Cargando…

Neck Muscle EMG-Force Relationship and Its Reliability During Isometric Contractions

BACKGROUND: Susceptible to injury, the neck is subject to scientific investigations, frequently aiming to elucidate possible injury mechanisms via surface electromyography (EMG) by indirectly estimating cervical loads. Accurate estimation requires that the EMG-force relationship is known and that it...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lo Martire, Riccardo, Gladh, Kristofer, Westman, Anton, Äng, Björn O.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5392189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28411326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-017-0083-2
_version_ 1783229396158513152
author Lo Martire, Riccardo
Gladh, Kristofer
Westman, Anton
Äng, Björn O.
author_facet Lo Martire, Riccardo
Gladh, Kristofer
Westman, Anton
Äng, Björn O.
author_sort Lo Martire, Riccardo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Susceptible to injury, the neck is subject to scientific investigations, frequently aiming to elucidate possible injury mechanisms via surface electromyography (EMG) by indirectly estimating cervical loads. Accurate estimation requires that the EMG-force relationship is known and that its measurement error is quantified. Hence, this study examined the relationship between EMG and isometric force amplitude of the anterior neck (AN), the upper posterior neck (UPN), and the lower posterior neck (LPN) and then assessed the relationships’ test-retest reliability across force-percentiles within and between days. METHODS: EMG and force data were sampled from 18 participants conducting randomly ordered muscle contractions at 5–90% of maximal voluntary force during three trials over 2 days. EMG-force relationships were modeled with general linear mixed-effects regression. Overall fitted lines’ between-trial discrepancies were evaluated. Finally, the reliability of participants’ fitted regression lines was quantified by an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the standard error of measurement (SEM). RESULTS: A rectilinear model had the best fit for AN while positively oriented quadratic models had the best fit for UPN and LPN, with mean adjusted conditional coefficients of determination and root mean square errors of 0.97–0.98 and 4–5%, respectively. Overall EMG-force relationships displayed a maximum 6% between-trial discrepancy and over 20% of maximal force, and mean ICC was above 0.79 within day and 0.27–0.61 between days across areas. Corresponding SEM was below 12% both within and between days across areas, excluding UPN between days, for which SEM was higher. CONCLUSIONS: EMG-force relationships were elucidated for three neck areas, and provided models allow inferences to be drawn from EMG to force on a group level. Reliability of EMG-force relationship models was higher within than between days, but typically acceptable for all but the lowest contraction intensities, and enables adjustment for measurement imprecision in future studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5392189
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53921892017-05-01 Neck Muscle EMG-Force Relationship and Its Reliability During Isometric Contractions Lo Martire, Riccardo Gladh, Kristofer Westman, Anton Äng, Björn O. Sports Med Open Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Susceptible to injury, the neck is subject to scientific investigations, frequently aiming to elucidate possible injury mechanisms via surface electromyography (EMG) by indirectly estimating cervical loads. Accurate estimation requires that the EMG-force relationship is known and that its measurement error is quantified. Hence, this study examined the relationship between EMG and isometric force amplitude of the anterior neck (AN), the upper posterior neck (UPN), and the lower posterior neck (LPN) and then assessed the relationships’ test-retest reliability across force-percentiles within and between days. METHODS: EMG and force data were sampled from 18 participants conducting randomly ordered muscle contractions at 5–90% of maximal voluntary force during three trials over 2 days. EMG-force relationships were modeled with general linear mixed-effects regression. Overall fitted lines’ between-trial discrepancies were evaluated. Finally, the reliability of participants’ fitted regression lines was quantified by an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the standard error of measurement (SEM). RESULTS: A rectilinear model had the best fit for AN while positively oriented quadratic models had the best fit for UPN and LPN, with mean adjusted conditional coefficients of determination and root mean square errors of 0.97–0.98 and 4–5%, respectively. Overall EMG-force relationships displayed a maximum 6% between-trial discrepancy and over 20% of maximal force, and mean ICC was above 0.79 within day and 0.27–0.61 between days across areas. Corresponding SEM was below 12% both within and between days across areas, excluding UPN between days, for which SEM was higher. CONCLUSIONS: EMG-force relationships were elucidated for three neck areas, and provided models allow inferences to be drawn from EMG to force on a group level. Reliability of EMG-force relationship models was higher within than between days, but typically acceptable for all but the lowest contraction intensities, and enables adjustment for measurement imprecision in future studies. Springer International Publishing 2017-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5392189/ /pubmed/28411326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-017-0083-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Lo Martire, Riccardo
Gladh, Kristofer
Westman, Anton
Äng, Björn O.
Neck Muscle EMG-Force Relationship and Its Reliability During Isometric Contractions
title Neck Muscle EMG-Force Relationship and Its Reliability During Isometric Contractions
title_full Neck Muscle EMG-Force Relationship and Its Reliability During Isometric Contractions
title_fullStr Neck Muscle EMG-Force Relationship and Its Reliability During Isometric Contractions
title_full_unstemmed Neck Muscle EMG-Force Relationship and Its Reliability During Isometric Contractions
title_short Neck Muscle EMG-Force Relationship and Its Reliability During Isometric Contractions
title_sort neck muscle emg-force relationship and its reliability during isometric contractions
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5392189/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28411326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-017-0083-2
work_keys_str_mv AT lomartirericcardo neckmuscleemgforcerelationshipanditsreliabilityduringisometriccontractions
AT gladhkristofer neckmuscleemgforcerelationshipanditsreliabilityduringisometriccontractions
AT westmananton neckmuscleemgforcerelationshipanditsreliabilityduringisometriccontractions
AT angbjorno neckmuscleemgforcerelationshipanditsreliabilityduringisometriccontractions