Cargando…
RANK-ligand and osteoprotegerin as biomarkers in the differentiation between periprosthetic joint infection and aseptic prosthesis loosening
AIM: To assess serum levels of RANK-ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) as biomarkers for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and compare their accuracy with standard tests. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients presenting with a painful total knee or hip arthroplasty with indication for su...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5396020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28473963 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i4.342 |
_version_ | 1783229988918525952 |
---|---|
author | Friedrich, Max J Wimmer, Matthias D Schmolders, Jan Strauss, Andreas C Ploeger, Milena M Kohlhof, Hendrik Wirtz, Dieter C Gravius, Sascha Randau, Thomas M |
author_facet | Friedrich, Max J Wimmer, Matthias D Schmolders, Jan Strauss, Andreas C Ploeger, Milena M Kohlhof, Hendrik Wirtz, Dieter C Gravius, Sascha Randau, Thomas M |
author_sort | Friedrich, Max J |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To assess serum levels of RANK-ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) as biomarkers for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and compare their accuracy with standard tests. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients presenting with a painful total knee or hip arthroplasty with indication for surgical revision were included in this prospective clinical trial. Based on standard diagnostics (joint aspirate, microbiological, and histological samples) and Musculoskeletal Infection Society consensus classification, patients were categorized into PJI, aseptic loosening, and control groups. Implant loosening was assessed radiographically and intraoperatively. Preoperative serum samples were collected and analyzed for RANKL, OPG, calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase (AP), and the bone-specific subform of AP (bAP). Statistical analysis was carried out, testing for significant differences between the three groups and between stable and loose implants. RESULTS: All three groups were identical in regards to age, gender, and joint distribution. No statistically significant differences in the serum concentration of RANKL (P = 0.16) and OPG (P = 0.45) were found between aseptic loosening and PJI, with a trend towards lower RANKL concentrations and higher OPG concentrations in the PJI group. The RANKL/OPG ratio was significant for the comparison between PJI and non-PJI (P = 0.005). A ratio > 60 ruled out PJI in all cases (specificity: 100%, 95%CI: 89, 11% to 100.0%) but only 30% of non-PJI patients crossed this threshold. The positive predictive value remained poor at any cut-off. In the differentiation between stable and loose implants, none of the parameters measured (calcium, phosphate, AP, and bAP) showed a significant difference, and only AP and bAP measurements showed a tendency towards higher values in the loosened group (with P = 0.09 for AP and P = 0.19 for bAP). CONCLUSION: Lower RANKL and higher OPG concentrations could be detected in PJI, without statistical significance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5396020 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-53960202017-05-04 RANK-ligand and osteoprotegerin as biomarkers in the differentiation between periprosthetic joint infection and aseptic prosthesis loosening Friedrich, Max J Wimmer, Matthias D Schmolders, Jan Strauss, Andreas C Ploeger, Milena M Kohlhof, Hendrik Wirtz, Dieter C Gravius, Sascha Randau, Thomas M World J Orthop Clinical Trials Study AIM: To assess serum levels of RANK-ligand (RANKL) and osteoprotegerin (OPG) as biomarkers for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and compare their accuracy with standard tests. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients presenting with a painful total knee or hip arthroplasty with indication for surgical revision were included in this prospective clinical trial. Based on standard diagnostics (joint aspirate, microbiological, and histological samples) and Musculoskeletal Infection Society consensus classification, patients were categorized into PJI, aseptic loosening, and control groups. Implant loosening was assessed radiographically and intraoperatively. Preoperative serum samples were collected and analyzed for RANKL, OPG, calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase (AP), and the bone-specific subform of AP (bAP). Statistical analysis was carried out, testing for significant differences between the three groups and between stable and loose implants. RESULTS: All three groups were identical in regards to age, gender, and joint distribution. No statistically significant differences in the serum concentration of RANKL (P = 0.16) and OPG (P = 0.45) were found between aseptic loosening and PJI, with a trend towards lower RANKL concentrations and higher OPG concentrations in the PJI group. The RANKL/OPG ratio was significant for the comparison between PJI and non-PJI (P = 0.005). A ratio > 60 ruled out PJI in all cases (specificity: 100%, 95%CI: 89, 11% to 100.0%) but only 30% of non-PJI patients crossed this threshold. The positive predictive value remained poor at any cut-off. In the differentiation between stable and loose implants, none of the parameters measured (calcium, phosphate, AP, and bAP) showed a significant difference, and only AP and bAP measurements showed a tendency towards higher values in the loosened group (with P = 0.09 for AP and P = 0.19 for bAP). CONCLUSION: Lower RANKL and higher OPG concentrations could be detected in PJI, without statistical significance. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5396020/ /pubmed/28473963 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i4.342 Text en ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Trials Study Friedrich, Max J Wimmer, Matthias D Schmolders, Jan Strauss, Andreas C Ploeger, Milena M Kohlhof, Hendrik Wirtz, Dieter C Gravius, Sascha Randau, Thomas M RANK-ligand and osteoprotegerin as biomarkers in the differentiation between periprosthetic joint infection and aseptic prosthesis loosening |
title | RANK-ligand and osteoprotegerin as biomarkers in the differentiation between periprosthetic joint infection and aseptic prosthesis loosening |
title_full | RANK-ligand and osteoprotegerin as biomarkers in the differentiation between periprosthetic joint infection and aseptic prosthesis loosening |
title_fullStr | RANK-ligand and osteoprotegerin as biomarkers in the differentiation between periprosthetic joint infection and aseptic prosthesis loosening |
title_full_unstemmed | RANK-ligand and osteoprotegerin as biomarkers in the differentiation between periprosthetic joint infection and aseptic prosthesis loosening |
title_short | RANK-ligand and osteoprotegerin as biomarkers in the differentiation between periprosthetic joint infection and aseptic prosthesis loosening |
title_sort | rank-ligand and osteoprotegerin as biomarkers in the differentiation between periprosthetic joint infection and aseptic prosthesis loosening |
topic | Clinical Trials Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5396020/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28473963 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i4.342 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT friedrichmaxj rankligandandosteoprotegerinasbiomarkersinthedifferentiationbetweenperiprostheticjointinfectionandasepticprosthesisloosening AT wimmermatthiasd rankligandandosteoprotegerinasbiomarkersinthedifferentiationbetweenperiprostheticjointinfectionandasepticprosthesisloosening AT schmoldersjan rankligandandosteoprotegerinasbiomarkersinthedifferentiationbetweenperiprostheticjointinfectionandasepticprosthesisloosening AT straussandreasc rankligandandosteoprotegerinasbiomarkersinthedifferentiationbetweenperiprostheticjointinfectionandasepticprosthesisloosening AT ploegermilenam rankligandandosteoprotegerinasbiomarkersinthedifferentiationbetweenperiprostheticjointinfectionandasepticprosthesisloosening AT kohlhofhendrik rankligandandosteoprotegerinasbiomarkersinthedifferentiationbetweenperiprostheticjointinfectionandasepticprosthesisloosening AT wirtzdieterc rankligandandosteoprotegerinasbiomarkersinthedifferentiationbetweenperiprostheticjointinfectionandasepticprosthesisloosening AT graviussascha rankligandandosteoprotegerinasbiomarkersinthedifferentiationbetweenperiprostheticjointinfectionandasepticprosthesisloosening AT randauthomasm rankligandandosteoprotegerinasbiomarkersinthedifferentiationbetweenperiprostheticjointinfectionandasepticprosthesisloosening |