Cargando…

Capture efficiency and trophic adaptations of a specialist and generalist predator: A comparison

Specialist true predators are expected to exhibit higher capture efficiencies for the capture of larger and dangerous prey than generalist predators due to their possession of specialized morphological and behavioral adaptations. We used an araneophagous spider (Lampona murina) and a generalist spid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michálek, Ondřej, Petráková, Lenka, Pekár, Stano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5395461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28428866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2812
_version_ 1783229867561582592
author Michálek, Ondřej
Petráková, Lenka
Pekár, Stano
author_facet Michálek, Ondřej
Petráková, Lenka
Pekár, Stano
author_sort Michálek, Ondřej
collection PubMed
description Specialist true predators are expected to exhibit higher capture efficiencies for the capture of larger and dangerous prey than generalist predators due to their possession of specialized morphological and behavioral adaptations. We used an araneophagous spider (Lampona murina) and a generalist spider (Drassodes lapidosus) as phylogenetically related model species and investigated their realized and fundamental trophic niches and their efficacy with respect to prey capture and prey handling. The trophic niche of both species confirmed that Lampona had a narrow trophic niche with a predominance of spider prey (including conspecifics), while the niche of Drassodes was wide, without any preference. DNA analysis of the gut contents of Lampona spiders collected in the field revealed that spiders form a significant part of its natural diet. Lampona captured significantly larger prey than itself and the prey captured by Drassodes. As concerns hunting strategy, Lampona grasped the prey with two pairs of legs possessing scopulae, whereas Drassodes immobilized prey with silk. Lampona possess forelegs equipped with scopulae and a thicker cuticle similar to other nonrelated araneophagous spiders. Lampona fed for a longer time and extracted more nutrients than Drassodes. We show that specialized behavioral and morphological adaptations altogether increase the hunting efficiency of specialists when compared to generalists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5395461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53954612017-04-20 Capture efficiency and trophic adaptations of a specialist and generalist predator: A comparison Michálek, Ondřej Petráková, Lenka Pekár, Stano Ecol Evol Original Research Specialist true predators are expected to exhibit higher capture efficiencies for the capture of larger and dangerous prey than generalist predators due to their possession of specialized morphological and behavioral adaptations. We used an araneophagous spider (Lampona murina) and a generalist spider (Drassodes lapidosus) as phylogenetically related model species and investigated their realized and fundamental trophic niches and their efficacy with respect to prey capture and prey handling. The trophic niche of both species confirmed that Lampona had a narrow trophic niche with a predominance of spider prey (including conspecifics), while the niche of Drassodes was wide, without any preference. DNA analysis of the gut contents of Lampona spiders collected in the field revealed that spiders form a significant part of its natural diet. Lampona captured significantly larger prey than itself and the prey captured by Drassodes. As concerns hunting strategy, Lampona grasped the prey with two pairs of legs possessing scopulae, whereas Drassodes immobilized prey with silk. Lampona possess forelegs equipped with scopulae and a thicker cuticle similar to other nonrelated araneophagous spiders. Lampona fed for a longer time and extracted more nutrients than Drassodes. We show that specialized behavioral and morphological adaptations altogether increase the hunting efficiency of specialists when compared to generalists. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-03-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5395461/ /pubmed/28428866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2812 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Michálek, Ondřej
Petráková, Lenka
Pekár, Stano
Capture efficiency and trophic adaptations of a specialist and generalist predator: A comparison
title Capture efficiency and trophic adaptations of a specialist and generalist predator: A comparison
title_full Capture efficiency and trophic adaptations of a specialist and generalist predator: A comparison
title_fullStr Capture efficiency and trophic adaptations of a specialist and generalist predator: A comparison
title_full_unstemmed Capture efficiency and trophic adaptations of a specialist and generalist predator: A comparison
title_short Capture efficiency and trophic adaptations of a specialist and generalist predator: A comparison
title_sort capture efficiency and trophic adaptations of a specialist and generalist predator: a comparison
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5395461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28428866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2812
work_keys_str_mv AT michalekondrej captureefficiencyandtrophicadaptationsofaspecialistandgeneralistpredatoracomparison
AT petrakovalenka captureefficiencyandtrophicadaptationsofaspecialistandgeneralistpredatoracomparison
AT pekarstano captureefficiencyandtrophicadaptationsofaspecialistandgeneralistpredatoracomparison