Cargando…
The Use of Passive Straight Leg Raising Test: A Survey of Clinicians
Introduction: Passive Straight Leg Raising Test (PSLRT) is one of the most commonly performed test in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to survey the practice and interpretation of PSLRT amongst clinicians working in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: A 15 item questionnaire survey wa...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Malaysian Orthopaedic Association
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5393134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28611909 http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1511.012 |
_version_ | 1783229544583397376 |
---|---|
author | Pande, K |
author_facet | Pande, K |
author_sort | Pande, K |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Passive Straight Leg Raising Test (PSLRT) is one of the most commonly performed test in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to survey the practice and interpretation of PSLRT amongst clinicians working in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: A 15 item questionnaire survey was developed covering various aspects of PSLRT. Orthopaedic surgeons(n=15), neurosurgeons (n=7) and physiotherapists (n=9)were identified as clinicians performing this test regularly and were approached to take part in the survey. Results: The PSLRT was used in all cases of back and leg pain by 68% and correctly performed by 30/31. There was a wide variation in the angle at which it was considered positive (median 45 degrees; range 10-90 degrees). Only 7/31 correctly recognised reproduction of leg pain as indicative of a positive PSLRT. The sitting /distraction SLRT andwell leg / cross SLRT was performed only by 3/31 and 16/31 of clinicians respectively. 90% felt that a positive PSLRT suggested nerve root irritation and 57% thought it was due to stretch of dura and / or nerve root. 23/31 clinicians felt that PSLRT was useful or very useful and 90% reported that result of PSLRT would affect the way they treat a patient. Conclusions: PSLRT is widely used, correctly performed and felt to be useful in practice. But the interpretation of a positive test, understanding of its mechanism and useof variations is poor. There is a need to improve the interpretation and understanding of PSLRT amongst its users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5393134 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Malaysian Orthopaedic Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53931342017-06-13 The Use of Passive Straight Leg Raising Test: A Survey of Clinicians Pande, K Malays Orthop J Original Article Introduction: Passive Straight Leg Raising Test (PSLRT) is one of the most commonly performed test in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to survey the practice and interpretation of PSLRT amongst clinicians working in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: A 15 item questionnaire survey was developed covering various aspects of PSLRT. Orthopaedic surgeons(n=15), neurosurgeons (n=7) and physiotherapists (n=9)were identified as clinicians performing this test regularly and were approached to take part in the survey. Results: The PSLRT was used in all cases of back and leg pain by 68% and correctly performed by 30/31. There was a wide variation in the angle at which it was considered positive (median 45 degrees; range 10-90 degrees). Only 7/31 correctly recognised reproduction of leg pain as indicative of a positive PSLRT. The sitting /distraction SLRT andwell leg / cross SLRT was performed only by 3/31 and 16/31 of clinicians respectively. 90% felt that a positive PSLRT suggested nerve root irritation and 57% thought it was due to stretch of dura and / or nerve root. 23/31 clinicians felt that PSLRT was useful or very useful and 90% reported that result of PSLRT would affect the way they treat a patient. Conclusions: PSLRT is widely used, correctly performed and felt to be useful in practice. But the interpretation of a positive test, understanding of its mechanism and useof variations is poor. There is a need to improve the interpretation and understanding of PSLRT amongst its users. Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2015-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5393134/ /pubmed/28611909 http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1511.012 Text en © 2015 Malaysian Orthopaedic Association (MOA). All Rights Reserved http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Pande, K The Use of Passive Straight Leg Raising Test: A Survey of Clinicians |
title | The Use of Passive Straight Leg Raising Test: A Survey of Clinicians |
title_full | The Use of Passive Straight Leg Raising Test: A Survey of Clinicians |
title_fullStr | The Use of Passive Straight Leg Raising Test: A Survey of Clinicians |
title_full_unstemmed | The Use of Passive Straight Leg Raising Test: A Survey of Clinicians |
title_short | The Use of Passive Straight Leg Raising Test: A Survey of Clinicians |
title_sort | use of passive straight leg raising test: a survey of clinicians |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5393134/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28611909 http://dx.doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.1511.012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pandek theuseofpassivestraightlegraisingtestasurveyofclinicians AT pandek useofpassivestraightlegraisingtestasurveyofclinicians |