Cargando…

Revealing inhibition difference between PFI-2 enantiomers against SETD7 by molecular dynamics simulations, binding free energy calculations and unbinding pathway analysis

SETD7 is associated with multiple diseases related signaling pathways. (R)-PFI-2 is the first SETD7 inhibitor with nanomolar inhibitory potency. The activity of (R)-PFI-2 is about 500 times over that of (S)-PFI-2. Understanding the mechanism behind this difference will be helpful to discovery and de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Niu, Yuzhen, Shi, Danfeng, Li, Lanlan, Guo, Jingyun, Liu, Huanxiang, Yao, Xiaojun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5394549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28417976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep46547
_version_ 1783229750710370304
author Niu, Yuzhen
Shi, Danfeng
Li, Lanlan
Guo, Jingyun
Liu, Huanxiang
Yao, Xiaojun
author_facet Niu, Yuzhen
Shi, Danfeng
Li, Lanlan
Guo, Jingyun
Liu, Huanxiang
Yao, Xiaojun
author_sort Niu, Yuzhen
collection PubMed
description SETD7 is associated with multiple diseases related signaling pathways. (R)-PFI-2 is the first SETD7 inhibitor with nanomolar inhibitory potency. The activity of (R)-PFI-2 is about 500 times over that of (S)-PFI-2. Understanding the mechanism behind this difference will be helpful to discovery and design of more potent SETD7 inhibitors. A computational study combining molecular dynamics simulation, binding free energy calculations, and residue interaction network (RIN) was performed on the (S)-PFI-2/SETD7 and (R)-PFI-2/SETD7 complexes to explore the molecular mechanism behind the different inhibition activity. The results from Molecular Mechanics/Generalized Born Surface Area (MM/GBSA) calculation show (R)-PFI-2 has lower binding free energy. Residues H252, D256, L267, Y335, G336 and H339 are responsible for the binding of SETD7 to the (R)-PFI-2. RIN analysis indicates van der Waals interaction is critical for the binding of (R)-PFI-2. The results from adaptive basing force (ABF) simulation confirm that the free energy barrier of (R)-PFI-2 dissociating from the SETD7 is larger than that of (S)-PFI-2. (S)-PFI-2 and (R)-PFI-2 dissociate from the SETD7 binding site along different reaction coordinate and have potential mean of force (PMF) depth. Our simulations results will be useful to understand molecular mechanism of activity difference between PFI-2 enantiomers against SETD7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5394549
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53945492017-04-20 Revealing inhibition difference between PFI-2 enantiomers against SETD7 by molecular dynamics simulations, binding free energy calculations and unbinding pathway analysis Niu, Yuzhen Shi, Danfeng Li, Lanlan Guo, Jingyun Liu, Huanxiang Yao, Xiaojun Sci Rep Article SETD7 is associated with multiple diseases related signaling pathways. (R)-PFI-2 is the first SETD7 inhibitor with nanomolar inhibitory potency. The activity of (R)-PFI-2 is about 500 times over that of (S)-PFI-2. Understanding the mechanism behind this difference will be helpful to discovery and design of more potent SETD7 inhibitors. A computational study combining molecular dynamics simulation, binding free energy calculations, and residue interaction network (RIN) was performed on the (S)-PFI-2/SETD7 and (R)-PFI-2/SETD7 complexes to explore the molecular mechanism behind the different inhibition activity. The results from Molecular Mechanics/Generalized Born Surface Area (MM/GBSA) calculation show (R)-PFI-2 has lower binding free energy. Residues H252, D256, L267, Y335, G336 and H339 are responsible for the binding of SETD7 to the (R)-PFI-2. RIN analysis indicates van der Waals interaction is critical for the binding of (R)-PFI-2. The results from adaptive basing force (ABF) simulation confirm that the free energy barrier of (R)-PFI-2 dissociating from the SETD7 is larger than that of (S)-PFI-2. (S)-PFI-2 and (R)-PFI-2 dissociate from the SETD7 binding site along different reaction coordinate and have potential mean of force (PMF) depth. Our simulations results will be useful to understand molecular mechanism of activity difference between PFI-2 enantiomers against SETD7. Nature Publishing Group 2017-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5394549/ /pubmed/28417976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep46547 Text en Copyright © 2017, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Niu, Yuzhen
Shi, Danfeng
Li, Lanlan
Guo, Jingyun
Liu, Huanxiang
Yao, Xiaojun
Revealing inhibition difference between PFI-2 enantiomers against SETD7 by molecular dynamics simulations, binding free energy calculations and unbinding pathway analysis
title Revealing inhibition difference between PFI-2 enantiomers against SETD7 by molecular dynamics simulations, binding free energy calculations and unbinding pathway analysis
title_full Revealing inhibition difference between PFI-2 enantiomers against SETD7 by molecular dynamics simulations, binding free energy calculations and unbinding pathway analysis
title_fullStr Revealing inhibition difference between PFI-2 enantiomers against SETD7 by molecular dynamics simulations, binding free energy calculations and unbinding pathway analysis
title_full_unstemmed Revealing inhibition difference between PFI-2 enantiomers against SETD7 by molecular dynamics simulations, binding free energy calculations and unbinding pathway analysis
title_short Revealing inhibition difference between PFI-2 enantiomers against SETD7 by molecular dynamics simulations, binding free energy calculations and unbinding pathway analysis
title_sort revealing inhibition difference between pfi-2 enantiomers against setd7 by molecular dynamics simulations, binding free energy calculations and unbinding pathway analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5394549/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28417976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep46547
work_keys_str_mv AT niuyuzhen revealinginhibitiondifferencebetweenpfi2enantiomersagainstsetd7bymoleculardynamicssimulationsbindingfreeenergycalculationsandunbindingpathwayanalysis
AT shidanfeng revealinginhibitiondifferencebetweenpfi2enantiomersagainstsetd7bymoleculardynamicssimulationsbindingfreeenergycalculationsandunbindingpathwayanalysis
AT lilanlan revealinginhibitiondifferencebetweenpfi2enantiomersagainstsetd7bymoleculardynamicssimulationsbindingfreeenergycalculationsandunbindingpathwayanalysis
AT guojingyun revealinginhibitiondifferencebetweenpfi2enantiomersagainstsetd7bymoleculardynamicssimulationsbindingfreeenergycalculationsandunbindingpathwayanalysis
AT liuhuanxiang revealinginhibitiondifferencebetweenpfi2enantiomersagainstsetd7bymoleculardynamicssimulationsbindingfreeenergycalculationsandunbindingpathwayanalysis
AT yaoxiaojun revealinginhibitiondifferencebetweenpfi2enantiomersagainstsetd7bymoleculardynamicssimulationsbindingfreeenergycalculationsandunbindingpathwayanalysis