Cargando…

Management of acute renal colic in the UK: a questionnaire survey

BACKGROUND: There is great variation in the Accident and Emergency workload and location of Urology services in UK hospitals. This study investigated the relationship of the initial management of acute renal colic with the department workload plus local facilities including location of X-ray and uro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lasoye, Tunji A, Sedgwick, Philip M, Patel, Nilay, Skinner, Chas, Nayeem, Nadeem
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC539300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15585056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-4-5
_version_ 1782122080945307648
author Lasoye, Tunji A
Sedgwick, Philip M
Patel, Nilay
Skinner, Chas
Nayeem, Nadeem
author_facet Lasoye, Tunji A
Sedgwick, Philip M
Patel, Nilay
Skinner, Chas
Nayeem, Nadeem
author_sort Lasoye, Tunji A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is great variation in the Accident and Emergency workload and location of Urology services in UK hospitals. This study investigated the relationship of the initial management of acute renal colic with the department workload plus local facilities including location of X-ray and urology services in UK Accident and Emergency (A&E) departments. METHODS: A&E departments in each of the 11 UK Deanery regions were stratified based on departmental workload, namely <30,000 (small); 30,000 to 50,000 (medium); 50,000 to 80,000 (large) and >80,000 (very large) patients per year. One third of departments were selected in each group leading to a sample size of 106. A questionnaire was administered. Associations between categorical variables were investigated using the chi-squared test and when not valid, Fisher's Exact test was employed. Differences between groups in ordinal variables were investigated using the Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: All questionnaires were returned. Twenty-nine units (27.4%) did not perform any radiological investigation on renal colic patients. The number of radiological investigations that were available to departments was associated with workload (P = 0.003); with 57.1% of the small departments performing none and at least 82.8% of units in the other categories performing at least one. Of those departments with X-ray facilities in or adjacent to the department, 63% performed an intravenous urography (IVU) compared to 25% of those departments without (P = 0.026). Of those departments with on-site urology services, 86% performed at least one radiological investigation compared to 52% of units without such services (P = 0.001). Department workload was associated with the first choice analgesia (NSAIDs or parenteral opiates) (P = 0.011). Of the small departments, 64.3% used NSAIDs, 21.4% used parenteral opiates and 14.3% used neither. In comparison, NSAIDS were used by at least 87%, and opiates by at most 12.5% of units in each of the other three categories of department workload. CONCLUSIONS: Over a quarter of UK A&E departments did not perform any radiological investigations and some departments do not even offer renal colic patients any analgesia. Patient management was associated with departmental workload, location of X-ray and Urology services. National guidelines are needed to ensure optimum care for all patients.
format Text
id pubmed-539300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-5393002004-12-26 Management of acute renal colic in the UK: a questionnaire survey Lasoye, Tunji A Sedgwick, Philip M Patel, Nilay Skinner, Chas Nayeem, Nadeem BMC Emerg Med Research Article BACKGROUND: There is great variation in the Accident and Emergency workload and location of Urology services in UK hospitals. This study investigated the relationship of the initial management of acute renal colic with the department workload plus local facilities including location of X-ray and urology services in UK Accident and Emergency (A&E) departments. METHODS: A&E departments in each of the 11 UK Deanery regions were stratified based on departmental workload, namely <30,000 (small); 30,000 to 50,000 (medium); 50,000 to 80,000 (large) and >80,000 (very large) patients per year. One third of departments were selected in each group leading to a sample size of 106. A questionnaire was administered. Associations between categorical variables were investigated using the chi-squared test and when not valid, Fisher's Exact test was employed. Differences between groups in ordinal variables were investigated using the Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: All questionnaires were returned. Twenty-nine units (27.4%) did not perform any radiological investigation on renal colic patients. The number of radiological investigations that were available to departments was associated with workload (P = 0.003); with 57.1% of the small departments performing none and at least 82.8% of units in the other categories performing at least one. Of those departments with X-ray facilities in or adjacent to the department, 63% performed an intravenous urography (IVU) compared to 25% of those departments without (P = 0.026). Of those departments with on-site urology services, 86% performed at least one radiological investigation compared to 52% of units without such services (P = 0.001). Department workload was associated with the first choice analgesia (NSAIDs or parenteral opiates) (P = 0.011). Of the small departments, 64.3% used NSAIDs, 21.4% used parenteral opiates and 14.3% used neither. In comparison, NSAIDS were used by at least 87%, and opiates by at most 12.5% of units in each of the other three categories of department workload. CONCLUSIONS: Over a quarter of UK A&E departments did not perform any radiological investigations and some departments do not even offer renal colic patients any analgesia. Patient management was associated with departmental workload, location of X-ray and Urology services. National guidelines are needed to ensure optimum care for all patients. BioMed Central 2004-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC539300/ /pubmed/15585056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-4-5 Text en Copyright © 2004 Lasoye et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lasoye, Tunji A
Sedgwick, Philip M
Patel, Nilay
Skinner, Chas
Nayeem, Nadeem
Management of acute renal colic in the UK: a questionnaire survey
title Management of acute renal colic in the UK: a questionnaire survey
title_full Management of acute renal colic in the UK: a questionnaire survey
title_fullStr Management of acute renal colic in the UK: a questionnaire survey
title_full_unstemmed Management of acute renal colic in the UK: a questionnaire survey
title_short Management of acute renal colic in the UK: a questionnaire survey
title_sort management of acute renal colic in the uk: a questionnaire survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC539300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15585056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-227X-4-5
work_keys_str_mv AT lasoyetunjia managementofacuterenalcolicintheukaquestionnairesurvey
AT sedgwickphilipm managementofacuterenalcolicintheukaquestionnairesurvey
AT patelnilay managementofacuterenalcolicintheukaquestionnairesurvey
AT skinnerchas managementofacuterenalcolicintheukaquestionnairesurvey
AT nayeemnadeem managementofacuterenalcolicintheukaquestionnairesurvey