Cargando…
Relative Spatial Frequency Processing Drives Hemispheric Asymmetry in Conscious Awareness
Visual stimuli with different spatial frequencies (SFs) are processed asymmetrically in the two cerebral hemispheres. Specifically, low SFs are processed relatively more efficiently in the right hemisphere than the left hemisphere, whereas high SFs show the opposite pattern. In this study, we ask wh...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5395634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28469585 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00559 |
_version_ | 1783229906177490944 |
---|---|
author | Piazza, Elise A. Silver, Michael A. |
author_facet | Piazza, Elise A. Silver, Michael A. |
author_sort | Piazza, Elise A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Visual stimuli with different spatial frequencies (SFs) are processed asymmetrically in the two cerebral hemispheres. Specifically, low SFs are processed relatively more efficiently in the right hemisphere than the left hemisphere, whereas high SFs show the opposite pattern. In this study, we ask whether these differences between the two hemispheres reflect a low-level division that is based on absolute SF values or a flexible comparison of the SFs in the visual environment at any given time. In a recent study, we showed that conscious awareness of SF information (i.e., visual perceptual selection from multiple SFs simultaneously present in the environment) differs between the two hemispheres. Building upon that result, here we employed binocular rivalry to test whether this hemispheric asymmetry is due to absolute or relative SF processing. In each trial, participants viewed a pair of rivalrous orthogonal gratings of different SFs, presented either to the left or right of central fixation, and continuously reported which grating they perceived. We found that the hemispheric asymmetry in perception is significantly influenced by relative processing of the SFs of the simultaneously presented stimuli. For example, when a medium SF grating and a higher SF grating were presented as a rivalry pair, subjects were more likely to report that they initially perceived the medium SF grating when the rivalry pair was presented in the left visual hemifield (right hemisphere), compared to the right hemifield. However, this same medium SF grating, when it was paired in rivalry with a lower SF grating, was more likely to be perceptually selected when it was in the right visual hemifield (left hemisphere). Thus, the visual system’s classification of a given SF as “low” or “high” (and therefore, which hemisphere preferentially processes that SF) depends on the other SFs that are present, demonstrating that relative SF processing contributes to hemispheric differences in visual perceptual selection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5395634 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53956342017-05-03 Relative Spatial Frequency Processing Drives Hemispheric Asymmetry in Conscious Awareness Piazza, Elise A. Silver, Michael A. Front Psychol Psychology Visual stimuli with different spatial frequencies (SFs) are processed asymmetrically in the two cerebral hemispheres. Specifically, low SFs are processed relatively more efficiently in the right hemisphere than the left hemisphere, whereas high SFs show the opposite pattern. In this study, we ask whether these differences between the two hemispheres reflect a low-level division that is based on absolute SF values or a flexible comparison of the SFs in the visual environment at any given time. In a recent study, we showed that conscious awareness of SF information (i.e., visual perceptual selection from multiple SFs simultaneously present in the environment) differs between the two hemispheres. Building upon that result, here we employed binocular rivalry to test whether this hemispheric asymmetry is due to absolute or relative SF processing. In each trial, participants viewed a pair of rivalrous orthogonal gratings of different SFs, presented either to the left or right of central fixation, and continuously reported which grating they perceived. We found that the hemispheric asymmetry in perception is significantly influenced by relative processing of the SFs of the simultaneously presented stimuli. For example, when a medium SF grating and a higher SF grating were presented as a rivalry pair, subjects were more likely to report that they initially perceived the medium SF grating when the rivalry pair was presented in the left visual hemifield (right hemisphere), compared to the right hemifield. However, this same medium SF grating, when it was paired in rivalry with a lower SF grating, was more likely to be perceptually selected when it was in the right visual hemifield (left hemisphere). Thus, the visual system’s classification of a given SF as “low” or “high” (and therefore, which hemisphere preferentially processes that SF) depends on the other SFs that are present, demonstrating that relative SF processing contributes to hemispheric differences in visual perceptual selection. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5395634/ /pubmed/28469585 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00559 Text en Copyright © 2017 Piazza and Silver. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Piazza, Elise A. Silver, Michael A. Relative Spatial Frequency Processing Drives Hemispheric Asymmetry in Conscious Awareness |
title | Relative Spatial Frequency Processing Drives Hemispheric Asymmetry in Conscious Awareness |
title_full | Relative Spatial Frequency Processing Drives Hemispheric Asymmetry in Conscious Awareness |
title_fullStr | Relative Spatial Frequency Processing Drives Hemispheric Asymmetry in Conscious Awareness |
title_full_unstemmed | Relative Spatial Frequency Processing Drives Hemispheric Asymmetry in Conscious Awareness |
title_short | Relative Spatial Frequency Processing Drives Hemispheric Asymmetry in Conscious Awareness |
title_sort | relative spatial frequency processing drives hemispheric asymmetry in conscious awareness |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5395634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28469585 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00559 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT piazzaelisea relativespatialfrequencyprocessingdriveshemisphericasymmetryinconsciousawareness AT silvermichaela relativespatialfrequencyprocessingdriveshemisphericasymmetryinconsciousawareness |