Cargando…

Radiation dose reduction in pediatric great vessel stent computed tomography using iterative reconstruction: A phantom study

BACKGROUND: To study dose reduction using iterative reconstruction (IR) for pediatric great vessel stent computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Five different great vessel stents were separately placed in a gel-containing plastic holder within an anthropomorphic chest phantom. The stent lumen was filled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: den Harder, Annemarie M., Suchá, Dominika, van Doormaal, Pieter J., Budde, Ricardo P. J., de Jong, Pim A., Schilham, Arnold M. R., Breur, Johannes M. P. J., Leiner, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5391930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28410386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175714
_version_ 1783229365009514496
author den Harder, Annemarie M.
Suchá, Dominika
van Doormaal, Pieter J.
Budde, Ricardo P. J.
de Jong, Pim A.
Schilham, Arnold M. R.
Breur, Johannes M. P. J.
Leiner, Tim
author_facet den Harder, Annemarie M.
Suchá, Dominika
van Doormaal, Pieter J.
Budde, Ricardo P. J.
de Jong, Pim A.
Schilham, Arnold M. R.
Breur, Johannes M. P. J.
Leiner, Tim
author_sort den Harder, Annemarie M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To study dose reduction using iterative reconstruction (IR) for pediatric great vessel stent computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Five different great vessel stents were separately placed in a gel-containing plastic holder within an anthropomorphic chest phantom. The stent lumen was filled with diluted contrast gel. CT acquisitions were performed at routine dose, 52% and 81% reduced dose and reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and IR. Objective image quality in terms of noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) as well as subjective image quality were evaluated. RESULTS: Noise, SNR and CNR were improved with IR at routine and 52% reduced dose, compared to FBP at routine dose. The lowest dose level resulted in decreased objective image quality with both FBP and IR. Subjective image quality was excellent at all dose levels. CONCLUSION: IR resulted in improved objective image quality at routine dose and 52% reduced dose, while objective image quality deteriorated at 81% reduced dose. Subjective image quality was not affected by dose reduction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5391930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53919302017-05-03 Radiation dose reduction in pediatric great vessel stent computed tomography using iterative reconstruction: A phantom study den Harder, Annemarie M. Suchá, Dominika van Doormaal, Pieter J. Budde, Ricardo P. J. de Jong, Pim A. Schilham, Arnold M. R. Breur, Johannes M. P. J. Leiner, Tim PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: To study dose reduction using iterative reconstruction (IR) for pediatric great vessel stent computed tomography (CT). METHODS: Five different great vessel stents were separately placed in a gel-containing plastic holder within an anthropomorphic chest phantom. The stent lumen was filled with diluted contrast gel. CT acquisitions were performed at routine dose, 52% and 81% reduced dose and reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and IR. Objective image quality in terms of noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) as well as subjective image quality were evaluated. RESULTS: Noise, SNR and CNR were improved with IR at routine and 52% reduced dose, compared to FBP at routine dose. The lowest dose level resulted in decreased objective image quality with both FBP and IR. Subjective image quality was excellent at all dose levels. CONCLUSION: IR resulted in improved objective image quality at routine dose and 52% reduced dose, while objective image quality deteriorated at 81% reduced dose. Subjective image quality was not affected by dose reduction. Public Library of Science 2017-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5391930/ /pubmed/28410386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175714 Text en © 2017 den Harder et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
den Harder, Annemarie M.
Suchá, Dominika
van Doormaal, Pieter J.
Budde, Ricardo P. J.
de Jong, Pim A.
Schilham, Arnold M. R.
Breur, Johannes M. P. J.
Leiner, Tim
Radiation dose reduction in pediatric great vessel stent computed tomography using iterative reconstruction: A phantom study
title Radiation dose reduction in pediatric great vessel stent computed tomography using iterative reconstruction: A phantom study
title_full Radiation dose reduction in pediatric great vessel stent computed tomography using iterative reconstruction: A phantom study
title_fullStr Radiation dose reduction in pediatric great vessel stent computed tomography using iterative reconstruction: A phantom study
title_full_unstemmed Radiation dose reduction in pediatric great vessel stent computed tomography using iterative reconstruction: A phantom study
title_short Radiation dose reduction in pediatric great vessel stent computed tomography using iterative reconstruction: A phantom study
title_sort radiation dose reduction in pediatric great vessel stent computed tomography using iterative reconstruction: a phantom study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5391930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28410386
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175714
work_keys_str_mv AT denharderannemariem radiationdosereductioninpediatricgreatvesselstentcomputedtomographyusingiterativereconstructionaphantomstudy
AT suchadominika radiationdosereductioninpediatricgreatvesselstentcomputedtomographyusingiterativereconstructionaphantomstudy
AT vandoormaalpieterj radiationdosereductioninpediatricgreatvesselstentcomputedtomographyusingiterativereconstructionaphantomstudy
AT buddericardopj radiationdosereductioninpediatricgreatvesselstentcomputedtomographyusingiterativereconstructionaphantomstudy
AT dejongpima radiationdosereductioninpediatricgreatvesselstentcomputedtomographyusingiterativereconstructionaphantomstudy
AT schilhamarnoldmr radiationdosereductioninpediatricgreatvesselstentcomputedtomographyusingiterativereconstructionaphantomstudy
AT breurjohannesmpj radiationdosereductioninpediatricgreatvesselstentcomputedtomographyusingiterativereconstructionaphantomstudy
AT leinertim radiationdosereductioninpediatricgreatvesselstentcomputedtomographyusingiterativereconstructionaphantomstudy