Cargando…

Prognostic value of pretreatment standardized uptake value of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET in patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: F-18- fluorodeoxyglucose Positron emission tomography ((18)FDG-PET) has been widely used in clinical practice. However, the prognostic value of the pretreatment standardized uptake value (SUV) for patients with gastric cancer remains controversial. METHODS: Major databases were systemati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Zhonghua, Zhao, Junhua, Gao, Peng, Song, Yongxi, Sun, Jingxu, Chen, Xiaowan, Ma, Bin, Wang, Zhenning
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5392988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28415990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3271-z
_version_ 1783229508324687872
author Wu, Zhonghua
Zhao, Junhua
Gao, Peng
Song, Yongxi
Sun, Jingxu
Chen, Xiaowan
Ma, Bin
Wang, Zhenning
author_facet Wu, Zhonghua
Zhao, Junhua
Gao, Peng
Song, Yongxi
Sun, Jingxu
Chen, Xiaowan
Ma, Bin
Wang, Zhenning
author_sort Wu, Zhonghua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: F-18- fluorodeoxyglucose Positron emission tomography ((18)FDG-PET) has been widely used in clinical practice. However, the prognostic value of the pretreatment standardized uptake value (SUV) for patients with gastric cancer remains controversial. METHODS: Major databases were systematically searched. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale; the PET protocols were also evaluated. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were used to estimate the effect size. Data from the included studies were analyzed using Review Manager Software version 5.2. RESULTS: Eight studies with 1080 patients were included. The pooled HR for OS of six studies including 672 patients was 1.72 (95% CI [1.28–2.3], p = 0.0004, I(2) = 0%), indicating that patients with high SUVs may have poor prognosis. The pooled HR for RFS was 1.70 (95% CI [1.20–2.39], p = 0.003, I(2) = 0%). Subgroup analysis based on the cutoff values determining method indicated that the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) method could better define the cutoff value. Subgroup analysis based on the therapeutic strategies used subsequently indicated the significant prognostic value of SUV. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our meta-analysis indicated that pretreatment SUV in primary lesions can be an important prognostic factor for overall survival and recurrence-free survival in patients with gastric cancer. High SUVs may indicate poor prognosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5392988
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53929882017-04-20 Prognostic value of pretreatment standardized uptake value of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET in patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis Wu, Zhonghua Zhao, Junhua Gao, Peng Song, Yongxi Sun, Jingxu Chen, Xiaowan Ma, Bin Wang, Zhenning BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: F-18- fluorodeoxyglucose Positron emission tomography ((18)FDG-PET) has been widely used in clinical practice. However, the prognostic value of the pretreatment standardized uptake value (SUV) for patients with gastric cancer remains controversial. METHODS: Major databases were systematically searched. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale; the PET protocols were also evaluated. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were used to estimate the effect size. Data from the included studies were analyzed using Review Manager Software version 5.2. RESULTS: Eight studies with 1080 patients were included. The pooled HR for OS of six studies including 672 patients was 1.72 (95% CI [1.28–2.3], p = 0.0004, I(2) = 0%), indicating that patients with high SUVs may have poor prognosis. The pooled HR for RFS was 1.70 (95% CI [1.20–2.39], p = 0.003, I(2) = 0%). Subgroup analysis based on the cutoff values determining method indicated that the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) method could better define the cutoff value. Subgroup analysis based on the therapeutic strategies used subsequently indicated the significant prognostic value of SUV. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our meta-analysis indicated that pretreatment SUV in primary lesions can be an important prognostic factor for overall survival and recurrence-free survival in patients with gastric cancer. High SUVs may indicate poor prognosis. BioMed Central 2017-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5392988/ /pubmed/28415990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3271-z Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wu, Zhonghua
Zhao, Junhua
Gao, Peng
Song, Yongxi
Sun, Jingxu
Chen, Xiaowan
Ma, Bin
Wang, Zhenning
Prognostic value of pretreatment standardized uptake value of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET in patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
title Prognostic value of pretreatment standardized uptake value of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET in patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
title_full Prognostic value of pretreatment standardized uptake value of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET in patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Prognostic value of pretreatment standardized uptake value of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET in patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of pretreatment standardized uptake value of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET in patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
title_short Prognostic value of pretreatment standardized uptake value of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET in patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
title_sort prognostic value of pretreatment standardized uptake value of f-18-fluorodeoxyglucose pet in patients with gastric cancer: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5392988/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28415990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3271-z
work_keys_str_mv AT wuzhonghua prognosticvalueofpretreatmentstandardizeduptakevalueoff18fluorodeoxyglucosepetinpatientswithgastriccancerametaanalysis
AT zhaojunhua prognosticvalueofpretreatmentstandardizeduptakevalueoff18fluorodeoxyglucosepetinpatientswithgastriccancerametaanalysis
AT gaopeng prognosticvalueofpretreatmentstandardizeduptakevalueoff18fluorodeoxyglucosepetinpatientswithgastriccancerametaanalysis
AT songyongxi prognosticvalueofpretreatmentstandardizeduptakevalueoff18fluorodeoxyglucosepetinpatientswithgastriccancerametaanalysis
AT sunjingxu prognosticvalueofpretreatmentstandardizeduptakevalueoff18fluorodeoxyglucosepetinpatientswithgastriccancerametaanalysis
AT chenxiaowan prognosticvalueofpretreatmentstandardizeduptakevalueoff18fluorodeoxyglucosepetinpatientswithgastriccancerametaanalysis
AT mabin prognosticvalueofpretreatmentstandardizeduptakevalueoff18fluorodeoxyglucosepetinpatientswithgastriccancerametaanalysis
AT wangzhenning prognosticvalueofpretreatmentstandardizeduptakevalueoff18fluorodeoxyglucosepetinpatientswithgastriccancerametaanalysis