Cargando…
Diagnostic validity of the STRATIFY and Downton instruments for evaluating the risk of falls by hospitalised acute-care patients: a multicentre longitudinal study
BACKGROUND: Falls are major adverse events in hospitals. The appropriateness of using risk assessment instruments for falls in hospitals has recently been questioned, although the research performed in this respect presents some methodological shortcomings. The purpose of the present study is to eva...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5393002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28412939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2214-3 |
_version_ | 1783229512018821120 |
---|---|
author | Aranda-Gallardo, Marta Enriquez de Luna-Rodriguez, Margarita Vazquez-Blanco, Maria J. Canca-Sanchez, Jose C. Moya-Suarez, Ana B. Morales-Asencio, Jose M. |
author_facet | Aranda-Gallardo, Marta Enriquez de Luna-Rodriguez, Margarita Vazquez-Blanco, Maria J. Canca-Sanchez, Jose C. Moya-Suarez, Ana B. Morales-Asencio, Jose M. |
author_sort | Aranda-Gallardo, Marta |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Falls are major adverse events in hospitals. The appropriateness of using risk assessment instruments for falls in hospitals has recently been questioned, although the research performed in this respect presents some methodological shortcomings. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the accuracy of the Downton and STRATIFY instruments to determine the risk of falls and to predict their incidence in acute care hospitals in the public health system in Andalusia (Spain). METHODS: A longitudinal, multicentre prospective study was made of a cohort of patients recruited between May 2014 and March 2016. The risk of falls was assessed using each of the above instruments during the first 24 h after hospital admittance, with later re-evaluations every 72 h until discharge. Descriptive statistics were obtained, bivariate and multivariate analysis were performed. The diagnostic validity of the process was assessed by calculations of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and ratios of positive and negative likelihood. ROC curve analysis was performed for both instruments. RESULTS: For this study, 1247 patients were recruited, of whom 977 completed all the follow-up assessments. Twenty-three of these patients (2.35%) suffered 24 falls. ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal cut-off point for each assessment instrument was below that described by the authors: AUC STRATIFY = 0.69 (95% CI: 0.57–0.8); AUC Downton = 0.6 (95% CI: 0.48–0.72). With a cut-off point of 1, the sensitivity of STRATIFY was 47.6% and its specificity, 85%. With a cut-off point of 2, Downton presented a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 55.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The Downton and STRATIFY falls risk assessment instruments presented little utility as means of detecting the risk of falls among a sample of adult patients admitted to acute care hospitals. Fall prevention in hospitals should be based on the study of individual risk factors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5393002 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53930022017-04-20 Diagnostic validity of the STRATIFY and Downton instruments for evaluating the risk of falls by hospitalised acute-care patients: a multicentre longitudinal study Aranda-Gallardo, Marta Enriquez de Luna-Rodriguez, Margarita Vazquez-Blanco, Maria J. Canca-Sanchez, Jose C. Moya-Suarez, Ana B. Morales-Asencio, Jose M. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Falls are major adverse events in hospitals. The appropriateness of using risk assessment instruments for falls in hospitals has recently been questioned, although the research performed in this respect presents some methodological shortcomings. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the accuracy of the Downton and STRATIFY instruments to determine the risk of falls and to predict their incidence in acute care hospitals in the public health system in Andalusia (Spain). METHODS: A longitudinal, multicentre prospective study was made of a cohort of patients recruited between May 2014 and March 2016. The risk of falls was assessed using each of the above instruments during the first 24 h after hospital admittance, with later re-evaluations every 72 h until discharge. Descriptive statistics were obtained, bivariate and multivariate analysis were performed. The diagnostic validity of the process was assessed by calculations of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and ratios of positive and negative likelihood. ROC curve analysis was performed for both instruments. RESULTS: For this study, 1247 patients were recruited, of whom 977 completed all the follow-up assessments. Twenty-three of these patients (2.35%) suffered 24 falls. ROC curve analysis showed that the optimal cut-off point for each assessment instrument was below that described by the authors: AUC STRATIFY = 0.69 (95% CI: 0.57–0.8); AUC Downton = 0.6 (95% CI: 0.48–0.72). With a cut-off point of 1, the sensitivity of STRATIFY was 47.6% and its specificity, 85%. With a cut-off point of 2, Downton presented a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 55.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The Downton and STRATIFY falls risk assessment instruments presented little utility as means of detecting the risk of falls among a sample of adult patients admitted to acute care hospitals. Fall prevention in hospitals should be based on the study of individual risk factors. BioMed Central 2017-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5393002/ /pubmed/28412939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2214-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Aranda-Gallardo, Marta Enriquez de Luna-Rodriguez, Margarita Vazquez-Blanco, Maria J. Canca-Sanchez, Jose C. Moya-Suarez, Ana B. Morales-Asencio, Jose M. Diagnostic validity of the STRATIFY and Downton instruments for evaluating the risk of falls by hospitalised acute-care patients: a multicentre longitudinal study |
title | Diagnostic validity of the STRATIFY and Downton instruments for evaluating the risk of falls by hospitalised acute-care patients: a multicentre longitudinal study |
title_full | Diagnostic validity of the STRATIFY and Downton instruments for evaluating the risk of falls by hospitalised acute-care patients: a multicentre longitudinal study |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic validity of the STRATIFY and Downton instruments for evaluating the risk of falls by hospitalised acute-care patients: a multicentre longitudinal study |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic validity of the STRATIFY and Downton instruments for evaluating the risk of falls by hospitalised acute-care patients: a multicentre longitudinal study |
title_short | Diagnostic validity of the STRATIFY and Downton instruments for evaluating the risk of falls by hospitalised acute-care patients: a multicentre longitudinal study |
title_sort | diagnostic validity of the stratify and downton instruments for evaluating the risk of falls by hospitalised acute-care patients: a multicentre longitudinal study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5393002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28412939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2214-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arandagallardomarta diagnosticvalidityofthestratifyanddowntoninstrumentsforevaluatingtheriskoffallsbyhospitalisedacutecarepatientsamulticentrelongitudinalstudy AT enriquezdelunarodriguezmargarita diagnosticvalidityofthestratifyanddowntoninstrumentsforevaluatingtheriskoffallsbyhospitalisedacutecarepatientsamulticentrelongitudinalstudy AT vazquezblancomariaj diagnosticvalidityofthestratifyanddowntoninstrumentsforevaluatingtheriskoffallsbyhospitalisedacutecarepatientsamulticentrelongitudinalstudy AT cancasanchezjosec diagnosticvalidityofthestratifyanddowntoninstrumentsforevaluatingtheriskoffallsbyhospitalisedacutecarepatientsamulticentrelongitudinalstudy AT moyasuarezanab diagnosticvalidityofthestratifyanddowntoninstrumentsforevaluatingtheriskoffallsbyhospitalisedacutecarepatientsamulticentrelongitudinalstudy AT moralesasenciojosem diagnosticvalidityofthestratifyanddowntoninstrumentsforevaluatingtheriskoffallsbyhospitalisedacutecarepatientsamulticentrelongitudinalstudy |