Cargando…

Distinct Visual Thresholds for Egocentric and Allocentric Information Pick UP?

Unlike perceptual size judgments, actions—but not delayed actions—performed under full vision are relatively unaffected by the Müller-Lyer illusion. Controversy remains as to the source of these effects. We aimed to illuminate the problem by exploiting the possibility that vision for action and perc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Wit, Matthieu, Van Der Kamp, John, Masters, Rich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5393715/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/ic214
_version_ 1783229610347986944
author De Wit, Matthieu
Van Der Kamp, John
Masters, Rich
author_facet De Wit, Matthieu
Van Der Kamp, John
Masters, Rich
author_sort De Wit, Matthieu
collection PubMed
description Unlike perceptual size judgments, actions—but not delayed actions—performed under full vision are relatively unaffected by the Müller-Lyer illusion. Controversy remains as to the source of these effects. We aimed to illuminate the problem by exploiting the possibility that vision for action and perception may have distinct thresholds. In Experiment 1 participants performed delayed pointing movements towards briefly presented (12 ms–masked) M-L targets of different sizes. While participants were unable to perceptually discriminate between targets, their movements were nevertheless a function of target size, but not of the illusion (de Wit, van der Kamp, & Masters, in press). This implies 1) that vision for action is functional even after a delay and/or 2) that distinct thresholds exists for egocentric and allocentric information pick up, possibly irrespective of whether a task is perceptual or motoric in nature. Experiment 2, in which participants manually matched the size of perceptually indiscriminable M-L targets, supports the latter option. These findings are reviewed in relation to recent discussions of the two-visual-systems model. de Wit, M.M., van der Kamp, J., & Masters, R.S.W. (in press). Delayed pointing movements to masked Müller-Lyer figures are affected by target size but not the illusion. Neuropsychologia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5393715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53937152017-04-24 Distinct Visual Thresholds for Egocentric and Allocentric Information Pick UP? De Wit, Matthieu Van Der Kamp, John Masters, Rich Iperception Article Unlike perceptual size judgments, actions—but not delayed actions—performed under full vision are relatively unaffected by the Müller-Lyer illusion. Controversy remains as to the source of these effects. We aimed to illuminate the problem by exploiting the possibility that vision for action and perception may have distinct thresholds. In Experiment 1 participants performed delayed pointing movements towards briefly presented (12 ms–masked) M-L targets of different sizes. While participants were unable to perceptually discriminate between targets, their movements were nevertheless a function of target size, but not of the illusion (de Wit, van der Kamp, & Masters, in press). This implies 1) that vision for action is functional even after a delay and/or 2) that distinct thresholds exists for egocentric and allocentric information pick up, possibly irrespective of whether a task is perceptual or motoric in nature. Experiment 2, in which participants manually matched the size of perceptually indiscriminable M-L targets, supports the latter option. These findings are reviewed in relation to recent discussions of the two-visual-systems model. de Wit, M.M., van der Kamp, J., & Masters, R.S.W. (in press). Delayed pointing movements to masked Müller-Lyer figures are affected by target size but not the illusion. Neuropsychologia. SAGE Publications 2011-05-01 2011-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5393715/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/ic214 Text en © 2011 SAGE Publications Ltd. Manuscript content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Licenses http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm).
spellingShingle Article
De Wit, Matthieu
Van Der Kamp, John
Masters, Rich
Distinct Visual Thresholds for Egocentric and Allocentric Information Pick UP?
title Distinct Visual Thresholds for Egocentric and Allocentric Information Pick UP?
title_full Distinct Visual Thresholds for Egocentric and Allocentric Information Pick UP?
title_fullStr Distinct Visual Thresholds for Egocentric and Allocentric Information Pick UP?
title_full_unstemmed Distinct Visual Thresholds for Egocentric and Allocentric Information Pick UP?
title_short Distinct Visual Thresholds for Egocentric and Allocentric Information Pick UP?
title_sort distinct visual thresholds for egocentric and allocentric information pick up?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5393715/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/ic214
work_keys_str_mv AT dewitmatthieu distinctvisualthresholdsforegocentricandallocentricinformationpickup
AT vanderkampjohn distinctvisualthresholdsforegocentricandallocentricinformationpickup
AT mastersrich distinctvisualthresholdsforegocentricandallocentricinformationpickup