Cargando…

Diagnostic validity of the STRATIFY and Downton instruments for evaluating the risk of falls by hospitalised acute-care patients: a multicentre longitudinal study

BACKGROUND: Falls are major adverse events in hospitals. The appropriateness of using risk assessment instruments for falls in hospitals has recently been questioned, although the research performed in this respect presents some methodological shortcomings. The purpose of the present study is to eva...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aranda-Gallardo, Marta, Enriquez de Luna-Rodriguez, Margarita, Vazquez-Blanco, Maria J., Canca-Sanchez, Jose C., Moya-Suarez, Ana B., Morales-Asencio, Jose M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5393002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28412939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2214-3
_version_ 1783229512018821120
author Aranda-Gallardo, Marta
Enriquez de Luna-Rodriguez, Margarita
Vazquez-Blanco, Maria J.
Canca-Sanchez, Jose C.
Moya-Suarez, Ana B.
Morales-Asencio, Jose M.
author_facet Aranda-Gallardo, Marta
Enriquez de Luna-Rodriguez, Margarita
Vazquez-Blanco, Maria J.
Canca-Sanchez, Jose C.
Moya-Suarez, Ana B.
Morales-Asencio, Jose M.
author_sort Aranda-Gallardo, Marta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Falls are major adverse events in hospitals. The appropriateness of using risk assessment instruments for falls in hospitals has recently been questioned, although the research performed in this respect presents some methodological shortcomings. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the accuracy of the Downton and STRATIFY instruments to determine the risk of falls and to predict their incidence in acute care hospitals in the public health system in Andalusia (Spain). METHODS: A longitudinal, multicentre prospective study was made of a cohort of patients recruited between May 2014 and March 2016. The risk of falls was assessed using each of the above instruments during the first 24 h after hospital admittance, with later re-evaluations every 72 h until discharge. Descriptive statistics were obtained, bivariate and multivariate analysis were performed. The diagnostic validity of the process was assessed by calculations of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and ratios of positive and negative likelihood. ROC curve analysis was performed for both instruments. RESULTS: For this study, 1247 patients were recruited, of whom 977 completed all the follow-up assessments. Twenty-three of these patients (2.35%) suffered 24 falls. ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal cut-off point for each assessment instrument was below that described by the authors: AUC STRATIFY = 0.69 (95% CI: 0.57–0.8); AUC Downton = 0.6 (95% CI: 0.48–0.72). With a cut-off point of 1, the sensitivity of STRATIFY was 47.6% and its specificity, 85%. With a cut-off point of 2, Downton presented a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 55.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The Downton and STRATIFY falls risk assessment instruments presented little utility as means of detecting the risk of falls among a sample of adult patients admitted to acute care hospitals. Fall prevention in hospitals should be based on the study of individual risk factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5393002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53930022017-04-20 Diagnostic validity of the STRATIFY and Downton instruments for evaluating the risk of falls by hospitalised acute-care patients: a multicentre longitudinal study Aranda-Gallardo, Marta Enriquez de Luna-Rodriguez, Margarita Vazquez-Blanco, Maria J. Canca-Sanchez, Jose C. Moya-Suarez, Ana B. Morales-Asencio, Jose M. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Falls are major adverse events in hospitals. The appropriateness of using risk assessment instruments for falls in hospitals has recently been questioned, although the research performed in this respect presents some methodological shortcomings. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the accuracy of the Downton and STRATIFY instruments to determine the risk of falls and to predict their incidence in acute care hospitals in the public health system in Andalusia (Spain). METHODS: A longitudinal, multicentre prospective study was made of a cohort of patients recruited between May 2014 and March 2016. The risk of falls was assessed using each of the above instruments during the first 24 h after hospital admittance, with later re-evaluations every 72 h until discharge. Descriptive statistics were obtained, bivariate and multivariate analysis were performed. The diagnostic validity of the process was assessed by calculations of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and ratios of positive and negative likelihood. ROC curve analysis was performed for both instruments. RESULTS: For this study, 1247 patients were recruited, of whom 977 completed all the follow-up assessments. Twenty-three of these patients (2.35%) suffered 24 falls. ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal cut-off point for each assessment instrument was below that described by the authors: AUC STRATIFY = 0.69 (95% CI: 0.57–0.8); AUC Downton = 0.6 (95% CI: 0.48–0.72). With a cut-off point of 1, the sensitivity of STRATIFY was 47.6% and its specificity, 85%. With a cut-off point of 2, Downton presented a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 55.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The Downton and STRATIFY falls risk assessment instruments presented little utility as means of detecting the risk of falls among a sample of adult patients admitted to acute care hospitals. Fall prevention in hospitals should be based on the study of individual risk factors. BioMed Central 2017-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5393002/ /pubmed/28412939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2214-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Aranda-Gallardo, Marta
Enriquez de Luna-Rodriguez, Margarita
Vazquez-Blanco, Maria J.
Canca-Sanchez, Jose C.
Moya-Suarez, Ana B.
Morales-Asencio, Jose M.
Diagnostic validity of the STRATIFY and Downton instruments for evaluating the risk of falls by hospitalised acute-care patients: a multicentre longitudinal study
title Diagnostic validity of the STRATIFY and Downton instruments for evaluating the risk of falls by hospitalised acute-care patients: a multicentre longitudinal study
title_full Diagnostic validity of the STRATIFY and Downton instruments for evaluating the risk of falls by hospitalised acute-care patients: a multicentre longitudinal study
title_fullStr Diagnostic validity of the STRATIFY and Downton instruments for evaluating the risk of falls by hospitalised acute-care patients: a multicentre longitudinal study
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic validity of the STRATIFY and Downton instruments for evaluating the risk of falls by hospitalised acute-care patients: a multicentre longitudinal study
title_short Diagnostic validity of the STRATIFY and Downton instruments for evaluating the risk of falls by hospitalised acute-care patients: a multicentre longitudinal study
title_sort diagnostic validity of the stratify and downton instruments for evaluating the risk of falls by hospitalised acute-care patients: a multicentre longitudinal study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5393002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28412939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2214-3
work_keys_str_mv AT arandagallardomarta diagnosticvalidityofthestratifyanddowntoninstrumentsforevaluatingtheriskoffallsbyhospitalisedacutecarepatientsamulticentrelongitudinalstudy
AT enriquezdelunarodriguezmargarita diagnosticvalidityofthestratifyanddowntoninstrumentsforevaluatingtheriskoffallsbyhospitalisedacutecarepatientsamulticentrelongitudinalstudy
AT vazquezblancomariaj diagnosticvalidityofthestratifyanddowntoninstrumentsforevaluatingtheriskoffallsbyhospitalisedacutecarepatientsamulticentrelongitudinalstudy
AT cancasanchezjosec diagnosticvalidityofthestratifyanddowntoninstrumentsforevaluatingtheriskoffallsbyhospitalisedacutecarepatientsamulticentrelongitudinalstudy
AT moyasuarezanab diagnosticvalidityofthestratifyanddowntoninstrumentsforevaluatingtheriskoffallsbyhospitalisedacutecarepatientsamulticentrelongitudinalstudy
AT moralesasenciojosem diagnosticvalidityofthestratifyanddowntoninstrumentsforevaluatingtheriskoffallsbyhospitalisedacutecarepatientsamulticentrelongitudinalstudy