Cargando…
State Emergency Department Opioid Guidelines: Current Status
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and categorize current state-sponsored opioid guidelines for the practice of emergency medicine (EM). METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of EM-specific opioid prescribing guidelines and/or policies in each state to determine current s...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5391881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28435482 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.12.30854 |
_version_ | 1783229351956840448 |
---|---|
author | Broida, Robert I. Gronowski, Tanner Kalnow, Andrew F. Little, Andrew G. Lloyd, Christopher M. |
author_facet | Broida, Robert I. Gronowski, Tanner Kalnow, Andrew F. Little, Andrew G. Lloyd, Christopher M. |
author_sort | Broida, Robert I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and categorize current state-sponsored opioid guidelines for the practice of emergency medicine (EM). METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of EM-specific opioid prescribing guidelines and/or policies in each state to determine current state involvement in EM opioid prescribing, as well as to evaluate some of the specifics of each guideline or policy. The search was conducted using an online query and a follow-up email request to each state chapter of ACEP. RESULTS: We found that 17 states had emergency department-specific guidelines. We further organized the guidelines into four categories: limiting prescriptions for opioids with 67 total recommendations; preventing/diverting abuse with 56 total recommendations; addiction-related guidelines with 29 total recommendations; and a community resources section with 24 total recommendations. Our results showed that current state guidelines focus on providers limiting opioid pain prescriptions and vetting patients for possible abuse/diversion. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the 17 states that have addressed opioid prescribing guidelines and categorizes their efforts to date. It is hoped that this study will provide the basis for similar efforts in other states. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5391881 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53918812017-04-21 State Emergency Department Opioid Guidelines: Current Status Broida, Robert I. Gronowski, Tanner Kalnow, Andrew F. Little, Andrew G. Lloyd, Christopher M. West J Emerg Med Behavioral Health INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and categorize current state-sponsored opioid guidelines for the practice of emergency medicine (EM). METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search of EM-specific opioid prescribing guidelines and/or policies in each state to determine current state involvement in EM opioid prescribing, as well as to evaluate some of the specifics of each guideline or policy. The search was conducted using an online query and a follow-up email request to each state chapter of ACEP. RESULTS: We found that 17 states had emergency department-specific guidelines. We further organized the guidelines into four categories: limiting prescriptions for opioids with 67 total recommendations; preventing/diverting abuse with 56 total recommendations; addiction-related guidelines with 29 total recommendations; and a community resources section with 24 total recommendations. Our results showed that current state guidelines focus on providers limiting opioid pain prescriptions and vetting patients for possible abuse/diversion. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the 17 states that have addressed opioid prescribing guidelines and categorizes their efforts to date. It is hoped that this study will provide the basis for similar efforts in other states. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2017-04 2017-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5391881/ /pubmed/28435482 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.12.30854 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Broida et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Behavioral Health Broida, Robert I. Gronowski, Tanner Kalnow, Andrew F. Little, Andrew G. Lloyd, Christopher M. State Emergency Department Opioid Guidelines: Current Status |
title | State Emergency Department Opioid Guidelines: Current Status |
title_full | State Emergency Department Opioid Guidelines: Current Status |
title_fullStr | State Emergency Department Opioid Guidelines: Current Status |
title_full_unstemmed | State Emergency Department Opioid Guidelines: Current Status |
title_short | State Emergency Department Opioid Guidelines: Current Status |
title_sort | state emergency department opioid guidelines: current status |
topic | Behavioral Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5391881/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28435482 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.12.30854 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT broidaroberti stateemergencydepartmentopioidguidelinescurrentstatus AT gronowskitanner stateemergencydepartmentopioidguidelinescurrentstatus AT kalnowandrewf stateemergencydepartmentopioidguidelinescurrentstatus AT littleandrewg stateemergencydepartmentopioidguidelinescurrentstatus AT lloydchristopherm stateemergencydepartmentopioidguidelinescurrentstatus |