Cargando…

The Clinical Effectiveness of School Screening Programme for Idiopathic Scoliosis in Malaysia

INTRODUCTION: There is no large population size study on school screening for scoliosis in Malaysia. This study is aimed to determine the prevalence rate and positive predictive value (PPV) of screening programme for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 8966 voluntary s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deepak, AS, Ong, JY, Choon, DSK, Lee, CK, Chiu, CK, Chan, CYW, Kwan, MK
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5393113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28435573
http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1703.018
_version_ 1783229539101442048
author Deepak, AS
Ong, JY
Choon, DSK
Lee, CK
Chiu, CK
Chan, CYW
Kwan, MK
author_facet Deepak, AS
Ong, JY
Choon, DSK
Lee, CK
Chiu, CK
Chan, CYW
Kwan, MK
author_sort Deepak, AS
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There is no large population size study on school screening for scoliosis in Malaysia. This study is aimed to determine the prevalence rate and positive predictive value (PPV) of screening programme for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 8966 voluntary school students aged 13-15 years old were recruited for scoliosis screening. Screening was done by measuring the angle of trunk rotation (ATR) on forward bending test (FBT) using a scoliometer. ATR of 5 degrees or more was considered positive. Positively screened students had standard radiographs done for measurement of the Cobb angle. Cobb angle of >10° was used to diagnose scoliosis. The percentage of radiological assessment referral, prevalence rate and PPV of scoliosis were then calculated. RESULTS: Percentage of radiological assessment referral (ATR >5°) was 4.2% (182/4381) for male and 5.0% (228/4585) for female. Only 38.0% of those with ATR >5° presented for further radiological assessment. The adjusted prevalence rate was 2.55% for Cobb angle >10°, 0.59% for >20° and 0.12% for >40°. The PPV is 55.8% for Cobb angle >10°, 12.8% for >20° and 2.6% for > 40°. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study of school scoliosis screening in Malaysia. The prevalence rate of scoliosis was 2.55%. The positive predictive value was 55.8%, which is adequate to suggest that the school scoliosis screening programme did play a role in early detection of scoliosis. However, a cost effectiveness analysis will be needed to firmly determine its efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5393113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Malaysian Orthopaedic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53931132017-04-23 The Clinical Effectiveness of School Screening Programme for Idiopathic Scoliosis in Malaysia Deepak, AS Ong, JY Choon, DSK Lee, CK Chiu, CK Chan, CYW Kwan, MK Malays Orthop J Original Article INTRODUCTION: There is no large population size study on school screening for scoliosis in Malaysia. This study is aimed to determine the prevalence rate and positive predictive value (PPV) of screening programme for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 8966 voluntary school students aged 13-15 years old were recruited for scoliosis screening. Screening was done by measuring the angle of trunk rotation (ATR) on forward bending test (FBT) using a scoliometer. ATR of 5 degrees or more was considered positive. Positively screened students had standard radiographs done for measurement of the Cobb angle. Cobb angle of >10° was used to diagnose scoliosis. The percentage of radiological assessment referral, prevalence rate and PPV of scoliosis were then calculated. RESULTS: Percentage of radiological assessment referral (ATR >5°) was 4.2% (182/4381) for male and 5.0% (228/4585) for female. Only 38.0% of those with ATR >5° presented for further radiological assessment. The adjusted prevalence rate was 2.55% for Cobb angle >10°, 0.59% for >20° and 0.12% for >40°. The PPV is 55.8% for Cobb angle >10°, 12.8% for >20° and 2.6% for > 40°. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study of school scoliosis screening in Malaysia. The prevalence rate of scoliosis was 2.55%. The positive predictive value was 55.8%, which is adequate to suggest that the school scoliosis screening programme did play a role in early detection of scoliosis. However, a cost effectiveness analysis will be needed to firmly determine its efficacy. Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2017-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5393113/ /pubmed/28435573 http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1703.018 Text en © 2017 Malaysian Orthopaedic Association (MOA). All Rights Reserved http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
spellingShingle Original Article
Deepak, AS
Ong, JY
Choon, DSK
Lee, CK
Chiu, CK
Chan, CYW
Kwan, MK
The Clinical Effectiveness of School Screening Programme for Idiopathic Scoliosis in Malaysia
title The Clinical Effectiveness of School Screening Programme for Idiopathic Scoliosis in Malaysia
title_full The Clinical Effectiveness of School Screening Programme for Idiopathic Scoliosis in Malaysia
title_fullStr The Clinical Effectiveness of School Screening Programme for Idiopathic Scoliosis in Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed The Clinical Effectiveness of School Screening Programme for Idiopathic Scoliosis in Malaysia
title_short The Clinical Effectiveness of School Screening Programme for Idiopathic Scoliosis in Malaysia
title_sort clinical effectiveness of school screening programme for idiopathic scoliosis in malaysia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5393113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28435573
http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1703.018
work_keys_str_mv AT deepakas theclinicaleffectivenessofschoolscreeningprogrammeforidiopathicscoliosisinmalaysia
AT ongjy theclinicaleffectivenessofschoolscreeningprogrammeforidiopathicscoliosisinmalaysia
AT choondsk theclinicaleffectivenessofschoolscreeningprogrammeforidiopathicscoliosisinmalaysia
AT leeck theclinicaleffectivenessofschoolscreeningprogrammeforidiopathicscoliosisinmalaysia
AT chiuck theclinicaleffectivenessofschoolscreeningprogrammeforidiopathicscoliosisinmalaysia
AT chancyw theclinicaleffectivenessofschoolscreeningprogrammeforidiopathicscoliosisinmalaysia
AT kwanmk theclinicaleffectivenessofschoolscreeningprogrammeforidiopathicscoliosisinmalaysia
AT deepakas clinicaleffectivenessofschoolscreeningprogrammeforidiopathicscoliosisinmalaysia
AT ongjy clinicaleffectivenessofschoolscreeningprogrammeforidiopathicscoliosisinmalaysia
AT choondsk clinicaleffectivenessofschoolscreeningprogrammeforidiopathicscoliosisinmalaysia
AT leeck clinicaleffectivenessofschoolscreeningprogrammeforidiopathicscoliosisinmalaysia
AT chiuck clinicaleffectivenessofschoolscreeningprogrammeforidiopathicscoliosisinmalaysia
AT chancyw clinicaleffectivenessofschoolscreeningprogrammeforidiopathicscoliosisinmalaysia
AT kwanmk clinicaleffectivenessofschoolscreeningprogrammeforidiopathicscoliosisinmalaysia