Cargando…

Personalized medicine in Europe: not yet personal enough?

BACKGROUND: Personalized medicine has the potential to allow patients to receive drugs specific to their individual disease, and to increase the efficiency of the healthcare system. There is currently no comprehensive overview of personalized medicine, and this research aims to provide an overview o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Di Paolo, Antonello, Sarkozy, François, Ryll, Bettina, Siebert, Uwe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5395930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28424057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2205-4
_version_ 1783229972990656512
author Di Paolo, Antonello
Sarkozy, François
Ryll, Bettina
Siebert, Uwe
author_facet Di Paolo, Antonello
Sarkozy, François
Ryll, Bettina
Siebert, Uwe
author_sort Di Paolo, Antonello
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Personalized medicine has the potential to allow patients to receive drugs specific to their individual disease, and to increase the efficiency of the healthcare system. There is currently no comprehensive overview of personalized medicine, and this research aims to provide an overview of the concept and definition of personalized medicine in nine European countries. METHODS: A targeted literature review of selected health databases and grey literature was conducted to collate information regarding the definition, process, use, funding, impact and challenges associated with personalized medicine. In-depth qualitative interviews were carried out with experts with health technology assessment, clinical provisioning, payer, academic, economic and industry experience, and with patient organizations. RESULTS: We identified a wide range of definitions of personalized medicine, with most studies referring to the use of diagnostics and individual biological information such as genetics and biomarkers. Few studies mentioned patients’ needs, beliefs, behaviour, values, wishes, utilities, environment and circumstances, and there was little evidence in the literature for formal incorporation of patient preferences into the evaluation of new medicines. Most interviewees described approaches to stratification and segmentation of patients based on genetic markers or diagnostics, and few mentioned health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The published literature on personalized medicine is predominantly focused on patient stratification according to individual biological information. Although these approaches are important, incorporation of environmental factors and patients’ preferences in decision making is also needed. In future, personalized medicine should move from treating diseases to managing patients, taking into account all individual factors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2205-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5395930
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-53959302017-04-20 Personalized medicine in Europe: not yet personal enough? Di Paolo, Antonello Sarkozy, François Ryll, Bettina Siebert, Uwe BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Personalized medicine has the potential to allow patients to receive drugs specific to their individual disease, and to increase the efficiency of the healthcare system. There is currently no comprehensive overview of personalized medicine, and this research aims to provide an overview of the concept and definition of personalized medicine in nine European countries. METHODS: A targeted literature review of selected health databases and grey literature was conducted to collate information regarding the definition, process, use, funding, impact and challenges associated with personalized medicine. In-depth qualitative interviews were carried out with experts with health technology assessment, clinical provisioning, payer, academic, economic and industry experience, and with patient organizations. RESULTS: We identified a wide range of definitions of personalized medicine, with most studies referring to the use of diagnostics and individual biological information such as genetics and biomarkers. Few studies mentioned patients’ needs, beliefs, behaviour, values, wishes, utilities, environment and circumstances, and there was little evidence in the literature for formal incorporation of patient preferences into the evaluation of new medicines. Most interviewees described approaches to stratification and segmentation of patients based on genetic markers or diagnostics, and few mentioned health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: The published literature on personalized medicine is predominantly focused on patient stratification according to individual biological information. Although these approaches are important, incorporation of environmental factors and patients’ preferences in decision making is also needed. In future, personalized medicine should move from treating diseases to managing patients, taking into account all individual factors. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2205-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5395930/ /pubmed/28424057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2205-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Di Paolo, Antonello
Sarkozy, François
Ryll, Bettina
Siebert, Uwe
Personalized medicine in Europe: not yet personal enough?
title Personalized medicine in Europe: not yet personal enough?
title_full Personalized medicine in Europe: not yet personal enough?
title_fullStr Personalized medicine in Europe: not yet personal enough?
title_full_unstemmed Personalized medicine in Europe: not yet personal enough?
title_short Personalized medicine in Europe: not yet personal enough?
title_sort personalized medicine in europe: not yet personal enough?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5395930/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28424057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2205-4
work_keys_str_mv AT dipaoloantonello personalizedmedicineineuropenotyetpersonalenough
AT sarkozyfrancois personalizedmedicineineuropenotyetpersonalenough
AT ryllbettina personalizedmedicineineuropenotyetpersonalenough
AT siebertuwe personalizedmedicineineuropenotyetpersonalenough