Cargando…

Comparison of Single and Dual Target Visual Attention Tasks in Children with down Syndrome

Understanding the nature of attentional processing in children with Down Syndrome (DS) is imperative for developing effective education practices. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether children with DS exhibit impairment in sustained, transient, single-, or dual-target continuous p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murphy, Melanie J., Goharpey, Nahal, Hook, Bodil, Crewther, David P., Crewther, Sheila G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5393858/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/ic328
Descripción
Sumario:Understanding the nature of attentional processing in children with Down Syndrome (DS) is imperative for developing effective education practices. The aim of the current study was to investigate whether children with DS exhibit impairment in sustained, transient, single-, or dual-target continuous performance tasks. Target detection time and accuracy was compared in children with DS to Typically Developing (TD) children of similar nonverbal mental age (as measured by the Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices), on single and dual- target continuous performance tasks measuring sustained attention, a visual change detection task measuring transient attention, and feature and conjunctive visual search tasks measuring both sustained and transient attention. Results showed that children with DS performed similarly to TD children on sustained and transient attention tasks that only required the detection of a single unique target, but were impaired in overall accuracy on tasks that required dual-target detection. Findings suggest a possible impairment in attention and working memory in children with DS. Error analysis of task responses revealed differences in problem solving strategy between children with DS and TD children, despite similar overall performance. Findings have implications for the education of children with DS and understanding of the nature of intellectual disability per se.