Cargando…
The DnaK Chaperone Uses Different Mechanisms To Promote and Inhibit Replication of Vibrio cholerae Chromosome 2
Replication of Vibrio cholerae chromosome 2 (Chr2) depends on molecular chaperone DnaK to facilitate binding of the initiator (RctB) to the replication origin. The binding occurs at two kinds of site, 12-mers and 39-mers, which promote and inhibit replication, respectively. Here we show that DnaK em...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5395669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28420739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00427-17 |
_version_ | 1783229914706608128 |
---|---|
author | Jha, Jyoti K. Li, Mi Ghirlando, Rodolfo Miller Jenkins, Lisa M. Wlodawer, Alexander Chattoraj, Dhruba |
author_facet | Jha, Jyoti K. Li, Mi Ghirlando, Rodolfo Miller Jenkins, Lisa M. Wlodawer, Alexander Chattoraj, Dhruba |
author_sort | Jha, Jyoti K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Replication of Vibrio cholerae chromosome 2 (Chr2) depends on molecular chaperone DnaK to facilitate binding of the initiator (RctB) to the replication origin. The binding occurs at two kinds of site, 12-mers and 39-mers, which promote and inhibit replication, respectively. Here we show that DnaK employs different mechanisms to enhance the two kinds of binding. We found that mutations in rctB that reduce DnaK binding also reduce 12-mer binding and initiation. The initiation defect is suppressed by second-site mutations that increase 12-mer binding only marginally. Instead, they reduce replication inhibitory mechanisms: RctB dimerization and 39-mer binding. One suppressing change was in a dimerization domain which is folded similarly to the initiator of an iteron plasmid—the presumed progenitor of Chr2. In plasmids, DnaK promotes initiation by reducing dimerization. A different mutation was in the 39-mer binding domain of RctB and inactivated it, indicating an alternative suppression mechanism. Paradoxically, although DnaK increases 39-mer binding, the increase was also achieved by inactivating the DnaK binding site of RctB. This result suggests that the site inhibits the 39-mer binding domain (via autoinhibition) when prevented from binding DnaK. Taken together, our results reveal an important feature of the transition from plasmid to chromosome: the Chr2 initiator retains the plasmid-like dimerization domain and its control by chaperones but uses the chaperones in an unprecedented way to control the inhibitory 39-mer binding. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5395669 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | American Society for Microbiology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53956692017-05-01 The DnaK Chaperone Uses Different Mechanisms To Promote and Inhibit Replication of Vibrio cholerae Chromosome 2 Jha, Jyoti K. Li, Mi Ghirlando, Rodolfo Miller Jenkins, Lisa M. Wlodawer, Alexander Chattoraj, Dhruba mBio Research Article Replication of Vibrio cholerae chromosome 2 (Chr2) depends on molecular chaperone DnaK to facilitate binding of the initiator (RctB) to the replication origin. The binding occurs at two kinds of site, 12-mers and 39-mers, which promote and inhibit replication, respectively. Here we show that DnaK employs different mechanisms to enhance the two kinds of binding. We found that mutations in rctB that reduce DnaK binding also reduce 12-mer binding and initiation. The initiation defect is suppressed by second-site mutations that increase 12-mer binding only marginally. Instead, they reduce replication inhibitory mechanisms: RctB dimerization and 39-mer binding. One suppressing change was in a dimerization domain which is folded similarly to the initiator of an iteron plasmid—the presumed progenitor of Chr2. In plasmids, DnaK promotes initiation by reducing dimerization. A different mutation was in the 39-mer binding domain of RctB and inactivated it, indicating an alternative suppression mechanism. Paradoxically, although DnaK increases 39-mer binding, the increase was also achieved by inactivating the DnaK binding site of RctB. This result suggests that the site inhibits the 39-mer binding domain (via autoinhibition) when prevented from binding DnaK. Taken together, our results reveal an important feature of the transition from plasmid to chromosome: the Chr2 initiator retains the plasmid-like dimerization domain and its control by chaperones but uses the chaperones in an unprecedented way to control the inhibitory 39-mer binding. American Society for Microbiology 2017-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5395669/ /pubmed/28420739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00427-17 Text en Copyright © 2017 Jha et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jha, Jyoti K. Li, Mi Ghirlando, Rodolfo Miller Jenkins, Lisa M. Wlodawer, Alexander Chattoraj, Dhruba The DnaK Chaperone Uses Different Mechanisms To Promote and Inhibit Replication of Vibrio cholerae Chromosome 2 |
title | The DnaK Chaperone Uses Different Mechanisms To Promote and Inhibit Replication of Vibrio cholerae Chromosome 2 |
title_full | The DnaK Chaperone Uses Different Mechanisms To Promote and Inhibit Replication of Vibrio cholerae Chromosome 2 |
title_fullStr | The DnaK Chaperone Uses Different Mechanisms To Promote and Inhibit Replication of Vibrio cholerae Chromosome 2 |
title_full_unstemmed | The DnaK Chaperone Uses Different Mechanisms To Promote and Inhibit Replication of Vibrio cholerae Chromosome 2 |
title_short | The DnaK Chaperone Uses Different Mechanisms To Promote and Inhibit Replication of Vibrio cholerae Chromosome 2 |
title_sort | dnak chaperone uses different mechanisms to promote and inhibit replication of vibrio cholerae chromosome 2 |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5395669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28420739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00427-17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jhajyotik thednakchaperoneusesdifferentmechanismstopromoteandinhibitreplicationofvibriocholeraechromosome2 AT limi thednakchaperoneusesdifferentmechanismstopromoteandinhibitreplicationofvibriocholeraechromosome2 AT ghirlandorodolfo thednakchaperoneusesdifferentmechanismstopromoteandinhibitreplicationofvibriocholeraechromosome2 AT millerjenkinslisam thednakchaperoneusesdifferentmechanismstopromoteandinhibitreplicationofvibriocholeraechromosome2 AT wlodaweralexander thednakchaperoneusesdifferentmechanismstopromoteandinhibitreplicationofvibriocholeraechromosome2 AT chattorajdhruba thednakchaperoneusesdifferentmechanismstopromoteandinhibitreplicationofvibriocholeraechromosome2 AT jhajyotik dnakchaperoneusesdifferentmechanismstopromoteandinhibitreplicationofvibriocholeraechromosome2 AT limi dnakchaperoneusesdifferentmechanismstopromoteandinhibitreplicationofvibriocholeraechromosome2 AT ghirlandorodolfo dnakchaperoneusesdifferentmechanismstopromoteandinhibitreplicationofvibriocholeraechromosome2 AT millerjenkinslisam dnakchaperoneusesdifferentmechanismstopromoteandinhibitreplicationofvibriocholeraechromosome2 AT wlodaweralexander dnakchaperoneusesdifferentmechanismstopromoteandinhibitreplicationofvibriocholeraechromosome2 AT chattorajdhruba dnakchaperoneusesdifferentmechanismstopromoteandinhibitreplicationofvibriocholeraechromosome2 |