Cargando…

A Test and Extension of Lane and Terry’s (2000) Conceptual Model of Mood-Performance Relationships Using a Large Internet Sample

The present study tested and extended Lane and Terry (2000) conceptual model of mood-performance relationships using a large dataset from an online experiment. Methodological and theoretical advances included testing a more balanced model of pleasant and unpleasant emotions, and evaluating relations...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lane, Andrew M., Terry, Peter C., Devonport, Tracey J., Friesen, Andrew P., Totterdell, Peter A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5394934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28458641
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00470
_version_ 1783229796113711104
author Lane, Andrew M.
Terry, Peter C.
Devonport, Tracey J.
Friesen, Andrew P.
Totterdell, Peter A.
author_facet Lane, Andrew M.
Terry, Peter C.
Devonport, Tracey J.
Friesen, Andrew P.
Totterdell, Peter A.
author_sort Lane, Andrew M.
collection PubMed
description The present study tested and extended Lane and Terry (2000) conceptual model of mood-performance relationships using a large dataset from an online experiment. Methodological and theoretical advances included testing a more balanced model of pleasant and unpleasant emotions, and evaluating relationships among emotion regulation traits, states and beliefs, psychological skills use, perceptions of performance, mental preparation, and effort exerted during competition. Participants (N = 73,588) completed measures of trait emotion regulation, emotion regulation beliefs, regulation efficacy, use of psychological skills, and rated their anger, anxiety, dejection, excitement, energy, and happiness before completing a competitive concentration task. Post-competition, participants completed measures of effort exerted, beliefs about the quality of mental preparation, and subjective performance. Results showed that dejection associated with worse performance with the no-dejection group performing 3.2% better. Dejection associated with higher anxiety and anger scores and lower energy, excitement, and happiness scores. The proposed moderating effect of dejection was supported for the anxiety-performance relationship but not the anger-performance relationship. In the no-dejection group, participants who reported moderate or high anxiety outperformed those reporting low anxiety by about 1.6%. Overall, results showed partial support for Lane and Terry’s model. In terms of extending the model, results showed dejection associated with greater use of suppression, less frequent use of re-appraisal and psychological skills, lower emotion regulation beliefs, and lower emotion regulation efficacy. Further, dejection associated with greater effort during performance, beliefs that pre-competition emotions did not assist goal achievement, and low subjective performance. Future research is required to investigate the role of intense emotions in emotion regulation and performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5394934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53949342017-04-28 A Test and Extension of Lane and Terry’s (2000) Conceptual Model of Mood-Performance Relationships Using a Large Internet Sample Lane, Andrew M. Terry, Peter C. Devonport, Tracey J. Friesen, Andrew P. Totterdell, Peter A. Front Psychol Psychology The present study tested and extended Lane and Terry (2000) conceptual model of mood-performance relationships using a large dataset from an online experiment. Methodological and theoretical advances included testing a more balanced model of pleasant and unpleasant emotions, and evaluating relationships among emotion regulation traits, states and beliefs, psychological skills use, perceptions of performance, mental preparation, and effort exerted during competition. Participants (N = 73,588) completed measures of trait emotion regulation, emotion regulation beliefs, regulation efficacy, use of psychological skills, and rated their anger, anxiety, dejection, excitement, energy, and happiness before completing a competitive concentration task. Post-competition, participants completed measures of effort exerted, beliefs about the quality of mental preparation, and subjective performance. Results showed that dejection associated with worse performance with the no-dejection group performing 3.2% better. Dejection associated with higher anxiety and anger scores and lower energy, excitement, and happiness scores. The proposed moderating effect of dejection was supported for the anxiety-performance relationship but not the anger-performance relationship. In the no-dejection group, participants who reported moderate or high anxiety outperformed those reporting low anxiety by about 1.6%. Overall, results showed partial support for Lane and Terry’s model. In terms of extending the model, results showed dejection associated with greater use of suppression, less frequent use of re-appraisal and psychological skills, lower emotion regulation beliefs, and lower emotion regulation efficacy. Further, dejection associated with greater effort during performance, beliefs that pre-competition emotions did not assist goal achievement, and low subjective performance. Future research is required to investigate the role of intense emotions in emotion regulation and performance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5394934/ /pubmed/28458641 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00470 Text en Copyright © 2017 Lane, Terry, Devonport, Friesen and Totterdell. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Lane, Andrew M.
Terry, Peter C.
Devonport, Tracey J.
Friesen, Andrew P.
Totterdell, Peter A.
A Test and Extension of Lane and Terry’s (2000) Conceptual Model of Mood-Performance Relationships Using a Large Internet Sample
title A Test and Extension of Lane and Terry’s (2000) Conceptual Model of Mood-Performance Relationships Using a Large Internet Sample
title_full A Test and Extension of Lane and Terry’s (2000) Conceptual Model of Mood-Performance Relationships Using a Large Internet Sample
title_fullStr A Test and Extension of Lane and Terry’s (2000) Conceptual Model of Mood-Performance Relationships Using a Large Internet Sample
title_full_unstemmed A Test and Extension of Lane and Terry’s (2000) Conceptual Model of Mood-Performance Relationships Using a Large Internet Sample
title_short A Test and Extension of Lane and Terry’s (2000) Conceptual Model of Mood-Performance Relationships Using a Large Internet Sample
title_sort test and extension of lane and terry’s (2000) conceptual model of mood-performance relationships using a large internet sample
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5394934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28458641
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00470
work_keys_str_mv AT laneandrewm atestandextensionoflaneandterrys2000conceptualmodelofmoodperformancerelationshipsusingalargeinternetsample
AT terrypeterc atestandextensionoflaneandterrys2000conceptualmodelofmoodperformancerelationshipsusingalargeinternetsample
AT devonporttraceyj atestandextensionoflaneandterrys2000conceptualmodelofmoodperformancerelationshipsusingalargeinternetsample
AT friesenandrewp atestandextensionoflaneandterrys2000conceptualmodelofmoodperformancerelationshipsusingalargeinternetsample
AT totterdellpetera atestandextensionoflaneandterrys2000conceptualmodelofmoodperformancerelationshipsusingalargeinternetsample
AT laneandrewm testandextensionoflaneandterrys2000conceptualmodelofmoodperformancerelationshipsusingalargeinternetsample
AT terrypeterc testandextensionoflaneandterrys2000conceptualmodelofmoodperformancerelationshipsusingalargeinternetsample
AT devonporttraceyj testandextensionoflaneandterrys2000conceptualmodelofmoodperformancerelationshipsusingalargeinternetsample
AT friesenandrewp testandextensionoflaneandterrys2000conceptualmodelofmoodperformancerelationshipsusingalargeinternetsample
AT totterdellpetera testandextensionoflaneandterrys2000conceptualmodelofmoodperformancerelationshipsusingalargeinternetsample