Cargando…

Evaluation of genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 line probe assay for the detection of MDR-TB in smear positive and negative sputum samples

BACKGROUND: Multi drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) poses formidable challenges to TB control due to its complex diagnostic and treatment challenges and often associated with a high rate of mortality. Accurate and rapid detection of MDR-TB is critical for timely initiation of treatment. Line Prob...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Meaza, Abyot, Kebede, Abebaw, Yaregal, Zelalem, Dagne, Zekarias, Moga, Shewki, Yenew, Bazezew, Diriba, Getu, Molalign, Helina, Tadesse, Mengistu, Adisse, Desalegn, Getahun, Muluwork, Desta, Kassu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5392973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28415989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2389-6
_version_ 1783229504384139264
author Meaza, Abyot
Kebede, Abebaw
Yaregal, Zelalem
Dagne, Zekarias
Moga, Shewki
Yenew, Bazezew
Diriba, Getu
Molalign, Helina
Tadesse, Mengistu
Adisse, Desalegn
Getahun, Muluwork
Desta, Kassu
author_facet Meaza, Abyot
Kebede, Abebaw
Yaregal, Zelalem
Dagne, Zekarias
Moga, Shewki
Yenew, Bazezew
Diriba, Getu
Molalign, Helina
Tadesse, Mengistu
Adisse, Desalegn
Getahun, Muluwork
Desta, Kassu
author_sort Meaza, Abyot
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multi drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) poses formidable challenges to TB control due to its complex diagnostic and treatment challenges and often associated with a high rate of mortality. Accurate and rapid detection of MDR-TB is critical for timely initiation of treatment. Line Probe Assay (LPA) is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic test based on DNA-STRIP technology for the identification of the M. tuberculosis complex and its resistance to rifampicin (RMP) and/or isoniazid (INH). Hain Lifescience, GmbH, Germany has improved the sensitivity of Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 LPA for the detection of MDR-TB; with the possibility of applying the tool in smear negative sputum samples. METHOD: A cross sectional study was conducted on 274 presumptive MDR-TB patients referred to the National TB Reference Laboratory (NTRL), Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) who submitted sputum samples for laboratory diagnosis of drug resistant-TB testing. Seventy-two smear and culture positive samples processed in smear positive direct LPA category and 197 smear negative sputum samples were processed for direct LPA. Among the smear negative samples 145 (73.6%) were culture negative and 26 (13.2%) were culture positive. All specimens were processed using NALC-NaOH method and ZN smear microscopy done from sediments. Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 done from processed sputum sediments and the result was compared against the reference, BACTEC MGIT 960 culture and DST. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 assay was determined and P-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 LPA were 96.4, 100, 100 and 96.9%, respectively for the detection of MDR-TB from direct smear positive sputum samples. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of Genotype MTBDR plus VER 2.0 LPA were 77.8, 97.2, 82.4 and 97.2%, respectively, for the detection of M. tuberculosis from direct smear negative sputum samples. Fourteen (53.8%) samples had valid results with LPA among the 26 smear negative culture positive samples. The remaining 8 (30.8%) and 4 (15.4%) were invalid and negative with LPA, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 LPA were 100% for the detection of MDR-TB among 14 direct smear negative and culture positive sputum samples. The most common mutations associated with RMP and INH resistance were S531L and S315TL, respectively. A single rare mutation (C15T/A16G) was detected for INH resistance. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 LPA in direct smear positive sputum sample was highly sensitive and specific for early detection of MDR-TB. However, the diagnostic performance of this molecular assay in direct smear negative sputum sample was low and showed a high level of invalid results for detection of M. tuberculosis and its resistance to RMP and/or INH so it is unlikely to implement Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 for the detection of MDR-TB in direct smear negative sample in our routine settings. The sensitivity of the assay should be improved for detection of MDR-TB in direct smear negative sputum specimens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5392973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53929732017-04-20 Evaluation of genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 line probe assay for the detection of MDR-TB in smear positive and negative sputum samples Meaza, Abyot Kebede, Abebaw Yaregal, Zelalem Dagne, Zekarias Moga, Shewki Yenew, Bazezew Diriba, Getu Molalign, Helina Tadesse, Mengistu Adisse, Desalegn Getahun, Muluwork Desta, Kassu BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Multi drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) poses formidable challenges to TB control due to its complex diagnostic and treatment challenges and often associated with a high rate of mortality. Accurate and rapid detection of MDR-TB is critical for timely initiation of treatment. Line Probe Assay (LPA) is a qualitative in vitro diagnostic test based on DNA-STRIP technology for the identification of the M. tuberculosis complex and its resistance to rifampicin (RMP) and/or isoniazid (INH). Hain Lifescience, GmbH, Germany has improved the sensitivity of Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 LPA for the detection of MDR-TB; with the possibility of applying the tool in smear negative sputum samples. METHOD: A cross sectional study was conducted on 274 presumptive MDR-TB patients referred to the National TB Reference Laboratory (NTRL), Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) who submitted sputum samples for laboratory diagnosis of drug resistant-TB testing. Seventy-two smear and culture positive samples processed in smear positive direct LPA category and 197 smear negative sputum samples were processed for direct LPA. Among the smear negative samples 145 (73.6%) were culture negative and 26 (13.2%) were culture positive. All specimens were processed using NALC-NaOH method and ZN smear microscopy done from sediments. Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 done from processed sputum sediments and the result was compared against the reference, BACTEC MGIT 960 culture and DST. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 assay was determined and P-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 LPA were 96.4, 100, 100 and 96.9%, respectively for the detection of MDR-TB from direct smear positive sputum samples. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of Genotype MTBDR plus VER 2.0 LPA were 77.8, 97.2, 82.4 and 97.2%, respectively, for the detection of M. tuberculosis from direct smear negative sputum samples. Fourteen (53.8%) samples had valid results with LPA among the 26 smear negative culture positive samples. The remaining 8 (30.8%) and 4 (15.4%) were invalid and negative with LPA, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 LPA were 100% for the detection of MDR-TB among 14 direct smear negative and culture positive sputum samples. The most common mutations associated with RMP and INH resistance were S531L and S315TL, respectively. A single rare mutation (C15T/A16G) was detected for INH resistance. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 LPA in direct smear positive sputum sample was highly sensitive and specific for early detection of MDR-TB. However, the diagnostic performance of this molecular assay in direct smear negative sputum sample was low and showed a high level of invalid results for detection of M. tuberculosis and its resistance to RMP and/or INH so it is unlikely to implement Genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 for the detection of MDR-TB in direct smear negative sample in our routine settings. The sensitivity of the assay should be improved for detection of MDR-TB in direct smear negative sputum specimens. BioMed Central 2017-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5392973/ /pubmed/28415989 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2389-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Meaza, Abyot
Kebede, Abebaw
Yaregal, Zelalem
Dagne, Zekarias
Moga, Shewki
Yenew, Bazezew
Diriba, Getu
Molalign, Helina
Tadesse, Mengistu
Adisse, Desalegn
Getahun, Muluwork
Desta, Kassu
Evaluation of genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 line probe assay for the detection of MDR-TB in smear positive and negative sputum samples
title Evaluation of genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 line probe assay for the detection of MDR-TB in smear positive and negative sputum samples
title_full Evaluation of genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 line probe assay for the detection of MDR-TB in smear positive and negative sputum samples
title_fullStr Evaluation of genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 line probe assay for the detection of MDR-TB in smear positive and negative sputum samples
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 line probe assay for the detection of MDR-TB in smear positive and negative sputum samples
title_short Evaluation of genotype MTBDRplus VER 2.0 line probe assay for the detection of MDR-TB in smear positive and negative sputum samples
title_sort evaluation of genotype mtbdrplus ver 2.0 line probe assay for the detection of mdr-tb in smear positive and negative sputum samples
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5392973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28415989
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2389-6
work_keys_str_mv AT meazaabyot evaluationofgenotypemtbdrplusver20lineprobeassayforthedetectionofmdrtbinsmearpositiveandnegativesputumsamples
AT kebedeabebaw evaluationofgenotypemtbdrplusver20lineprobeassayforthedetectionofmdrtbinsmearpositiveandnegativesputumsamples
AT yaregalzelalem evaluationofgenotypemtbdrplusver20lineprobeassayforthedetectionofmdrtbinsmearpositiveandnegativesputumsamples
AT dagnezekarias evaluationofgenotypemtbdrplusver20lineprobeassayforthedetectionofmdrtbinsmearpositiveandnegativesputumsamples
AT mogashewki evaluationofgenotypemtbdrplusver20lineprobeassayforthedetectionofmdrtbinsmearpositiveandnegativesputumsamples
AT yenewbazezew evaluationofgenotypemtbdrplusver20lineprobeassayforthedetectionofmdrtbinsmearpositiveandnegativesputumsamples
AT diribagetu evaluationofgenotypemtbdrplusver20lineprobeassayforthedetectionofmdrtbinsmearpositiveandnegativesputumsamples
AT molalignhelina evaluationofgenotypemtbdrplusver20lineprobeassayforthedetectionofmdrtbinsmearpositiveandnegativesputumsamples
AT tadessemengistu evaluationofgenotypemtbdrplusver20lineprobeassayforthedetectionofmdrtbinsmearpositiveandnegativesputumsamples
AT adissedesalegn evaluationofgenotypemtbdrplusver20lineprobeassayforthedetectionofmdrtbinsmearpositiveandnegativesputumsamples
AT getahunmuluwork evaluationofgenotypemtbdrplusver20lineprobeassayforthedetectionofmdrtbinsmearpositiveandnegativesputumsamples
AT destakassu evaluationofgenotypemtbdrplusver20lineprobeassayforthedetectionofmdrtbinsmearpositiveandnegativesputumsamples