Cargando…
Evaluation of genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 line probe assay for the detection of MDR-TB in smear positive and negative sputum samples
BACKGROUND: Multi drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) poses formidable challenges to TB control due to its complex diagnostic and treatment challenges and often associated with a high rate of mortality. Accurate and rapid detection of MDR-TB is critical for timely initiation of treatment. Line Prob...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5392973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28415989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2389-6 |
_version_ | 1783229504384139264 |
---|---|
author | Meaza, Abyot Kebede, Abebaw Yaregal, Zelalem Dagne, Zekarias Moga, Shewki Yenew, Bazezew Diriba, Getu Molalign, Helina Tadesse, Mengistu Adisse, Desalegn Getahun, Muluwork Desta, Kassu |
author_facet | Meaza, Abyot Kebede, Abebaw Yaregal, Zelalem Dagne, Zekarias Moga, Shewki Yenew, Bazezew Diriba, Getu Molalign, Helina Tadesse, Mengistu Adisse, Desalegn Getahun, Muluwork Desta, Kassu |
author_sort | Meaza, Abyot |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Multi drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) poses formidable challenges to TB control due to its complex diagnostic and treatment challenges and often associated with a high rate of mortality. Accurate and rapid detection of MDR-TB is critical for timely initiation of treatment. Line Probe Assay (LPA) is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic test based on DNA-STRIP technology for the identification of the M. tuberculosis complex and its resistance to rifampicin (RMP) and/or isoniazid (INH). Hain Lifescience, GmbH, Germany has improved the sensitivity of Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 LPA for the detection of MDR-TB; with the possibility of applying the tool in smear negative sputum samples. METHOD: A cross sectional study was conducted on 274 presumptive MDR-TB patients referred to the National TB Reference Laboratory (NTRL), Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) who submitted sputum samples for laboratory diagnosis of drug resistant-TB testing. Seventy-two smear and culture positive samples processed in smear positive direct LPA category and 197 smear negative sputum samples were processed for direct LPA. Among the smear negative samples 145 (73.6%) were culture negative and 26 (13.2%) were culture positive. All specimens were processed using NALC-NaOH method and ZN smear microscopy done from sediments. Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 done from processed sputum sediments and the result was compared against the reference, BACTEC MGIT 960 culture and DST. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 assay was determined and P-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 LPA were 96.4, 100, 100 and 96.9%, respectively for the detection of MDR-TB from direct smear positive sputum samples. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of Genotype MTBDR plus VER 2.0 LPA were 77.8, 97.2, 82.4 and 97.2%, respectively, for the detection of M. tuberculosis from direct smear negative sputum samples. Fourteen (53.8%) samples had valid results with LPA among the 26 smear negative culture positive samples. The remaining 8 (30.8%) and 4 (15.4%) were invalid and negative with LPA, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 LPA were 100% for the detection of MDR-TB among 14 direct smear negative and culture positive sputum samples. The most common mutations associated with RMP and INH resistance were S531L and S315TL, respectively. A single rare mutation (C15T/A16G) was detected for INH resistance. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 LPA in direct smear positive sputum sample was highly sensitive and specific for early detection of MDR-TB. However, the diagnostic performance of this molecular assay in direct smear negative sputum sample was low and showed a high level of invalid results for detection of M. tuberculosis and its resistance to RMP and/or INH so it is unlikely to implement Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 for the detection of MDR-TB in direct smear negative sample in our routine settings. The sensitivity of the assay should be improved for detection of MDR-TB in direct smear negative sputum specimens. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5392973 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53929732017-04-20 Evaluation of genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 line probe assay for the detection of MDR-TB in smear positive and negative sputum samples Meaza, Abyot Kebede, Abebaw Yaregal, Zelalem Dagne, Zekarias Moga, Shewki Yenew, Bazezew Diriba, Getu Molalign, Helina Tadesse, Mengistu Adisse, Desalegn Getahun, Muluwork Desta, Kassu BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Multi drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) poses formidable challenges to TB control due to its complex diagnostic and treatment challenges and often associated with a high rate of mortality. Accurate and rapid detection of MDR-TB is critical for timely initiation of treatment. Line Probe Assay (LPA) is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic test based on DNA-STRIP technology for the identification of the M. tuberculosis complex and its resistance to rifampicin (RMP) and/or isoniazid (INH). Hain Lifescience, GmbH, Germany has improved the sensitivity of Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 LPA for the detection of MDR-TB; with the possibility of applying the tool in smear negative sputum samples. METHOD: A cross sectional study was conducted on 274 presumptive MDR-TB patients referred to the National TB Reference Laboratory (NTRL), Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) who submitted sputum samples for laboratory diagnosis of drug resistant-TB testing. Seventy-two smear and culture positive samples processed in smear positive direct LPA category and 197 smear negative sputum samples were processed for direct LPA. Among the smear negative samples 145 (73.6%) were culture negative and 26 (13.2%) were culture positive. All specimens were processed using NALC-NaOH method and ZN smear microscopy done from sediments. Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 done from processed sputum sediments and the result was compared against the reference, BACTEC MGIT 960 culture and DST. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 assay was determined and P-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 LPA were 96.4, 100, 100 and 96.9%, respectively for the detection of MDR-TB from direct smear positive sputum samples. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of Genotype MTBDR plus VER 2.0 LPA were 77.8, 97.2, 82.4 and 97.2%, respectively, for the detection of M. tuberculosis from direct smear negative sputum samples. Fourteen (53.8%) samples had valid results with LPA among the 26 smear negative culture positive samples. The remaining 8 (30.8%) and 4 (15.4%) were invalid and negative with LPA, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 LPA were 100% for the detection of MDR-TB among 14 direct smear negative and culture positive sputum samples. The most common mutations associated with RMP and INH resistance were S531L and S315TL, respectively. A single rare mutation (C15T/A16G) was detected for INH resistance. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 LPA in direct smear positive sputum sample was highly sensitive and specific for early detection of MDR-TB. However, the diagnostic performance of this molecular assay in direct smear negative sputum sample was low and showed a high level of invalid results for detection of M. tuberculosis and its resistance to RMP and/or INH so it is unlikely to implement Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 for the detection of MDR-TB in direct smear negative sample in our routine settings. The sensitivity of the assay should be improved for detection of MDR-TB in direct smear negative sputum specimens. BioMed Central 2017-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5392973/ /pubmed/28415989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2389-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Meaza, Abyot Kebede, Abebaw Yaregal, Zelalem Dagne, Zekarias Moga, Shewki Yenew, Bazezew Diriba, Getu Molalign, Helina Tadesse, Mengistu Adisse, Desalegn Getahun, Muluwork Desta, Kassu Evaluation of genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 line probe assay for the detection of MDR-TB in smear positive and negative sputum samples |
title | Evaluation of genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 line probe assay for the detection of MDR-TB in smear positive and negative sputum samples |
title_full | Evaluation of genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 line probe assay for the detection of MDR-TB in smear positive and negative sputum samples |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 line probe assay for the detection of MDR-TB in smear positive and negative sputum samples |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 line probe assay for the detection of MDR-TB in smear positive and negative sputum samples |
title_short | Evaluation of genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 line probe assay for the detection of MDR-TB in smear positive and negative sputum samples |
title_sort | evaluation of genotype mtbdrplus ver 2.0 line probe assay for the detection of mdr-tb in smear positive and negative sputum samples |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5392973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28415989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2389-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT meazaabyot evaluationofgenotypemtbdrplusver20lineprobeassayforthedetectionofmdrtbinsmearpositiveandnegativesputumsamples AT kebedeabebaw evaluationofgenotypemtbdrplusver20lineprobeassayforthedetectionofmdrtbinsmearpositiveandnegativesputumsamples AT yaregalzelalem evaluationofgenotypemtbdrplusver20lineprobeassayforthedetectionofmdrtbinsmearpositiveandnegativesputumsamples AT dagnezekarias evaluationofgenotypemtbdrplusver20lineprobeassayforthedetectionofmdrtbinsmearpositiveandnegativesputumsamples AT mogashewki evaluationofgenotypemtbdrplusver20lineprobeassayforthedetectionofmdrtbinsmearpositiveandnegativesputumsamples AT yenewbazezew evaluationofgenotypemtbdrplusver20lineprobeassayforthedetectionofmdrtbinsmearpositiveandnegativesputumsamples AT diribagetu evaluationofgenotypemtbdrplusver20lineprobeassayforthedetectionofmdrtbinsmearpositiveandnegativesputumsamples AT molalignhelina evaluationofgenotypemtbdrplusver20lineprobeassayforthedetectionofmdrtbinsmearpositiveandnegativesputumsamples AT tadessemengistu evaluationofgenotypemtbdrplusver20lineprobeassayforthedetectionofmdrtbinsmearpositiveandnegativesputumsamples AT adissedesalegn evaluationofgenotypemtbdrplusver20lineprobeassayforthedetectionofmdrtbinsmearpositiveandnegativesputumsamples AT getahunmuluwork evaluationofgenotypemtbdrplusver20lineprobeassayforthedetectionofmdrtbinsmearpositiveandnegativesputumsamples AT destakassu evaluationofgenotypemtbdrplusver20lineprobeassayforthedetectionofmdrtbinsmearpositiveandnegativesputumsamples |