Cargando…

Stoichiometric traits of stickleback: Effects of genetic background, rearing environment, and ontogeny

Phenotypes can both evolve in response to, and affect, ecosystem change, but few examples of diverging ecosystem‐effect traits have been investigated. Bony armor traits of fish are good candidates for this because they evolve rapidly in some freshwater fish populations, and bone is phosphorus rich a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leal, Miguel Costa, Best, Rebecca J., Durston, Dan, El‐Sabaawi, Rana W., Matthews, Blake
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5395448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28428852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2802
_version_ 1783229864134836224
author Leal, Miguel Costa
Best, Rebecca J.
Durston, Dan
El‐Sabaawi, Rana W.
Matthews, Blake
author_facet Leal, Miguel Costa
Best, Rebecca J.
Durston, Dan
El‐Sabaawi, Rana W.
Matthews, Blake
author_sort Leal, Miguel Costa
collection PubMed
description Phenotypes can both evolve in response to, and affect, ecosystem change, but few examples of diverging ecosystem‐effect traits have been investigated. Bony armor traits of fish are good candidates for this because they evolve rapidly in some freshwater fish populations, and bone is phosphorus rich and likely to affect nutrient recycling in aquatic ecosystems. Here, we explore how ontogeny, rearing environment, and bone allocation among body parts affect the stoichiometric phenotype (i.e., stoichiometric composition of bodies and excretion) of threespine stickleback. We use two populations from distinct freshwater lineages with contrasting lateral plating phenotypes (full vs. low plating) and their hybrids, which are mostly fully plated. We found that ontogeny, rearing environment, and body condition were the most important predictors of organismal stoichiometry. Although elemental composition was similar between both populations and their hybrids, we found significant divergence in phosphorus allocation among body parts and in phosphorus excretion rates. Overall, body armor differences did not explain variation in whole body phosphorus, phosphorus allocation, or phosphorus excretion. Evolutionary divergence between these lineages in both allocation and excretion is likely to have important direct consequences for ecosystems, but may be mediated by evolution of multiple morphological or physiological traits beyond plating phenotype.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5395448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53954482017-04-20 Stoichiometric traits of stickleback: Effects of genetic background, rearing environment, and ontogeny Leal, Miguel Costa Best, Rebecca J. Durston, Dan El‐Sabaawi, Rana W. Matthews, Blake Ecol Evol Original Research Phenotypes can both evolve in response to, and affect, ecosystem change, but few examples of diverging ecosystem‐effect traits have been investigated. Bony armor traits of fish are good candidates for this because they evolve rapidly in some freshwater fish populations, and bone is phosphorus rich and likely to affect nutrient recycling in aquatic ecosystems. Here, we explore how ontogeny, rearing environment, and bone allocation among body parts affect the stoichiometric phenotype (i.e., stoichiometric composition of bodies and excretion) of threespine stickleback. We use two populations from distinct freshwater lineages with contrasting lateral plating phenotypes (full vs. low plating) and their hybrids, which are mostly fully plated. We found that ontogeny, rearing environment, and body condition were the most important predictors of organismal stoichiometry. Although elemental composition was similar between both populations and their hybrids, we found significant divergence in phosphorus allocation among body parts and in phosphorus excretion rates. Overall, body armor differences did not explain variation in whole body phosphorus, phosphorus allocation, or phosphorus excretion. Evolutionary divergence between these lineages in both allocation and excretion is likely to have important direct consequences for ecosystems, but may be mediated by evolution of multiple morphological or physiological traits beyond plating phenotype. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-03-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5395448/ /pubmed/28428852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2802 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Leal, Miguel Costa
Best, Rebecca J.
Durston, Dan
El‐Sabaawi, Rana W.
Matthews, Blake
Stoichiometric traits of stickleback: Effects of genetic background, rearing environment, and ontogeny
title Stoichiometric traits of stickleback: Effects of genetic background, rearing environment, and ontogeny
title_full Stoichiometric traits of stickleback: Effects of genetic background, rearing environment, and ontogeny
title_fullStr Stoichiometric traits of stickleback: Effects of genetic background, rearing environment, and ontogeny
title_full_unstemmed Stoichiometric traits of stickleback: Effects of genetic background, rearing environment, and ontogeny
title_short Stoichiometric traits of stickleback: Effects of genetic background, rearing environment, and ontogeny
title_sort stoichiometric traits of stickleback: effects of genetic background, rearing environment, and ontogeny
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5395448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28428852
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2802
work_keys_str_mv AT lealmiguelcosta stoichiometrictraitsofsticklebackeffectsofgeneticbackgroundrearingenvironmentandontogeny
AT bestrebeccaj stoichiometrictraitsofsticklebackeffectsofgeneticbackgroundrearingenvironmentandontogeny
AT durstondan stoichiometrictraitsofsticklebackeffectsofgeneticbackgroundrearingenvironmentandontogeny
AT elsabaawiranaw stoichiometrictraitsofsticklebackeffectsofgeneticbackgroundrearingenvironmentandontogeny
AT matthewsblake stoichiometrictraitsofsticklebackeffectsofgeneticbackgroundrearingenvironmentandontogeny