Cargando…
Rationale and methods of the iFightDepression study: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of an internet-based self-management tool for moderate to mild depression
BACKGROUND: During the last decade online interventions have emerged as a promising approach for patients with mild/moderate depressive symptoms, reaching at large populations and representing cost-effective alternatives. The main objective of this double-blind, randomized controlled trial is to exa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5395842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28420367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1306-2 |
_version_ | 1783229950724145152 |
---|---|
author | Justicia, Azucena Elices, Matilde Cebria, Ana Isabel Palao, Diego J. Gorosabel, Jesús Puigdemont, Dolors de Diego-Adeliño, Javier Gabilondo, Andrea Iruin, Alvaro Hegerl, Ulrich Pérez, Víctor |
author_facet | Justicia, Azucena Elices, Matilde Cebria, Ana Isabel Palao, Diego J. Gorosabel, Jesús Puigdemont, Dolors de Diego-Adeliño, Javier Gabilondo, Andrea Iruin, Alvaro Hegerl, Ulrich Pérez, Víctor |
author_sort | Justicia, Azucena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: During the last decade online interventions have emerged as a promising approach for patients with mild/moderate depressive symptoms, reaching at large populations and representing cost-effective alternatives. The main objective of this double-blind, randomized controlled trial is to examine the efficacy of an internet-based self-management tool (iFightDepression) for mild to moderate depression as an add-on to treatment as usual (TAU) versus internet-based psychoeducation plus TAU. METHODS: A total of 310 participants with major depression disorder (MDD) will be recruited at four different mental-health facilities in Spain. Participants will be randomly allocated to one of two study arms: iFightDepression (iFD) tool + TAU vs. internet-based psychoeducation + TAU. Both interventions last for 8 weeks and there is a 12 weeks follow up. The primary outcome measure is changes in depressive symptoms assessed with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Additionally, pre-post interventions assessments will include socio-demographic data, a brief medical and clinical history and self-reported measures of depressive symptoms, quality of life, functional impairments and satisfaction with the iFD tool. DISCUSSION: iFightDepression is an easy-prescribed tool that could increase the efficacy of conventional treatment and potentially reach untreated patients, shortening waiting lists to receive psychological treatment. Confirming the efficacy of the iFD internet-based self-management tool as an add-on treatment for individuals with mild to moderate depression will be clinically-relevant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number NCT02312583. Clinicaltrials.gov. December 4, 2014. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5395842 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53958422017-04-20 Rationale and methods of the iFightDepression study: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of an internet-based self-management tool for moderate to mild depression Justicia, Azucena Elices, Matilde Cebria, Ana Isabel Palao, Diego J. Gorosabel, Jesús Puigdemont, Dolors de Diego-Adeliño, Javier Gabilondo, Andrea Iruin, Alvaro Hegerl, Ulrich Pérez, Víctor BMC Psychiatry Study Protocol BACKGROUND: During the last decade online interventions have emerged as a promising approach for patients with mild/moderate depressive symptoms, reaching at large populations and representing cost-effective alternatives. The main objective of this double-blind, randomized controlled trial is to examine the efficacy of an internet-based self-management tool (iFightDepression) for mild to moderate depression as an add-on to treatment as usual (TAU) versus internet-based psychoeducation plus TAU. METHODS: A total of 310 participants with major depression disorder (MDD) will be recruited at four different mental-health facilities in Spain. Participants will be randomly allocated to one of two study arms: iFightDepression (iFD) tool + TAU vs. internet-based psychoeducation + TAU. Both interventions last for 8 weeks and there is a 12 weeks follow up. The primary outcome measure is changes in depressive symptoms assessed with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Additionally, pre-post interventions assessments will include socio-demographic data, a brief medical and clinical history and self-reported measures of depressive symptoms, quality of life, functional impairments and satisfaction with the iFD tool. DISCUSSION: iFightDepression is an easy-prescribed tool that could increase the efficacy of conventional treatment and potentially reach untreated patients, shortening waiting lists to receive psychological treatment. Confirming the efficacy of the iFD internet-based self-management tool as an add-on treatment for individuals with mild to moderate depression will be clinically-relevant. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number NCT02312583. Clinicaltrials.gov. December 4, 2014. BioMed Central 2017-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5395842/ /pubmed/28420367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1306-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Justicia, Azucena Elices, Matilde Cebria, Ana Isabel Palao, Diego J. Gorosabel, Jesús Puigdemont, Dolors de Diego-Adeliño, Javier Gabilondo, Andrea Iruin, Alvaro Hegerl, Ulrich Pérez, Víctor Rationale and methods of the iFightDepression study: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of an internet-based self-management tool for moderate to mild depression |
title | Rationale and methods of the iFightDepression study: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of an internet-based self-management tool for moderate to mild depression |
title_full | Rationale and methods of the iFightDepression study: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of an internet-based self-management tool for moderate to mild depression |
title_fullStr | Rationale and methods of the iFightDepression study: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of an internet-based self-management tool for moderate to mild depression |
title_full_unstemmed | Rationale and methods of the iFightDepression study: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of an internet-based self-management tool for moderate to mild depression |
title_short | Rationale and methods of the iFightDepression study: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of an internet-based self-management tool for moderate to mild depression |
title_sort | rationale and methods of the ifightdepression study: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of an internet-based self-management tool for moderate to mild depression |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5395842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28420367 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1306-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT justiciaazucena rationaleandmethodsoftheifightdepressionstudyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheefficacyofaninternetbasedselfmanagementtoolformoderatetomilddepression AT elicesmatilde rationaleandmethodsoftheifightdepressionstudyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheefficacyofaninternetbasedselfmanagementtoolformoderatetomilddepression AT cebriaanaisabel rationaleandmethodsoftheifightdepressionstudyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheefficacyofaninternetbasedselfmanagementtoolformoderatetomilddepression AT palaodiegoj rationaleandmethodsoftheifightdepressionstudyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheefficacyofaninternetbasedselfmanagementtoolformoderatetomilddepression AT gorosabeljesus rationaleandmethodsoftheifightdepressionstudyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheefficacyofaninternetbasedselfmanagementtoolformoderatetomilddepression AT puigdemontdolors rationaleandmethodsoftheifightdepressionstudyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheefficacyofaninternetbasedselfmanagementtoolformoderatetomilddepression AT dediegoadelinojavier rationaleandmethodsoftheifightdepressionstudyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheefficacyofaninternetbasedselfmanagementtoolformoderatetomilddepression AT gabilondoandrea rationaleandmethodsoftheifightdepressionstudyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheefficacyofaninternetbasedselfmanagementtoolformoderatetomilddepression AT iruinalvaro rationaleandmethodsoftheifightdepressionstudyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheefficacyofaninternetbasedselfmanagementtoolformoderatetomilddepression AT hegerlulrich rationaleandmethodsoftheifightdepressionstudyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheefficacyofaninternetbasedselfmanagementtoolformoderatetomilddepression AT perezvictor rationaleandmethodsoftheifightdepressionstudyadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingtheefficacyofaninternetbasedselfmanagementtoolformoderatetomilddepression |