Cargando…

Tolerant, Growing Cells from Nutrient Shifts Are Not Persister Cells

There is much controversy about the metabolic state of cells that are tolerant to antibiotics, known as persister cells. In this opinion piece, we offer an explanation for the discrepancy seen: some laboratories are studying metabolically active and growing cell populations (e.g., as a result of nut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jun-Seob, Wood, Thomas K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5395667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28420737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00354-17
_version_ 1783229914149814272
author Kim, Jun-Seob
Wood, Thomas K.
author_facet Kim, Jun-Seob
Wood, Thomas K.
author_sort Kim, Jun-Seob
collection PubMed
description There is much controversy about the metabolic state of cells that are tolerant to antibiotics, known as persister cells. In this opinion piece, we offer an explanation for the discrepancy seen: some laboratories are studying metabolically active and growing cell populations (e.g., as a result of nutrient shifts) and attributing the phenotypes that they discern to persister cells while other labs are studying dormant cells. We argue here that the metabolically active cell population should more accurately be considered tolerant cells, while the dormant cells are the true persister population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5395667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53956672017-05-01 Tolerant, Growing Cells from Nutrient Shifts Are Not Persister Cells Kim, Jun-Seob Wood, Thomas K. mBio Opinion/Hypothesis There is much controversy about the metabolic state of cells that are tolerant to antibiotics, known as persister cells. In this opinion piece, we offer an explanation for the discrepancy seen: some laboratories are studying metabolically active and growing cell populations (e.g., as a result of nutrient shifts) and attributing the phenotypes that they discern to persister cells while other labs are studying dormant cells. We argue here that the metabolically active cell population should more accurately be considered tolerant cells, while the dormant cells are the true persister population. American Society for Microbiology 2017-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5395667/ /pubmed/28420737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00354-17 Text en Copyright © 2017 Kim and Wood. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Opinion/Hypothesis
Kim, Jun-Seob
Wood, Thomas K.
Tolerant, Growing Cells from Nutrient Shifts Are Not Persister Cells
title Tolerant, Growing Cells from Nutrient Shifts Are Not Persister Cells
title_full Tolerant, Growing Cells from Nutrient Shifts Are Not Persister Cells
title_fullStr Tolerant, Growing Cells from Nutrient Shifts Are Not Persister Cells
title_full_unstemmed Tolerant, Growing Cells from Nutrient Shifts Are Not Persister Cells
title_short Tolerant, Growing Cells from Nutrient Shifts Are Not Persister Cells
title_sort tolerant, growing cells from nutrient shifts are not persister cells
topic Opinion/Hypothesis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5395667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28420737
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00354-17
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjunseob tolerantgrowingcellsfromnutrientshiftsarenotpersistercells
AT woodthomask tolerantgrowingcellsfromnutrientshiftsarenotpersistercells