases indexing research from the health, social, management, technology, and interdisciplinary sciences, alongside gray literature sources and reference lists of qualifying studies. There were no restrictions on language or publication year. Two reviewers screened publications, extracted data, and coded findings according to the innovation stages covered in the studies. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program checklist was adopted to assess study quality. The process of study selection was charted using a Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) diagram. Results: Of the 6824 publications identified by the search strategy, 68, covering 42 studies, were included for final analysis. Research on HRIS in health was interdisciplinary, often atheoretical, conducted primarily in the hospital sector of high-income economies, and largely focused uncritically on use and realized benefits. Discussion and Conclusions: While studies of HRIS in health exist, the overall lack of evaluative research raises unanswered questions about their capacity to improve quality and efficiency and enable learning health systems, as well as how sociotechnical complexity influences implementation and effectiveness. We offer this analysis to decision makers and managers considering or currently implementing an HRIS, and make recommendations for further research. Trial Registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42015023581. http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42015023581#.VYu1BPlVjDU.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5391731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53917312017-04-21 Human resource information systems in health care: a systematic evidence review Tursunbayeva, Aizhan Bunduchi, Raluca Franco, Massimo Pagliari, Claudia J Am Med Inform Assoc Reviews Objective: This systematic review aimed to: (1) determine the prevalence and scope of existing research on human resource information systems (HRIS) in health organizations; (2) analyze, classify, and synthesize evidence on the processes and impacts of HRIS development, implementation, and adoption; and (3) generate recommendations for HRIS research, practice, and policy, with reference to the needs of different stakeholders. Methods: A structured search strategy was used to interrogate 10 electronic databases indexing research from the health, social, management, technology, and interdisciplinary sciences, alongside gray literature sources and reference lists of qualifying studies. There were no restrictions on language or publication year. Two reviewers screened publications, extracted data, and coded findings according to the innovation stages covered in the studies. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program checklist was adopted to assess study quality. The process of study selection was charted using a Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) diagram. Results: Of the 6824 publications identified by the search strategy, 68, covering 42 studies, were included for final analysis. Research on HRIS in health was interdisciplinary, often atheoretical, conducted primarily in the hospital sector of high-income economies, and largely focused uncritically on use and realized benefits. Discussion and Conclusions: While studies of HRIS in health exist, the overall lack of evaluative research raises unanswered questions about their capacity to improve quality and efficiency and enable learning health systems, as well as how sociotechnical complexity influences implementation and effectiveness. We offer this analysis to decision makers and managers considering or currently implementing an HRIS, and make recommendations for further research. Trial Registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO): CRD42015023581. http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.asp?ID=CRD42015023581#.VYu1BPlVjDU. Oxford University Press 2017-05 2016-10-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5391731/ /pubmed/27707821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw141 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Tursunbayeva, Aizhan
Bunduchi, Raluca
Franco, Massimo
Pagliari, Claudia
Human resource information systems in health care: a systematic evidence review
title Human resource information systems in health care: a systematic evidence review
title_full Human resource information systems in health care: a systematic evidence review
title_fullStr Human resource information systems in health care: a systematic evidence review
title_full_unstemmed Human resource information systems in health care: a systematic evidence review
title_short Human resource information systems in health care: a systematic evidence review
title_sort human resource information systems in health care: a systematic evidence review
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5391731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27707821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw141
work_keys_str_mv AT tursunbayevaaizhan humanresourceinformationsystemsinhealthcareasystematicevidencereview
AT bunduchiraluca humanresourceinformationsystemsinhealthcareasystematicevidencereview
AT francomassimo humanresourceinformationsystemsinhealthcareasystematicevidencereview
AT pagliariclaudia humanresourceinformationsystemsinhealthcareasystematicevidencereview