Cargando…
Metabolic scaling: consensus or controversy?
BACKGROUND: The relationship between body mass (M) and standard metabolic rate (B) among living organisms remains controversial, though it is widely accepted that in many cases B is approximately proportional to the three-quarters power of M. RESULTS: The biological significance of the straight-line...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC539293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15546492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-1-13 |
_version_ | 1782122079272828928 |
---|---|
author | Agutter, Paul S Wheatley, Denys N |
author_facet | Agutter, Paul S Wheatley, Denys N |
author_sort | Agutter, Paul S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The relationship between body mass (M) and standard metabolic rate (B) among living organisms remains controversial, though it is widely accepted that in many cases B is approximately proportional to the three-quarters power of M. RESULTS: The biological significance of the straight-line plots obtained over wide ranges of species when B is plotted against log M remains a matter of debate. In this article we review the values ascribed to the gradients of such graphs (typically 0.75, according to the majority view), and we assess various attempts to explain the allometric power-law phenomenon, placing emphasis on the most recent publications. CONCLUSION: Although many of the models that have been advanced have significant attractions, none can be accepted without serious reservations, and the possibility that no one model can fit all cases has to be more seriously entertained. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-539293 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-5392932004-12-26 Metabolic scaling: consensus or controversy? Agutter, Paul S Wheatley, Denys N Theor Biol Med Model Review BACKGROUND: The relationship between body mass (M) and standard metabolic rate (B) among living organisms remains controversial, though it is widely accepted that in many cases B is approximately proportional to the three-quarters power of M. RESULTS: The biological significance of the straight-line plots obtained over wide ranges of species when B is plotted against log M remains a matter of debate. In this article we review the values ascribed to the gradients of such graphs (typically 0.75, according to the majority view), and we assess various attempts to explain the allometric power-law phenomenon, placing emphasis on the most recent publications. CONCLUSION: Although many of the models that have been advanced have significant attractions, none can be accepted without serious reservations, and the possibility that no one model can fit all cases has to be more seriously entertained. BioMed Central 2004-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC539293/ /pubmed/15546492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-1-13 Text en Copyright © 2004 Agutter and Wheatley; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Agutter, Paul S Wheatley, Denys N Metabolic scaling: consensus or controversy? |
title | Metabolic scaling: consensus or controversy? |
title_full | Metabolic scaling: consensus or controversy? |
title_fullStr | Metabolic scaling: consensus or controversy? |
title_full_unstemmed | Metabolic scaling: consensus or controversy? |
title_short | Metabolic scaling: consensus or controversy? |
title_sort | metabolic scaling: consensus or controversy? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC539293/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15546492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1742-4682-1-13 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT agutterpauls metabolicscalingconsensusorcontroversy AT wheatleydenysn metabolicscalingconsensusorcontroversy |