Cargando…

Preventing parastomal hernias with systematic intraperitoneal specifically designed mesh

BACKGROUND: Parastomal hernia is a very common complication after stoma formation. Current surgical techniques for repairing parastomal hernia have unsatisfactory results. We aim to assess our preliminary experience with prophylactic mesh placement at the time of stoma formation. METHODS: Data were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conde-Muíño, Raquel, Díez, José-Luis, Martínez, Alberto, Huertas, Francisco, Segura, Inmaculada, Palma, Pablo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5395763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28424067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0237-7
_version_ 1783229929520889856
author Conde-Muíño, Raquel
Díez, José-Luis
Martínez, Alberto
Huertas, Francisco
Segura, Inmaculada
Palma, Pablo
author_facet Conde-Muíño, Raquel
Díez, José-Luis
Martínez, Alberto
Huertas, Francisco
Segura, Inmaculada
Palma, Pablo
author_sort Conde-Muíño, Raquel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Parastomal hernia is a very common complication after stoma formation. Current surgical techniques for repairing parastomal hernia have unsatisfactory results. We aim to assess our preliminary experience with prophylactic mesh placement at the time of stoma formation. METHODS: Data were prospectively recorded. A specifically designed mesh made of polyvinyl fluoride with central conduit (Dynamesh IPST®) was fixed using an intra-peritoneal onlay technique. Safety was evaluated by means of surgical data and frequency of mesh-related complications, efficacy by the rate of parastomal hernias. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were included in the study. Three of them died before a year of follow up (not related to the stoma), so they were excluded. The other 31 patients (11 women and 20 men) were prospectively followed up after different pathologies resulting in a permanent colostomy. Twelve months after surgery CT-Scan imaging revealed two (6.4%) parastomal hernias, one of them already clinically suspected. During the follow up, 29% of the patients (n = 9) developed another type of hernia (incisional, inguinal or both). In five patients (16.1%) a light stomal retraction of the otherwise slightly prominent ostomy was observed. Median clinical follow-up was 17.5 months (range 12–34). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic parastomal mesh placement might be a safe and effective procedure with a potential to reduce the risk of parastomal hernia. Routine use of this technique should be further analysed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5395763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53957632017-04-20 Preventing parastomal hernias with systematic intraperitoneal specifically designed mesh Conde-Muíño, Raquel Díez, José-Luis Martínez, Alberto Huertas, Francisco Segura, Inmaculada Palma, Pablo BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Parastomal hernia is a very common complication after stoma formation. Current surgical techniques for repairing parastomal hernia have unsatisfactory results. We aim to assess our preliminary experience with prophylactic mesh placement at the time of stoma formation. METHODS: Data were prospectively recorded. A specifically designed mesh made of polyvinyl fluoride with central conduit (Dynamesh IPST®) was fixed using an intra-peritoneal onlay technique. Safety was evaluated by means of surgical data and frequency of mesh-related complications, efficacy by the rate of parastomal hernias. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were included in the study. Three of them died before a year of follow up (not related to the stoma), so they were excluded. The other 31 patients (11 women and 20 men) were prospectively followed up after different pathologies resulting in a permanent colostomy. Twelve months after surgery CT-Scan imaging revealed two (6.4%) parastomal hernias, one of them already clinically suspected. During the follow up, 29% of the patients (n = 9) developed another type of hernia (incisional, inguinal or both). In five patients (16.1%) a light stomal retraction of the otherwise slightly prominent ostomy was observed. Median clinical follow-up was 17.5 months (range 12–34). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic parastomal mesh placement might be a safe and effective procedure with a potential to reduce the risk of parastomal hernia. Routine use of this technique should be further analysed. BioMed Central 2017-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5395763/ /pubmed/28424067 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0237-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Conde-Muíño, Raquel
Díez, José-Luis
Martínez, Alberto
Huertas, Francisco
Segura, Inmaculada
Palma, Pablo
Preventing parastomal hernias with systematic intraperitoneal specifically designed mesh
title Preventing parastomal hernias with systematic intraperitoneal specifically designed mesh
title_full Preventing parastomal hernias with systematic intraperitoneal specifically designed mesh
title_fullStr Preventing parastomal hernias with systematic intraperitoneal specifically designed mesh
title_full_unstemmed Preventing parastomal hernias with systematic intraperitoneal specifically designed mesh
title_short Preventing parastomal hernias with systematic intraperitoneal specifically designed mesh
title_sort preventing parastomal hernias with systematic intraperitoneal specifically designed mesh
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5395763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28424067
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0237-7
work_keys_str_mv AT condemuinoraquel preventingparastomalherniaswithsystematicintraperitonealspecificallydesignedmesh
AT diezjoseluis preventingparastomalherniaswithsystematicintraperitonealspecificallydesignedmesh
AT martinezalberto preventingparastomalherniaswithsystematicintraperitonealspecificallydesignedmesh
AT huertasfrancisco preventingparastomalherniaswithsystematicintraperitonealspecificallydesignedmesh
AT segurainmaculada preventingparastomalherniaswithsystematicintraperitonealspecificallydesignedmesh
AT palmapablo preventingparastomalherniaswithsystematicintraperitonealspecificallydesignedmesh